Information between 1st September 2026 - 11th September 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Julia Buckley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 322 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 411 Noes - 102 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Julia Buckley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 427 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Julia Buckley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Julia Buckley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 346 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Julia Buckley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 289 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 297 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Plant Health - View Vote Context Julia Buckley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 100 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Julia Buckley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 316 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Julia Buckley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 317 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Julia Buckley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 302 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Julia Buckley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 292 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 357 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Julia Buckley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 79 Noes - 300 |
|
10 Sep 2026 - Social Housing Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Julia Buckley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 245 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 292 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Julia Buckley speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Julia Buckley contributed 1 speech (77 words) Thursday 10th September 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Julia Buckley speeches from: Water Management
Julia Buckley contributed 1 speech (80 words) Thursday 10th September 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
|
Julia Buckley speeches from: Bus Stops
Julia Buckley contributed 1 speech (406 words) Wednesday 9th September 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Transport |
|
Julia Buckley speeches from: Global Biodiversity and Ecosystems: National Security
Julia Buckley contributed 1 speech (6 words) Thursday 3rd September 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Railways: Finance
Asked by: Julia Buckley (Labour - Shrewsbury) Monday 7th September 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the Network Rail presentation “Operating Performance Model – DFTO Update” of June 2026, whether her Department uses the estimates that a 0.5 percentage-point improvement in T-3 punctuality would generate approximately £60 million in additional revenue and a 0.5 percentage-point improvement in cancellations would generate approximately £120 million in additional revenue; and whether these figures represent her Department's current assessment of the revenue impact of those improvements. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The estimates referenced in Network Rail’s June 2026 “Operating Performance Model – DFTO Update” presentation were produced as modelling assumptions to illustrate the potential relationship between operational performance improvements and revenue outcomes, and are not used by the Department as a current forecast of additional revenue. Revenue impacts will vary depending on a range of factors, including passenger demand, wider economic conditions and the nature of the performance improvements delivered. |
|
Railways
Asked by: Julia Buckley (Labour - Shrewsbury) Tuesday 8th September 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the Department expects reviews undertaken by Network Rail in support of continuing declarations of congested infrastructure to be published; and what the Department’s policy is on public transparency in relation to this. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Network Rail will continue to abide by the requirements of The Railways (Access, Management and Licensing of Railway Undertakings) Regulations 2016 for as long as they are applicable. Any formal declaration of congestion is reviewed annually as a minimum with relevant high level updates being published on the Network Rail website via a Register of Congested Infrastructure and the Network Statement.
More information can be found on the Network Rail Website here; https://www.networkrail.co.uk/industry-and-commercial/information-for-operators/ |
|
Railways: Infrastructure
Asked by: Julia Buckley (Labour - Shrewsbury) Tuesday 8th September 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the Early Indicators of Likely Congestion issued by Network Rail in relation to the Acton Lane, Washwood Heath and Crewe power supply areas constitute advisory Early Indicators of Likely Congestion or formal declarations of congested infrastructure under Regulation 26 of the Railways (Access, Management and Licensing of Railway Undertakings) Regulations 2016. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Acton Lane, Washwood Heath and Crewe are all subject to Early Indicators of Congested Infrastructure. At the time of writing this response, none of these three areas of the network have satisfied the test for congested infrastructure under The Railways (Access, Management and Licensing of Railway Undertakings) Regulations 2016 (The Regs).
Early Indicators of Likely Congestion are non-binding and advisory only with no legal or contractual status. As this notice is non-binding, it does not trigger the requirement for Network Rail to undertake either a Capacity Analysis, or a Capacity Enhancement Plan. Should the circumstances require a formal declaration of congested infrastructure then the relevant process will be followed in order to comply with the regulations.
|
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Thursday 14th May Julia Buckley signed this EDM on Friday 4th September 2026 105 signatures (Most recent: 14 Sep 2026) Tabled by: Andrew George (Liberal Democrat - St Ives) That this House notes the National Emergency Briefing held in Westminster on 27 November 2025, attended by over 1,200 leaders from politics, business, science, and civil society, which set out the escalating risks posed by climate change and nature loss; further notes the expert evidence presented that the UK faces … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
2 Sep 2026, 3:31 p.m. - Environmental Audit Committee "much, Julia Buckley. " Toby Perkins - View Video - View Transcript |
|
10 Sep 2026, 10:16 a.m. - House of Commons " Julia Buckley thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Water privatisation and climate change has left us with and climate change has left us with the twin resilience challenges of both water scarcity and flooding. " Julia Buckley MP (Shrewsbury, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Bus Stops
15 speeches (4,593 words) Wednesday 9th September 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Justin Madders (Lab - Ellesmere Port and Bromborough) Friend the Member for Shrewsbury (Julia Buckley) raised what is undoubtedly one of the hot topics of - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 2nd September 2026
Oral Evidence - Natural England, and Natural England Environmental Audit Committee Found: Q42 Julia Buckley: As you would find with any Government fund. |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 9th September 2026 2 p.m. Environmental Audit Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Progress on climate change mitigation At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Emma Pinchbeck - Chief Executive at Climate Change Committee Dr Eoin Devane - Acting Director, Net Zero at Climate Change Committee View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 14th September 2026 1:45 p.m. Environmental Audit Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Air Pollution in England At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Rt Hon Dame Diana Johnson MP - Minister of State for Public Health and Patient Safety at Department of Health and Social Care Professor Sir Chris Whitty KCB - Chief Medical Officer at Department of Health and Social Care Simon Reeve - Deputy Director for Public Health System and Workforce at Department of Health and Social Care At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Simon Lightwood MP - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Minister for Buses and Local Transport) at Department for Transport Jennifer Raynor - Deputy Director for Environment and Adaptation Strategy at Department for Transport Emma Hardy MP - Minister of State at Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Bill Parish - Deputy Director for Noise, Agricultural and Industrial Pollution at Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
8 Sep 2026
Climate adaptation Environmental Audit Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 21 Oct 2026) In its latest advice to the government, the CCC said that climate change is already disrupting life in the UK and said that the UK’s national approach to climate adaption is “not fit for purpose”. It has also argued that the government’s third National Adaptation Plan (NAP3) is not adequately preparing the UK for climate change. Through its inquiry, the Committee will consider whether the government’s current approach to adaptation goes far enough and what changes are needed to improve the UK’s resilience. The new inquiry comes shortly after the UK experienced its hottest summer since records began in 1884, with nearly three-quarters of England and Wales in drought, 23,000 hectares destroyed in major wildfires and the year’s harvest expected to be the worst on record. Action has historically focused on reducing emissions, but scientists now agree that the climate will change significantly even if global targets are reached. By 2050, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) believes heatwaves will cause 92% of existing homes to overheat, peak river flows to be higher, longer lasting and increasing the risk of flooding and drier weather leading to water supply running five billion litres short a day. The Committee invites written evidence on a range of topics including:
Read the call for evidence for more information about this inquiry, and to find out how to submit written evidence through the Committee's online evidence submission portal. |