Julie Minns Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Julie Minns

Information between 13th October 2026 - 23rd October 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 305 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 306
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 299 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 193
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 307 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 312
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 302 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 304
13 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over Extension) - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 179
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114
14 Oct 2026 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 115
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 115
14 Oct 2026 - Inheritance Tax - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 99 Noes - 291
15 Oct 2026 - Highways (Financing) Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 228 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 231
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 2 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 319 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 328
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 319
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 327
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 327
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 331
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 327
21 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 111
21 Oct 2026 - Railways - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108
21 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 345 Noes - 108
21 Oct 2026 - Support for Farmers - View Vote Context
Julie Minns voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 278 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 279


Speeches
Julie Minns speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Julie Minns contributed 3 speeches (180 words)
Thursday 22nd October 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Julie Minns speeches from: Black History Month
Julie Minns contributed 1 speech (104 words)
Thursday 22nd October 2026 - Commons Chamber
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Julie Minns speeches from: E-scooters and E-bikes: Regulation
Julie Minns contributed 3 speeches (361 words)
Wednesday 21st October 2026 - Westminster Hall
Department for Transport
Julie Minns speeches from: Long Duration Electricity Storage Systems
Julie Minns contributed 1 speech (108 words)
Tuesday 20th October 2026 - Westminster Hall
Department for Energy Security & Net Zero
Julie Minns speeches from: Kinship Carers: Statutory Paid Employment Leave
Julie Minns contributed 1 speech (113 words)
Tuesday 20th October 2026 - Westminster Hall
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade
Julie Minns speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Julie Minns contributed 1 speech (65 words)
Monday 19th October 2026 - Commons Chamber
Ministry of Defence
Julie Minns speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Julie Minns contributed 1 speech (51 words)
Thursday 15th October 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade
Julie Minns speeches from: Sustainable Farming Incentive
Julie Minns contributed 1 speech (77 words)
Thursday 15th October 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Julie Minns speeches from: Business of the House
Julie Minns contributed 1 speech (82 words)
Thursday 15th October 2026 - Commons Chamber
Leader of the House
Julie Minns speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Julie Minns contributed 1 speech (54 words)
Tuesday 13th October 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department for Energy Security & Net Zero


Written Answers
Vetting: Neurodiversity
Asked by: Julie Minns (Labour - Carlisle)
Wednesday 21st October 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether his Department has assessed the extent to which criminal record disclosure questions used by employers are accessible to neurodivergent applicants.

Answered by Jake Richards - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Government is committed to helping ex-offenders overcome barriers and find employment to help turn away from reoffending and reintegrate into society. The criminal records regime is designed to play a role in this process, striking a balance between providing employers with the information they need to make safer recruitment decisions and enabling ex-offenders to rebuild their lives.

A criminal record, spent or otherwise, should not be an automatic barrier to employment. We have produced guidance for applicants and employers explaining how criminal record disclosure works, including the rules governing spent and protected convictions and cautions, and how employers should use information disclosed in making recruitment decisions. This guidance states that employers should discuss the disclosed information with the applicant and make a balanced judgment on whether someone’s convictions make them unsuitable for a particular role.

The Government also provides support through the online Disclosure Checker tool, which helps individuals understand what cautions and convictions they are required to disclose in different circumstances, and we signpost to a number of third sector organisations which can provide tailored, individual support to people with criminal records.

The Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) promotes the fair and appropriate use of criminal record information through its online guidance and outreach activity and encourages employers to discuss disclosed information with applicants where appropriate.

The Government committed to consult on a targeted, proportionate package of reforms to the childhood criminal records regime in the Youth Justice White Paper by the end of this year. We also work with employer groups and third sector charities supporting people with criminal records to promote best practice, reduce stigma and inform policy decisions. We will continue to use this engagement to ensure that guidance and support for employers and individuals remains clear, accessible and proportionate.

Vetting
Asked by: Julie Minns (Labour - Carlisle)
Wednesday 21st October 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the potential benefits of a standardised national system for criminal record declarations for applicants and employers.

Answered by Jake Richards - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Government is committed to helping ex-offenders overcome barriers and find employment to help turn away from reoffending and reintegrate into society. The criminal records regime is designed to play a role in this process, striking a balance between providing employers with the information they need to make safer recruitment decisions and enabling ex-offenders to rebuild their lives.

