Information between 20th March 2026 - 30th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Joshua Reynolds voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 56 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 164 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Joshua Reynolds voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 279 Noes - 167 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Joshua Reynolds voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 164 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Joshua Reynolds voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 167 |
|
23 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Joshua Reynolds voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 161 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Joshua Reynolds voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 149 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Joshua Reynolds voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 58 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Joshua Reynolds voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 162 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Joshua Reynolds voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 290 Noes - 163 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Joshua Reynolds voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 158 |
|
25 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Joshua Reynolds voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 162 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Joshua Reynolds speeches from: Victims and Courts Bill
Joshua Reynolds contributed 1 speech (1,358 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Wednesday 25th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
|
Joshua Reynolds speeches from: National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
Joshua Reynolds contributed 1 speech (55 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Monday 23rd March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
| Written Answers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Digital Service Providers: Infrastructure
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Friday 20th March 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment her Department has made of the adequacy of the resilience of UK critical digital services in relation to the level of concentration in the cloud infrastructure market. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) In July last year, the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) cloud market investigation identified a number of potential competition concerns which may impact the resilience of UK’s digital infrastructure. The CMA recommended that its Board consider prioritising a future Strategic Market Status (SMS) investigation into cloud services under its new digital markets powers.
The Government is committed to promoting a competitive and innovative digital economy and therefore prioritised the commencement of these powers last year, alongside a clear expectation that they be used to support competition and innovation in digital markets. The CMA is independent of Government, and decisions on which markets to investigate are a matter for its Board alone. |
||||||
|
Digital Service Providers: Competition
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Friday 20th March 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the impact of delays to competition solutions in the cloud services market on market concentration; and what consideration she has given to the implications for growth and innovation in the technology sector. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) In July last year, the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) cloud market investigation identified a number of potential competition concerns. The CMA recommended that its Board consider prioritising a future Strategic Market Status (SMS) investigation into cloud services under its new digital markets powers.
The Government is committed to promoting a competitive and innovative digital economy and therefore prioritised the commencement of these powers last year, alongside a clear expectation that they be used to support competition and innovation in digital markets. The CMA is independent of Government, and decisions on which markets to investigate are a matter for its Board alone |
||||||
|
Digital Service Providers: Competition
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Friday 20th March 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what discussions her Department has had with the Competition and Markets Authority on the proposed timetable for the next stages of its cloud market investigation; and what assessment she has made of the implications of that timetable for competition enforcement in digital infrastructure markets. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) In July last year, the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) cloud market investigation identified a number of potential competition concerns. The CMA recommended that its Board consider prioritising a future Strategic Market Status (SMS) investigation into cloud services under its new digital markets powers.
The Government is committed to promoting a competitive and innovative digital economy and therefore prioritised the commencement of these powers last year, alongside a clear expectation that they be used to support competition and innovation in digital markets. Neither the Secretary of State nor Ministers have discussed future SMS prioritisation decisions with the CMA. The CMA is independent of Government, and decisions on which markets to investigate are a matter for its Board alone. |
||||||
|
Exports
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Monday 23rd March 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what the value of exports facilitated by his Department was in each of the last five financial years by destination country. Answered by Chris Bryant - Minister of State (Department for Business and Trade) The Department supported businesses to deliver export wins worth £16.9bn in 2020/21, £17.3bn in 2021/22, and £19.6bn in 2022/23. In 2023/24 over £36bn and almost £24bn in 2024/25 export wins were delivered. The Department does not provide country-specific wins due to the risk of disclosing commercially sensitive deals. |
||||||
|
Poultry: Animal Welfare
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Monday 23rd March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what timeline and industry roadmap he has established for ending male chick culling. Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government has set out in the recently published Animal Welfare Strategy that it will encourage the egg industry to move away from the practice of killing day-old chicks. The Government will discuss with them a roadmap to reach the objective of ending male chick culling. |
||||||
|
Roads: Closures
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps National Highways is taking to ensure the provision of timely and accurate physical diversion signage during planned and unplanned road closures. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) National Highways follows the standards GG903 and GG907 outlined in the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) for diversion routes for unplanned events and planned works and activities.
