Information between 28th January 2025 - 7th February 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
28 Jan 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Kim Johnson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 325 |
28 Jan 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Kim Johnson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 321 |
28 Jan 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Kim Johnson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 322 |
Speeches |
---|
Kim Johnson speeches from: Outsourcing: Government Departments
Kim Johnson contributed 1 speech (91 words) Wednesday 29th January 2025 - Westminster Hall Cabinet Office |
Kim Johnson speeches from: Gaza: Humanitarian Situation
Kim Johnson contributed 1 speech (61 words) Tuesday 28th January 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for International Development |
Written Answers |
---|
Gangs: Databases
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Thursday 30th January 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to ensure people who were convicted using information from the Gang Violence Matrix can appeal their convictions after the database is deleted. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) The Gang Violence Matrix (GVM) was an operational intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is an operational matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. The Metropolitan Police’s use of the GVM is subject to an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). We understand that since the enforcement notice the names on the GVM have been under regular review, and since its inception in 2012 over 4,000 names have been removed. Following the enforcement notice from the ICO, the Metropolitan Police made a decision that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This means that all data will permanently be destroyed on 13 February 2025. This decision was taken in order to satisfy Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website. Additionally, the ICO’s enforcement notice already requires that the Metropolitan Police review their sharing of information with third parties and, as the relevant supervisory authority, the ICO have the necessary powers to enforce compliance with said notice. The Home Office does not hold any data on individuals being charged, prosecuted or incarcerated based on information held on the GVM. In relation to the transparency of the process by which the Police collect retain and use data, the Police are subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. However, as part of the Home Office’s police reform agenda we will explore how best to support policing in the collection, use and management of their data for a range of operational and analytical purposes. |
Gangs: Databases
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Thursday 30th January 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to contact people who were included on the Gang Violence Matrix to enable them to access their information before its deletion on 13 February 2025. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) The Gang Violence Matrix (GVM) was an operational intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is an operational matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. The Metropolitan Police’s use of the GVM is subject to an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). We understand that since the enforcement notice the names on the GVM have been under regular review, and since its inception in 2012 over 4,000 names have been removed. Following the enforcement notice from the ICO, the Metropolitan Police made a decision that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This means that all data will permanently be destroyed on 13 February 2025. This decision was taken in order to satisfy Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website. Additionally, the ICO’s enforcement notice already requires that the Metropolitan Police review their sharing of information with third parties and, as the relevant supervisory authority, the ICO have the necessary powers to enforce compliance with said notice. The Home Office does not hold any data on individuals being charged, prosecuted or incarcerated based on information held on the GVM. In relation to the transparency of the process by which the Police collect retain and use data, the Police are subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. However, as part of the Home Office’s police reform agenda we will explore how best to support policing in the collection, use and management of their data for a range of operational and analytical purposes. |
Gangs: Databases
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Thursday 30th January 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will hold discussions with the Metropolitan Police on the steps it is taking to ensure that data shared with third parties from the gang violence matrix is not (a) misused and (b) further disseminated. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) The Gang Violence Matrix (GVM) was an operational intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is an operational matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. The Metropolitan Police’s use of the GVM is subject to an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). We understand that since the enforcement notice the names on the GVM have been under regular review, and since its inception in 2012 over 4,000 names have been removed. Following the enforcement notice from the ICO, the Metropolitan Police made a decision that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This means that all data will permanently be destroyed on 13 February 2025. This decision was taken in order to satisfy Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website. Additionally, the ICO’s enforcement notice already requires that the Metropolitan Police review their sharing of information with third parties and, as the relevant supervisory authority, the ICO have the necessary powers to enforce compliance with said notice. The Home Office does not hold any data on individuals being charged, prosecuted or incarcerated based on information held on the GVM. In relation to the transparency of the process by which the Police collect retain and use data, the Police are subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. However, as part of the Home Office’s police reform agenda we will explore how best to support policing in the collection, use and management of their data for a range of operational and analytical purposes. |
Police: Data Protection
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Thursday 30th January 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to help improve the transparency of processes for the (a) collection, (b) retention and (c) use of data by the police. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) The Gang Violence Matrix (GVM) was an operational intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is an operational matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. The Metropolitan Police’s use of the GVM is subject to an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). We understand that since the enforcement notice the names on the GVM have been under regular review, and since its inception in 2012 over 4,000 names have been removed. Following the enforcement notice from the ICO, the Metropolitan Police made a decision that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This means that all data will permanently be destroyed on 13 February 2025. This decision was taken in order to satisfy Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website. Additionally, the ICO’s enforcement notice already requires that the Metropolitan Police review their sharing of information with third parties and, as the relevant supervisory authority, the ICO have the necessary powers to enforce compliance with said notice. The Home Office does not hold any data on individuals being charged, prosecuted or incarcerated based on information held on the GVM. In relation to the transparency of the process by which the Police collect retain and use data, the Police are subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. However, as part of the Home Office’s police reform agenda we will explore how best to support policing in the collection, use and management of their data for a range of operational and analytical purposes. |