A criminal record, spent or otherwise, should not be an automatic barrier to employment. We have produced guidance for applicants and employers explaining how criminal record disclosure works, including the rules governing spent and protected convictions and cautions, and how employers should use information disclosed in making recruitment decisions. This guidance states that employers should discuss the disclosed information with the applicant and make a balanced judgment on whether someone’s convictions make them unsuitable for a particular role.

The Government also provides support through the online Disclosure Checker tool, which helps individuals understand what cautions and convictions they are required to disclose in different circumstances, and we signpost to a number of third sector organisations which can provide tailored, individual support to people with criminal records.

The Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) promotes the fair and appropriate use of criminal record information through its online guidance and outreach activity and encourages employers to discuss disclosed information with applicants where appropriate.

The Government committed to consult on a targeted, proportionate package of reforms to the childhood criminal records regime in the Youth Justice White Paper by the end of this year. We also work with employer groups and third sector charities supporting people with criminal records to promote best practice, reduce stigma and inform policy decisions. We will continue to use this engagement to ensure that guidance and support for employers and individuals remains clear, accessible and proportionate.

Vetting
Asked by: Julie Minns (Labour - Carlisle)
Wednesday 21st October 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the clarity and accessibility of terminology used in criminal record disclosure questions on job application forms, including references to convictions that are "protected" or "eligible for filtering".

Answered by Jake Richards - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Government is committed to helping ex-offenders overcome barriers and find employment to help turn away from reoffending and reintegrate into society. The criminal records regime is designed to play a role in this process, striking a balance between providing employers with the information they need to make safer recruitment decisions and enabling ex-offenders to rebuild their lives.

A criminal record, spent or otherwise, should not be an automatic barrier to employment. We have produced guidance for applicants and employers explaining how criminal record disclosure works, including the rules governing spent and protected convictions and cautions, and how employers should use information disclosed in making recruitment decisions. This guidance states that employers should discuss the disclosed information with the applicant and make a balanced judgment on whether someone’s convictions make them unsuitable for a particular role.

The Government also provides support through the online Disclosure Checker tool, which helps individuals understand what cautions and convictions they are required to disclose in different circumstances, and we signpost to a number of third sector organisations which can provide tailored, individual support to people with criminal records.

The Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) promotes the fair and appropriate use of criminal record information through its online guidance and outreach activity and encourages employers to discuss disclosed information with applicants where appropriate.

The Government committed to consult on a targeted, proportionate package of reforms to the childhood criminal records regime in the Youth Justice White Paper by the end of this year. We also work with employer groups and third sector charities supporting people with criminal records to promote best practice, reduce stigma and inform policy decisions. We will continue to use this engagement to ensure that guidance and support for employers and individuals remains clear, accessible and proportionate.

Vetting
Asked by: Julie Minns (Labour - Carlisle)
Wednesday 21st October 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether the his Department has considered establishing a national criminal record disclosure portal through which applicants could access information about the convictions and cautions they are required to disclose to employers.

Answered by Jake Richards - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Government is committed to helping ex-offenders overcome barriers and find employment to help turn away from reoffending and reintegrate into society. The criminal records regime is designed to play a role in this process, striking a balance between providing employers with the information they need to make safer recruitment decisions and enabling ex-offenders to rebuild their lives.

A criminal record, spent or otherwise, should not be an automatic barrier to employment. We have produced guidance for applicants and employers explaining how criminal record disclosure works, including the rules governing spent and protected convictions and cautions, and how employers should use information disclosed in making recruitment decisions. This guidance states that employers should discuss the disclosed information with the applicant and make a balanced judgment on whether someone’s convictions make them unsuitable for a particular role.

The Government also provides support through the online Disclosure Checker tool, which helps individuals understand what cautions and convictions they are required to disclose in different circumstances, and we signpost to a number of third sector organisations which can provide tailored, individual support to people with criminal records.

The Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) promotes the fair and appropriate use of criminal record information through its online guidance and outreach activity and encourages employers to discuss disclosed information with applicants where appropriate.

The Government committed to consult on a targeted, proportionate package of reforms to the childhood criminal records regime in the Youth Justice White Paper by the end of this year. We also work with employer groups and third sector charities supporting people with criminal records to promote best practice, reduce stigma and inform policy decisions. We will continue to use this engagement to ensure that guidance and support for employers and individuals remains clear, accessible and proportionate.

