Military Covenant Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence

Military Covenant

Julian Brazier Excerpts
Wednesday 16th February 2011

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jim Murphy Portrait Mr Murphy
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The fact is that prior to the financial collapse across the world and the banking crisis, we had pared down the debt. [Hon. Members: “Oh.”] There is no point in that crowd on the Government Front Bench moaning about this: throughout that period they demanded ever more spending on our armed forces. They cannot deny that.

Returning to the military covenant—

Julian Brazier Portrait Mr Julian Brazier (Canterbury) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Jim Murphy Portrait Mr Murphy
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In a second. So far, we have not had a single intervention from a Conservative Member who has said whether they are willing to back their own manifesto commitment. I do not mean that as a negative comment on the hon. Member for Canterbury (Mr Brazier) because I know he takes a keen interest in all these matters. I will happily give way to him.

Julian Brazier Portrait Mr Brazier
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to the shadow Secretary of State for giving way. He knows that I have raised with Governments of different complexions issues from the treatment of the wounded to the state of married quarters. In my 24 years here, representing a garrison city, I have never once had a serviceman or service family come to me and say, “This is all about producing a legal definition of the military covenant.” What they want is to be treated decently and that is what the Government are trying to do.

Jim Murphy Portrait Mr Murphy
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman knows that I respect him and we try to find common causes, but it is the manifesto on which he stood and in which his Prime Minister made a commitment.