Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address

Judith Cummins Excerpts
Monday 16th March 2026

(1 day, 10 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Judith Cummins Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Judith Cummins)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Before we come to the urgent question on the Government’s response to the Humble Address, I would like to remind the House that Peter Mandelson is the subject of an ongoing police investigation. However, no charges have been brought. The sub judice resolution, therefore, does not currently apply. In that context, it is up to Ministers how they reply, but the House’s rules do not prevent them from answering fully. None the less, I know that the House would not wish to do anything that risked prejudicing the investigation, so I gently say to Members that it would be helpful to exercise a degree of restraint in referencing the specific matters under investigation.

--- Later in debate ---
Darren Jones Portrait Darren Jones
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I can confirm that any documents that are within the scope of the Humble Address and refer to communications between Ministers and others and Peter Mandelson are part of the disclosure process currently being undertaken by the Government.

Judith Cummins Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Judith Cummins)
- Hansard - -

I call the Liberal Democrat spokesperson.

--- Later in debate ---
Gregory Stafford Portrait Gregory Stafford
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker—and I apologise for not being able to give you notice of it. The ministerial code clearly states that Ministers must provide accurate information to this House. Under the duty of truthfulness, it states that Ministers are required to

“be as open as possible with Parliament”

and maintain high standards of accountability. That is not just in what they say, but what they fail to say. I know that you do not enforce the ministerial code, Madam Deputy Speaker, but would you expect a Minister who has misled the House by omission to return to the House to correct the record?

Judith Cummins Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Judith Cummins)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I thank the hon. Member for his point of order. While the occupant of the Chair is not responsible for Ministers’ words, I would expect any Minister to return to the House to correct omission, although that is a matter for those on the Treasury Bench and not for the Chair.