These standards require NH to coordinate with customers and local traffic authorities and to conduct Customer Audits and annual engagements. National Highways monitor diversion routes for unplanned events through the National Highways operational reporting team.
|
||||||
|
Roads: Closures
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps her Department is taking to help ensure that National Highways' contractors adhere to reporting requirements when closing sections of the Strategic Road Network; and what data National Highways holds on contractor compliance with those requirements in the last 12 months. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) National Highways requires its contractors to inform National Highways’ Regional Operations Centres before closing any part of the SRN to allow appropriate signs, signals, and customer communications to be put in place. In the financial year 24/25, over 90% of the overnight closures planned by early afternoon went ahead as expected. National Highways’ traffic monitoring systems allows them to verify the status of road closures in real time.
|
||||||
|
Roads: Closures
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether National Highways is required to ensure that all planned and emergency road closures are integrated into live satellite navigation systems. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) There are no requirements for National Highways to ensure that all planned and emergency road closures are integrated into live satellite navigation. However, National Highways publishes information detailing all its planned and emergency work closures. Where available these details are published in advance.
|
||||||
|
Teachers: Conditions of Employment
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether a dedicated teacher retention strategy will be informed by evidence on teacher mental health and workplace wellbeing. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) A well supported, high-quality education workforce is critical to our mission to break down the barriers to opportunity for children and young people, which is why recruiting and retaining our expert teachers is at the heart of the government’s Plan for Change. Detailed plans on how we will recruit and retain more teachers in our 6,500 additional teachers delivery plan are available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/every-child-achieving-and-thriving. We will promote best practice in workload and wellbeing management, including flexible working opportunities, and tackle the external pressures where schools are filling the gaps. We will invest in a new programme that provides training, resources and peer support to help schools learn from each other, to normalise flexible working and manageable workloads. We will also invest £1 million additional funding each year for wellbeing support, providing up to 2,500 leaders annually with a safe and confidential space to develop new strategies to manage their resilience and capacity to thrive in their role.
. |
||||||
|
Special Educational Needs: Maidenhead
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of changes to SEND funding on mainstream school budgets in Maidenhead. Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) Nationally, mainstream school funding allocated through the dedicated schools grant (DSG) is increasing by 2.6% per pupil, from £6,608 in 2025/26 to £6,778 in 2026/27. This brings total funding for mainstream schools through the DSG schools block to £50.5 billion in 2026/27. This will support mainstream schools with ongoing costs and deliver an excellent education for all, including pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). From 2026/27 onwards, we will provide £1.6 billion for a new Inclusive Mainstream Fund over three years. We will provide more details on how this funding will be distributed in the coming weeks. |
||||||
|
Department for Education: Personnel Management
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Tuesday 24th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many directors with responsibility for human resources are employed across their department and its executive agencies; and how many of those directors hold professional HR qualifications from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development or equivalent professional bodies. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) Organograms for the department, including senior civil service posts, are published on GOV.UK here: https://www.data.gov.uk/dataset/5a1f3831-86d6-4979-9164-99e982361ca4/organogram-department-for-education. The data sets out director-level roles and responsibilities across the core department, including for our Executive Agencies. Information on the professional qualifications of individual employees is personal data, and it would not be appropriate to release this at an individual level. However, all directors appointed with responsibility for human resources would be expected to have the appropriate skills, experience and, where relevant, professional qualifications necessary to undertake the role effectively, including experience aligned with Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CPID) standards or equivalent professional bodies in line with requirements set out by the Government People Group.
|
||||||
|
Medical Treatments: Finance
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Wednesday 25th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what level of recurrent funding has been identified by NHS England to fund the recommendations of new treatments considered by NHS England’s next Clinical Priorities Advisory Group Prioritisation meeting in Spring 2026. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England is not able to provide the level of recurrent funding identified at this point to support the next Clinical Priorities Advisory Group prioritisation meeting. This would risk disclosing commercially confidential information. |
||||||
|
Medical Treatments
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Wednesday 25th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if NHS England Specialised Commissioning will consider a second prioritisation meeting this year of the Clinical Priorities Advisory Group to reduce the 20 treatments currently being considered, in addition to the meeting in Spring 2026. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England’s Clinical Priorities Advisory Group (CPAG) prioritisation meetings are held annually and are aligned to NHS England's annual financial planning cycle. The next prioritisation meeting is planned for spring 2026, where policies that are ready and require investment decisions will be considered. It is expected that up to 20 such policies will be considered at that meeting. CPAG also meets monthly to consider clinical policies and service specifications that are categorised as cost saving or cost neutral, enabling progress to be made outside of the annual prioritisation round. There are currently no plans to hold an additional prioritisation meeting this year beyond the meeting scheduled for spring 2026. |
||||||
|
Children: Maintenance
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Wednesday 25th March 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, when his Department last reviewed the Child Maintenance Service’s policy framework for modern shared‑care arrangements; and whether the Service plans to reform its policies on cases where both parents actively share day‑to‑day parenting responsibilities. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) The Government recognises that shared care arrangements can play an important role in supporting children to maintain relationships with both parents after separation.
In the child maintenance system, shared care is reflected in the maintenance calculation. Where a child stays overnight with the paying parent for at least one night a week on average, the amount of maintenance due is reduced to reflect the care provided.
If the Child Maintenance Service is satisfied that both parents have equal day-to-day care for the child, in addition to sharing overnight care, there is no requirement for either parent to pay child maintenance. |
||||||
|
Child Maintenance Service: Complaints
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Wednesday 25th March 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what plans his Department has to review the internal complaints process of the Child Maintenance Service. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) The Child Maintenance Service (CMS), as part of the Department for Work and Pensions, follows the Department’s standard complaints procedure.