Gangs: Databases
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Thursday 30th January 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the permanent deletion of the Metropolitan Police's Gang Violence Matrix database on access to justice for people who were wrongfully included on the database. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) The Gang Violence Matrix (GVM) was an operational intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is an operational matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. The Metropolitan Police’s use of the GVM is subject to an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). We understand that since the enforcement notice the names on the GVM have been under regular review, and since its inception in 2012 over 4,000 names have been removed. Following the enforcement notice from the ICO, the Metropolitan Police made a decision that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This means that all data will permanently be destroyed on 13 February 2025. This decision was taken in order to satisfy Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website. Additionally, the ICO’s enforcement notice already requires that the Metropolitan Police review their sharing of information with third parties and, as the relevant supervisory authority, the ICO have the necessary powers to enforce compliance with said notice. The Home Office does not hold any data on individuals being charged, prosecuted or incarcerated based on information held on the GVM. In relation to the transparency of the process by which the Police collect retain and use data, the Police are subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. However, as part of the Home Office’s police reform agenda we will explore how best to support policing in the collection, use and management of their data for a range of operational and analytical purposes. |
Prisoners: Costs
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Thursday 30th January 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent estimate she has made of the annual cost to the public purse of people serving imprisonment for public protection sentences. Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury It is right that the sentence was abolished. The Government is determined to make further progress towards a safe and sustainable release for those serving the IPP sentence, but not in a way that impacts public protection. For 2022/23, the average Overall Resource Expenditure cost per prisoner was £51,108. The annual cost for IPP prisoners is not collected or published. To improve the prospects of release for the unreleased cohort of IPP Prisoners, we published the updated IPP Action Plan on 15 November 2024. The Updated Plan puts stronger emphasis on effective frontline delivery in our prisons ensuring that those serving IPP sentences have a sentence plan tailored to their needs, and that they have access to the right interventions or services to address their offending behaviour. |
Crimes of Violence: Convictions
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Thursday 30th January 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of deleting the Gang Violence Matrix on the ability of wrongfully convicted people to appeal their convictions. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The now decommissioned Gang Violence Matrix was an operational risk assessment tool used by the Metropolitan Police. As a risk assessment tool, it was not used to provide evidence on which a person could be convicted. The deletion of the Gang Violence Matrix will not have any bearing on a person’s ability to appeal their convictions. In order to be convicted of an offence, evidence must be provided such that the court or jury is sure beyond reasonable doubt that the person committed the offence. There is the right to seek leave to appeal against conviction or sentence. If someone has had their application for permission to appeal refused, or had their conviction upheld on appeal, and they believe they have been wrongfully convicted, it remains open to them to apply to the Criminal Cases Review Commission. |
Crimes of Violence: Prosecutions
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Tuesday 4th February 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what estimate she has made of the number of people who have been (a) charged, (b) prosecuted and (c) incarcerated based on information obtained from the Gang Violence Matrix since 2011. Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury The Ministry of Justice publishes data on defendants prosecuted and sentenced to immediate custody in the Outcomes by Offences data tool, that can be downloaded from the Criminal Justice Statistics landing page here: Criminal Justice Statistics. However, data held centrally does not include information on whether defendants were prosecuted or sentence to immediate custody based on information obtained from the Gang Violence Matrix. This information may be held in court records but to examine individual court records would be of disproportionate costs. |
Gangs: Databases
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Tuesday 4th February 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will hold discussions with the Metropolitan Police on (a) the potential impact of its gang violence matrix on ethnic minority groups and (b) the steps it is taking to ensure that its policing practices are not discriminatory. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) The Gangs Violence Matrix (GVM) was an intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London. The police are operationally independent of the government, and the GVM was devised and operated by the Metropolitan Police, independently of the Home Office. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is a matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. Following an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Metropolitan Police made the decision to discontinue use of the GVM after 13 February 2024. The Metropolitan Police had already previously decided that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This decision was taken in order to satisfy both Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM and to ensure that any claims under Article 8 Human Rights Act could be answered. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website. Any form of discrimination in policing is unacceptable. The Government is supportive of the NPCC and College of Policing’s Police Race Action Plan which aims to improve policing’s engagement with Black communities. A number of forces have developed their own local plans to address specific needs from their communities, including the MPS.
