All 2 Debates between Keith Vaz and Simon Danczuk

Foreign National Offenders

Debate between Keith Vaz and Simon Danczuk
Tuesday 29th November 2016

(7 years, 12 months ago)

Westminster Hall
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Westminster Hall is an alternative Chamber for MPs to hold debates, named after the adjoining Westminster Hall.

Each debate is chaired by an MP from the Panel of Chairs, rather than the Speaker or Deputy Speaker. A Government Minister will give the final speech, and no votes may be called on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Simon Danczuk Portrait Simon Danczuk (Rochdale) (Ind)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Keith Vaz Portrait Keith Vaz
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill

Debate between Keith Vaz and Simon Danczuk
Monday 14th October 2013

(11 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Keith Vaz Portrait Keith Vaz
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend was one of the most vocal in the criticisms of the way in which Rochdale council operated. Is he satisfied that the council understands the seriousness of the situation and that, under its new chief executive, it is putting in place the proper processes to make sure that the situation is monitored? It cannot stop it happening again, but is my hon. Friend satisfied that things have changed for the better?

Simon Danczuk Portrait Simon Danczuk
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I appreciate my right hon. Friend’s intervention. I am more satisfied than ever that Rochdale council is playing its part in tackling on-street grooming.

It is important to note that we still await the serious case review on Rochdale. I would think that it is imminent, so it should be available in the next month or two. I think it will raise questions—not much light has been cast on this—about the performance of Greater Manchester police and whether it acted effectively enough in terms of intervening. I suspect that the serious case review will show some failings in that regard. That relates to the proposals under discussion because, had they been in place at the time, not only would the tools have been available to the police, but an emphasis would have been placed on their need to use them.