Vetting
Asked by: Julie Minns (Labour - Carlisle)
Wednesday 21st October 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what discussions his Department has had with employers, representative bodies and disclosure services on improving the consistency of criminal record disclosure practices across recruitment processes.

Answered by Jake Richards - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Government is committed to helping ex-offenders overcome barriers and find employment to help turn away from reoffending and reintegrate into society. The criminal records regime is designed to play a role in this process, striking a balance between providing employers with the information they need to make safer recruitment decisions and enabling ex-offenders to rebuild their lives.

A criminal record, spent or otherwise, should not be an automatic barrier to employment. We have produced guidance for applicants and employers explaining how criminal record disclosure works, including the rules governing spent and protected convictions and cautions, and how employers should use information disclosed in making recruitment decisions. This guidance states that employers should discuss the disclosed information with the applicant and make a balanced judgment on whether someone’s convictions make them unsuitable for a particular role.

The Government also provides support through the online Disclosure Checker tool, which helps individuals understand what cautions and convictions they are required to disclose in different circumstances, and we signpost to a number of third sector organisations which can provide tailored, individual support to people with criminal records.

The Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) promotes the fair and appropriate use of criminal record information through its online guidance and outreach activity and encourages employers to discuss disclosed information with applicants where appropriate.

The Government committed to consult on a targeted, proportionate package of reforms to the childhood criminal records regime in the Youth Justice White Paper by the end of this year. We also work with employer groups and third sector charities supporting people with criminal records to promote best practice, reduce stigma and inform policy decisions. We will continue to use this engagement to ensure that guidance and support for employers and individuals remains clear, accessible and proportionate.

Thermal Energy Storage
Asked by: Julie Minns (Labour - Carlisle)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero:

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether her Department has assessed the potential merits of sand battery thermal energy storage technology; and what funding programmes are available to support pilot and commercial deployment of that technology in the UK.

Answered by Katie White - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

The Department technical experts assess the potential of different energy technologies to understand their merits. There are two forms of thermal energy technology with different merits, using either “real” heat where a material is heated without a phase change, and “latent” heat where a material is melted using heat. Sand battery thermal energy storage is an example of the former technology and frequently is combined with other electricity storage technologies such as compressed air to increase efficiencies. To support development of all types of storage, the UK government and UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) launched the £28 million Ultra-Long Duration Energy Storage (Ultra-LDES) Challenge on August 20th.

Refugees: Families
Asked by: Julie Minns (Labour - Carlisle)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what progress she has made on updating refugee family reunion provisions, including expected timescales for implementation following the suspension of previous refugee family reunion routes.

Answered by Anna Turley - Minister of State (Home Office)

This Government recognises the importance of family unity and acknowledges that people who seek protection in the UK may have been separated from their families by conflict, persecution or circumstances beyond their control.

Our reforms to the asylum system, announced last autumn, mean that those granted protection will not have an automatic right to family reunion. Those who successfully move off Core Protection and enter a Work and Study visa route could become eligible to sponsor family members to come to the UK.

Our new approach will strike a fair balance between the circumstances of individual families and the wider public interest. It will be flexible enough to protect the most vulnerable while ensuring the system remains controlled and sustainable. Detailed future arrangements for family members of people with protection status remain under development.

Applications made under Appendix Family Reunion before the suspension continue to be considered under the rules in place at the time they applied.

During the suspension, other family routes, including Appendix FM, are available for family members of sponsors with protection, if they consider they meet the relevant immigration rules. More information on family visas can be found on GOV.UK at: Family visas: apply, extend or switch: Overview - GOV.UK.

Rare Diseases: Medical Records
Asked by: Julie Minns (Labour - Carlisle)
Monday 19th October 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether 999 call handlers and members of the Ambulance service will have access to the Single Patient Record to help them respond effectively to callers with life-threatening rare diseases, such as Addison's Disease.

Answered by James Frith - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Yes, they will. On my recent visit to the London Ambulance Service, which already uses the London Care Record to share information securely amongst providers across London, I spoke about the benefits that the Single Patient Record would bring about for their work in future, saying:

“When someone calls for an ambulance, every minute matters. During my visit today, I saw first-hand how important access to patient information can be in an emergency. Having details such as a patient’s medical history, medications and urgent care plans can make a real difference when time is precious. The Single Patient Record will help ensure frontline clinicians have the information they need when it matters most. And that means being able to deliver safer, more informed and more personalised care from the moment they arrive.”