|
Gangs: Databases
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Tuesday 4th February 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will hold discussions with the Metropolitan Police on taking steps to allow people who have been wrongfully included on the gang violence matrix to challenge their inclusion before the deletion deadline. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) The Gangs Violence Matrix (GVM) was an intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London. The police are operationally independent of the government, and the GVM was devised and operated by the Metropolitan Police, independently of the Home Office. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is a matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. Following an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Metropolitan Police made the decision to discontinue use of the GVM after 13 February 2024. The Metropolitan Police had already previously decided that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This decision was taken in order to satisfy both Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM and to ensure that any claims under Article 8 Human Rights Act could be answered. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website. Any form of discrimination in policing is unacceptable. The Government is supportive of the NPCC and College of Policing’s Police Race Action Plan which aims to improve policing’s engagement with Black communities. A number of forces have developed their own local plans to address specific needs from their communities, including the MPS. |
Gangs: Databases
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Thursday 6th February 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people serving custodial sentences were convicted based on evidence from the Gang Violence Matrix. Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury The Ministry of Justice publishes data on offenders convicted and sentenced to immediate custody in the Outcomes by Offences data tool, that can be downloaded from the Criminal Justice Statistics landing page here: Criminal Justice Statistics. However, data held centrally does not include information on whether defendants were sentenced based on information obtained from the Gang Violence Matrix. |
Gangs: Databases
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Thursday 6th February 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent estimate she has made of the number of people in the Metropolitan Police’s Gangs Violence Matrix who have been convicted under joint enterprise laws. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) The Gangs Violence Matrix (GVM) was an intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London. The police are operationally independent of the government, and the GVM was devised and operated by the Metropolitan Police, independently of the Home Office. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is a matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. Following an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Metropolitan Police made the decision to discontinue use of the GVM after 13 February 2024. The Metropolitan Police had already previously decided that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This decision was taken in order to satisfy both Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM and to ensure that any claims under Article 8 Human Rights Act could be answered. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website. Any form of discrimination in policing is unacceptable. The Government is supportive of the NPCC and College of Policing’s Police Race Action Plan which aims to improve policing’s engagement with Black communities. A number of forces have developed their own local plans to address specific needs from their communities, including the MPS. |
Gangs: Databases
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Thursday 6th February 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of identifying an independent body to safeguard data relating to the Metropolitan Police’s Gangs Violence Matrix. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) The Gangs Violence Matrix (GVM) was an intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London. The police are operationally independent of the government, and the GVM was devised and operated by the Metropolitan Police, independently of the Home Office. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is a matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. Following an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Metropolitan Police made the decision to discontinue use of the GVM after 13 February 2024. The Metropolitan Police had already previously decided that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This decision was taken in order to satisfy both Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM and to ensure that any claims under Article 8 Human Rights Act could be answered. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website. Any form of discrimination in policing is unacceptable. The Government is supportive of the NPCC and College of Policing’s Police Race Action Plan which aims to improve policing’s engagement with Black communities. A number of forces have developed their own local plans to address specific needs from their communities, including the MPS. |
