Military Covenant Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence

Military Covenant

Julian Brazier Excerpts
Wednesday 16th February 2011

(13 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jim Murphy Portrait Mr Murphy
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The fact is that prior to the financial collapse across the world and the banking crisis, we had pared down the debt. [Hon. Members: “Oh.”] There is no point in that crowd on the Government Front Bench moaning about this: throughout that period they demanded ever more spending on our armed forces. They cannot deny that.

Returning to the military covenant—

Julian Brazier Portrait Mr Julian Brazier (Canterbury) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Jim Murphy Portrait Mr Murphy
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In a second. So far, we have not had a single intervention from a Conservative Member who has said whether they are willing to back their own manifesto commitment. I do not mean that as a negative comment on the hon. Member for Canterbury (Mr Brazier) because I know he takes a keen interest in all these matters. I will happily give way to him.

Julian Brazier Portrait Mr Brazier
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to the shadow Secretary of State for giving way. He knows that I have raised with Governments of different complexions issues from the treatment of the wounded to the state of married quarters. In my 24 years here, representing a garrison city, I have never once had a serviceman or service family come to me and say, “This is all about producing a legal definition of the military covenant.” What they want is to be treated decently and that is what the Government are trying to do.

Jim Murphy Portrait Mr Murphy
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman knows that I respect him and we try to find common causes, but it is the manifesto on which he stood and in which his Prime Minister made a commitment.