Julie Minns mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

15 Oct 2026, 11:04 a.m. - House of Commons
"farmers in his constituency, I'll certainly take that back to the department and look into those issues that he's raised. >> Julie Minns thank you, Madam "
Calum Miller MP (Bicester and Woodstock, Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript
15 Oct 2026, 11:04 a.m. - House of Commons
">> Julie Minns thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. The government was absolutely right to redesign the SFI to prioritise smaller farming "
Calum Miller MP (Bicester and Woodstock, Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript
15 Oct 2026, 12:05 p.m. - House of Commons
" Julie Minns thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Cumberland and Westmorland wrestling is one of my region's most distinctive sporting and cultural traditions, and I'm "
Rt Hon Sir Alan Campbell MP, Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Tynemouth, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
20 Oct 2026, 10:04 a.m. - Treasury Committee
"We'll pick up on some of these points. And I'm going to turn to Julie Minns MP. "
Speaker 1 - View Video - View Transcript
21 Oct 2026, 10:07 a.m. - Westminster Hall
"Julie Minns. "
Speaker 1 - View Video - View Transcript


Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Oral Evidence - 2026-10-13 16:15:00+01:00

Proposals for backbench debates - Backbench Business Committee

Found: Questions 1-10 Representations made I: Scott Arthur and Clive Jones II: Scott Arthur and Julie Minns



Department Publications - Guidance
Wednesday 21st October 2026
Department for Work and Pensions
Source Page: Guidance: Disability Confident: employers that have signed up
Document: (ODS)

Found: Derbyshire Clay Cross S45 9LX Voluntary, charity and social enterprise Employer Central Midlands Julie Minns




Julie Minns - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Tuesday 3rd November 2026 9:30 a.m.
Treasury Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Budget 2026
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 4th November 2026 2 p.m.
Treasury Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Budget 2026
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 10th November 2026 2 p.m.
Treasury Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 11th November 2026 2 p.m.
Treasury Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Budget 2026
View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 20th October 2026 9:30 a.m.
Treasury Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Budget 2026
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 28th October 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chair to the Permanent Secretary of HM Treasury relating to Budget security and market sensitivity, dated 28 October 2026

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 28th October 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chair to the Chief Executive of the FCA relating to Budget security and market sensitivity, dated 28 October 2026

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 3rd November 2026
Oral Evidence - Resolution Foundation, Institute for Fiscal Studies, The LSE School of Public Policy, and Deutsche Bank

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 4th November 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from Bank of England and FCA to Chair regarding Critical Third Parties regime and Google Cloud service disruptions, dated 4 November 2026

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 14th October 2026
Written Evidence - David Roberts CV
COC0002 - Reappointment of David Roberts as the Chair of Court, Bank of England

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 14th October 2026
Written Evidence - David Roberts reappointment questionnaire
COC0001 - Reappointment of David Roberts as the Chair of Court, Bank of England

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 14th October 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chief Executive of HMRC to Chair relating to Tax Compliance in Professional Football, dated 12 October 2026

Treasury Committee
Friday 18th September 2026
Special Report - 2nd Special Report – Financial Inclusion Strategy: Government response

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 13th October 2026
Oral Evidence - Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Conduct Authority, and Financial Conduct Authority

Treasury Committee
Wednesday 14th October 2026
Oral Evidence - HM Treasury, PIMCO, and Centre for Economic Performance (CEP) at London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Economic Secretary to the Treasury to the Chair relating to the introduction of the Financial Services and Markets Bill to the House of Commons, dated 15 October 2026

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chair of Court, Bank of England to the Chair relating to new model of independent reviews, dated 12 October 2026

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chair to the Governor of the Bank of England and Chief Executive of the FCA on Critical Third Parties regime and Google Cloud service disruptions, dated 20 October 2026

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 20th October 2026
Oral Evidence - Trades Union Congress, Confederation of British Industry, and Federation of Small Businesses

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 3rd November 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chief Executive of the FCA to Chair on response to letter on Budget security and market sensitivity, dated 2 November 2026

Treasury Committee
Tuesday 3rd November 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Chief Executive of the FCA to Chair on response to letter on Budget security and market sensitivity, dated 2 November 2026

Treasury Committee