Gangs: Databases
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Thursday 6th February 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will instruct the Metropolitan Police to delay the deletion of its Gangs Violence Matrix. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office) The Gangs Violence Matrix (GVM) was an intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London. The police are operationally independent of the government, and the GVM was devised and operated by the Metropolitan Police, independently of the Home Office. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is a matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. Following an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Metropolitan Police made the decision to discontinue use of the GVM after 13 February 2024. The Metropolitan Police had already previously decided that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This decision was taken in order to satisfy both Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM and to ensure that any claims under Article 8 Human Rights Act could be answered. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website. Any form of discrimination in policing is unacceptable. The Government is supportive of the NPCC and College of Policing’s Police Race Action Plan which aims to improve policing’s engagement with Black communities. A number of forces have developed their own local plans to address specific needs from their communities, including the MPS. |
Gangs: Databases
Asked by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) Thursday 6th February 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if she will make an assessment of the potential impact of the proposed deletion of the Gang Violence Matrix on (a) legal risks and (b) access to justice for affected people. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The now decommissioned Gang Violence Matrix (GVM) was an operational risk assessment tool used by the Metropolitan Police. The Metropolitan Police is the controller of this data and is operationally independent of Government. The Metropolitan Police has already extended the retention of the data for 12 months to enable persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM to exercise their Right of Access. Any individual who considers they may have been included on the GVM is entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025. The Metropolitan Police advises the public of this on its website. As the GVM is a policing tool and matter, the Ministry of Justice has no input or remit in relation to its deletion. |
Early Day Motions |
---|
Wednesday 29th January Metropolitan Police’s Gangs Violence Matrix 17 signatures (Most recent: 10 Feb 2025)Tabled by: Kim Johnson (Labour - Liverpool Riverside) That this House notes the imminent deadline of 13 February 2025 for the permanent deletion of the Metropolitan Police’s Gangs Violence Matrix (GVM) database following a successful legal challenge that highlighted its racist application and breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights; further notes that this database has unlawfully … |
Early Day Motions Signed |
---|
Wednesday 12th February Kim Johnson signed this EDM as a sponsor on Thursday 13th February 2025 Funding for the BBC World Service 9 signatures (Most recent: 13 Feb 2025)Tabled by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford) That this House celebrates the value of BBC World Service journalism as a vital source of accurate and impartial information to audiences across the globe; believes that this role has never been more important, especially given the extent of misinformation and disinformation across social media; notes the critical importance of … |
Thursday 13th February Kim Johnson signed this EDM on Thursday 13th February 2025 Refusal of Citizenship to refugees who have made irregular crossings 17 signatures (Most recent: 21 Feb 2025)Tabled by: Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East) That this House expresses deep concern over the refusal of citizenship to refugees who have made irregular crossings to the UK; notes that this policy further punishes individuals whose claims of fleeing war, persecution, and danger have been upheld by the asylum system; further notes that, due to a lack … |
Wednesday 5th February Kim Johnson signed this EDM on Wednesday 5th February 2025 Proposals to forcibly displace and ethnically cleanse Palestinians from Gaza 53 signatures (Most recent: 13 Feb 2025)Tabled by: Richard Burgon (Labour - Leeds East) That this House rejects the proposals for Gaza by President Trump on 4 February 2025; deplores the inhumanity and illegality of any efforts to forcibly displace and ethnically cleanse Palestinians from Gaza; affirms the provisions of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, that individual or mass forcible transfers or … |
Tuesday 28th January Kim Johnson signed this EDM on Tuesday 4th February 2025 Compensation for Equitable Life policyholders 14 signatures (Most recent: 12 Feb 2025)Tabled by: Bob Blackman (Conservative - Harrow East) That this House notes the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s report into Equitable Life; acknowledges its finding of a decade of maladministration by Government Departments and their regulators and its recommendation for full financial redress; further notes the then Government’s acceptance of the report’s findings and how much individuals lost … |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Outsourcing: Government Departments
