Information between 25th January 2026 - 14th February 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Youth Unemployment - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 287 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 108 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - British Indian Ocean Territory - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 284 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 358 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104 |
|
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 90 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Local Government Finance - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 272 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 143 |
|
11 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Kerry McCarthy voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 107 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Kerry McCarthy speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Kerry McCarthy contributed 1 speech (64 words) Thursday 5th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
|
Kerry McCarthy speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Kerry McCarthy contributed 1 speech (91 words) Wednesday 4th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Kerry McCarthy speeches from: Indefinite Leave to Remain
Kerry McCarthy contributed 2 speeches (84 words) Monday 2nd February 2026 - Westminster Hall Home Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Food Supply: Supply Chains
Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East) Thursday 29th January 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the potential impact global deforestation and desertification on the UK’s national food security, supply chains and food prices. Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The UK imports 40% of its food and is therefore exposed to supply chain risks such as deforestation and desertification via food security and price impacts associated with food imports.
Defra routinely conducts and updates assessments on a range of threats. HMG pub-lishes assessments in the National Risk Register and Chronic Risks Analysis, includ-ing on biodiversity loss and its interactions with ecosystems, on gov.uk.
The Government is committed to supporting sustainable production, trade and use of deforestation linked products. The Joint Nature Conservation Committee, sponsored by Defra, have created the Global Environmental Impacts of Consumption indicator, an indicator which includes analysis of the impact of forest risk commodities in global supply chains. The indicator estimates that UK consumption drove 29,300 hectares of deforestation in 2023. |
|
School Milk
Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if her Department will review current guidance under the school milk scheme to ensure consistency with NHS Eatwell guidance, which includes fortified dairy alternatives such as plant-based milks as part of a balanced diet. Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) This is a devolved matter, and this response applies to England only.
Milk and relevant dairy products only are eligible under the School Milk Subsidy Scheme. There are no plans to amend the scheme requirements to include non-dairy drinks or associated products.
The Government recognises that some children with clinical and dietary needs are unable to consume milk and expects schools to make reasonable adjustments for those with such specific needs. |
|
Octopuses: Aquaculture
Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, if she will introduce legislation to prohibit (a) octopus farming in the UK and (b) imports of commercially-farmed octopus. Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government have no current plans to prevent the import of farmed octopus products to the UK. Defra is not aware of any plans to establish octopus farming in the UK. Any such plans would be subject to relevant existing regulatory regimes. |
|
School Milk
Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment her Department has made of the potential benefits to children’s health and inclusion of expanding the School Milk Scheme to include fortified plant-based alternatives. Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) This is a devolved matter, and this response applies to England only.
Defra regularly reviews the administration and outcomes associated with the School Milk Subsidy Scheme, most recently following the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition’s assessment report of health benefits and risks of consuming plant-based drinks published in July 2025.
Only milk and relevant dairy products are currently eligible for subsidy in the School Milk Subsidy Scheme and there are no plans to extend the scheme to include fortified plant-based alternatives.
The Government recognises that some children with clinical and dietary needs are unable to consume milk and expects schools to make reasonable adjustments for those with specific needs. |
|
Soft Drinks: Taxation
Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East) Monday 2nd February 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps her Department is taking to ensure coherence between the Soft Drinks Industry Levy and other Government frameworks, including nutrient profiling, dietary guidance and restrictions on foods high in fat, sugar and salt. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) When considering the reforms to the Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL) announced at Budget 2025, HM Treasury worked closely with the Department for Health and Social Care throughout the process, including to consider whether the SDIL minimum sugar content threshold could, and should, align with the nutrient profiling model (NPM). However, it would be complex to align the SDIL, which applies only to drinks and is based on sugar content alone, with the NPM, which determines what are ‘less healthy’ foods and drinks by balancing a range of beneficial and less beneficial nutrients.
The government judges that the new SDIL threshold of 4.5g total sugar per 100ml strikes a fair balance between delivering on the SDIL’s health objectives and supporting producers with the process of reformulation.
Given the government recognises that these reforms ask soft drink producers to adapt and invest in further reformulation, and that certainty is required to support this process, the Chancellor has committed to not make any further changes to the design of the SDIL this Parliament.
|
|
Carbon Emissions: Public Consultation
Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East) Thursday 5th February 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, when he will publish the results of the Department's consultation on the Voluntary Carbon and Nature Markets: raising integrity. Answered by Katie White - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The Government welcomes the many responses to the Voluntary Carbon and Nature Markets consultation. Officials are undertaking analysis of the responses received and the Government intends to publish its response in the first half of this year. |
|
School Meals: Nutrition
Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East) Tuesday 10th February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the environmental and health impacts of their School Food guidance in the context of the 2025 EAT-Lancet Commission; and how she plans to respond to the Commission’s Planetary Health Diet recommendations. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) The department is committed to raising the healthiest generation ever and encourages schools to have a whole school approach to healthy eating.
We are continuing our work to revise the School Food Standards and are engaging experts across the sector, including academics and nutrition professionals. We are also taking account of the emerging themes from recent research and papers as we progress the review.
We are also working with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to support on the outcomes of their government Food Strategy. Additionally, schools can voluntarily follow the government buying standards
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
5 Feb 2026, 10:06 a.m. - House of Commons " Kerry McCarthy. letter is on its way to the Secretary of State, signed by over 40 MPs and peers, highlighting the coalition for Fisheries Transparency Criminal Catches " Kerry McCarthy MP (Bristol East, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Feb 2026, 4:05 p.m. - House of Lords "were Stella Creasy and Kerry McCarthy, former shadow Minister of State for DEFRA and former Minister " Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Feb 2026, 4:29 p.m. - House of Lords "very sceptical about it. And Kerry McCarthy, who Baroness Bennett " Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Public Order Act 2023 (Interference With Use or Operation of Key National Infrastructure) Regulations 2025
35 speeches (11,344 words) Wednesday 4th February 2026 - Lords Chamber Home Office Mentions: 1: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green - Life peer) Among the Labour opponents were Stella Creasy and Kerry McCarthy, former Shadow Minister of State for - Link to Speech 2: Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (LD - Life peer) Kerry McCarthy, whom the noble Baroness, Lady Bennett, mentioned, said:“I do not accept, however, that - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 4th February 2026
Oral Evidence - Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, and Department for Energy Security and Net Zero Building support for the energy transition - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee Found: has done some really good work since we came into office, and I pay tribute to my predecessor, Kerry McCarthy |
|
Wednesday 4th February 2026
Oral Evidence - University College London, Institute for Global Health, University College London, and Country Land and Business Association Building support for the energy transition - Energy Security and Net Zero Committee Found: has done some really good work since we came into office, and I pay tribute to my predecessor, Kerry McCarthy |