53 speeches (12,925 words) Wednesday 29th January 2025 - Westminster Hall Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: Brian Leishman (Lab - Alloa and Grangemouth) Friend the Member for Liverpool Riverside (Kim Johnson) for highlighting the need for prison maintenance - Link to Speech |
Gaza: Humanitarian Situation
72 speeches (8,163 words) Tuesday 28th January 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for International Development Mentions: 1: Caroline Nokes (Con - Romsey and Southampton North) I call Kim Johnson to ask the final question. - Link to Speech |
Bill Documents |
---|
Feb. 10 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 10 February 2025 Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Dr Simon Opher Ellie Chowns Jon Trickett Ian Lavery Imran Hussain Ian Byrne Apsana Begum Kim Johnson |
Feb. 10 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 10 February 2025 Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Simon Opher Zarah Sultana Mrs Sharon Hodgson Florence Eshalomi Jon Trickett Ellie Chowns Kim Johnson |
Feb. 07 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 February 2025 Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Dr Simon Opher Ellie Chowns Jon Trickett Ian Lavery Imran Hussain Ian Byrne Apsana Begum Kim Johnson |
Feb. 07 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 7 February 2025 Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Simon Opher Zarah Sultana Mrs Sharon Hodgson Florence Eshalomi Jon Trickett Ellie Chowns Kim Johnson |
Feb. 06 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 6 February 2025 Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Brian Leishman Dr Simon Opher Jon Trickett Ian Lavery Imran Hussain Ian Byrne Apsana Begum Kim Johnson |
Feb. 06 2025
Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 6 February 2025 Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: appropriate.” 5 COMMITTEE STAGE Thursday 6 February 2025 _NC2 Dr Simon Opher Ian Byrne Iqbal Mohamed Kim Johnson |
Feb. 06 2025
Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 6 February 2025 Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _NC2 Dr Simon Opher Ian Byrne Iqbal Mohamed Kim Johnson Neil Duncan-Jordan Kate Osborne Abtisam |
Feb. 06 2025
All proceedings up to 6 February 2025 at Public Bill Committee Stage Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Bill proceedings: Commons Found: Thursday 6 February 2025 32 Withdrawn after debate_NC2 Dr Simon Opher Ian Byrne Iqbal Mohamed Kim Johnson |
Feb. 05 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 5 February 2025 Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Brian Leishman Dr Simon Opher Jon Trickett Ian Lavery Imran Hussain Ian Byrne Apsana Begum Kim Johnson |
Feb. 05 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 5 February 2025 Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: appropriate.” 5 COMMITTEE STAGE Wednesday 5 February 2025 _NC2 Dr Simon Opher Ian Byrne Iqbal Mohamed Kim Johnson |
Feb. 04 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 4 February 2025 Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Brian Leishman Dr Simon Opher Jon Trickett Ian Lavery Imran Hussain Ian Byrne Apsana Begum Kim Johnson |
Feb. 04 2025
Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 4 February 2025 Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: COMMITTEE STAGE Tuesday 4 February 2025 10 _NC2 Dr Simon Opher Ian Byrne Iqbal Mohamed Kim Johnson |
Feb. 03 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 3 February 2025 Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Brian Leishman Dr Simon Opher Jon Trickett Ian Lavery Imran Hussain Ian Byrne Apsana Begum Kim Johnson |
Feb. 03 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 3 February 2025 Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: COMMITTEE STAGE Monday 3 February 2025 10 _NC2 Dr Simon Opher Ian Byrne Iqbal Mohamed Kim Johnson |
Jan. 31 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 31 January 2025 Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Brian Leishman Dr Simon Opher Jon Trickett Ian Lavery Imran Hussain Ian Byrne Apsana Begum Kim Johnson |
Jan. 30 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 30 January 2025 Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Brian Leishman Dr Simon Opher Jon Trickett Ian Lavery Imran Hussain Ian Byrne Apsana Begum Kim Johnson |
Jan. 30 2025
Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 30 January 2025 Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Simon Opher Zarah Sultana Mrs Sharon Hodgson Florence Eshalomi Jon Trickett Ellie Chowns Kim Johnson |
Jan. 29 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 29 January 2025 Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Brian Leishman Dr Simon Opher Jon Trickett Ian Lavery Imran Hussain Ian Byrne Apsana Begum Kim Johnson |
Jan. 29 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 29 January 2025 Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: _NC2 Dr Simon Opher Ian Byrne Iqbal Mohamed Kim Johnson Neil Duncan-Jordan Kate Osborne Abtisam |