The CMS regularly reviews complaint data, including insights from the Independent Case Examiner, to identify key themes and trends, which they use to drive improvements to the complaint handling process. Furthermore, lessons learned are regularly presented to operational teams, supporting them to deliver effective interventions at the initial stage of the complaint and thereby improve the overall customer experience.
The CMS remains focussed on taking pro-active steps to improve the customer experience, developing its customer service strategy to focus on improving current and future service throughout the customer journey. |
||||||
|
Water Companies: Insolvency
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Thursday 26th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps she is taking to ensure that Ofwat's successor regulator has sufficient powers to place a failing water company into Special Administration on grounds of environmental non-compliance, as well as insolvency. Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) As set out in the Water White Paper, we will create a powerful new regulator, bringing together the relevant functions from the existing regulators (of Ofwat, the Drinking Water Inspectorate, the Environment Agency and Natural England) into one new body. The new regulator will be able to deliver better services for customers, joined-up regulation and a cleaner environment for nature and the public.
The bar for the Special Administration Regime is high. As per existing legislative requirements, evidence is needed that a company is insolvent or they are in such serious breach of their principal statutory duties or an enforcement order that it is inappropriate for the company to retain its licence.
As set out in the White Paper, to ensure the regulator can act decisively should the high bar for Special Administration be met, we will ensure companies have appropriate contingency Special Administration Regime (SAR) plans, setting out how they would ensure that any special administrator, once appointed, would be able to maintain delivery of critical services and facilitate restructuring or sale if SAR is triggered. |
||||||
|
Children: Maintenance
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Thursday 26th March 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the average time is between a parent with care requesting a Financial Investigation Unit referral and the referral being actioned; and how the Department monitors compliance with internal timeframes. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) Data on the average time from a parent initiating a referral request to the Financial Investigation Unit (FIU) and that referral being actioned are not held centrally and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost. All cases which are accepted by the Financial Investigation Unit (FIU) for investigation are assessed, and appropriate evidence obtained to fully inform the course of FIU action. The length of time required to complete the FIU action will depend on the complexity of fraud. Criminal cases of course can take much longer, due to their complexity. |
||||||
|
Children: Maintenance
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Thursday 26th March 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, in the past year what has the average time been for the Child Maintenance Service to obtain a verified address for a paying parent once a caseworker identifies that one is missing; and what processes are in place to minimise delays where child maintenance arrears are accruing. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) The Government is committed to ensuring parents meet their financial obligations to their children. Where a paying parent fails to take responsibility for paying their child maintenance and cannot be traced, the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) will take immediate action and do everything within its powers to trace the paying parent. In addition to information provided by parents, CMS undertakes a series of trace checks to verify the paying parent’s address. These checks draw on several approved information sources, including; cross government databases, real time information from HM Revenue & Customs, credit reference agencies, employers and Local Authorities. The CMS have a range of strong enforcement powers that can be used against those parents who consistently refuse to meet or evade their obligations to provide financial support to their children. We are committed to using these powers fairly and in the best interests of children and separated families to ensure compliance. The statistical information requested in not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost. |
||||||
|
Children: Maintenance
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Thursday 26th March 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps the Child Maintenance Service takes to (a) verify and (b) obtain up‑to‑date addresses for paying parents in cases where enforcement action cannot proceed due to the absence of a confirmed address. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) The Government is committed to ensuring parents meet their financial obligations to their children. Where a paying parent fails to take responsibility for paying their child maintenance and cannot be traced, the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) will take immediate action and do everything within its powers to trace the paying parent. In addition to information provided by parents, CMS undertakes a series of trace checks to verify the paying parent’s address. These checks draw on several approved information sources, including; cross government databases, real time information from HM Revenue & Customs, credit reference agencies, employers and Local Authorities. The CMS have a range of strong enforcement powers that can be used against those parents who consistently refuse to meet or evade their obligations to provide financial support to their children. We are committed to using these powers fairly and in the best interests of children and separated families to ensure compliance. The statistical information requested in not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost. |
||||||
|
Children: Maintenance
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Thursday 26th March 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many cases in the last three years involved child maintenance payments being incorrectly refunded to the paying parent due to clerical error; and what steps the Department is taking to reduce such errors. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) This information is not readily available and providing it would incur disproportionate cost. The Child Maintenance Service (CMS) works to ensure cases are kept up to date and payments are processed accurately, with controls in place to minimise incorrect refunds. The introduction of the View Parent Finances screen further improves clarity and compliance by giving caseworkers a clearer, simplified view of complex financial information. |
||||||
|
Flats: Fire Prevention
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Friday 27th March 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps his Department has taken to communicate to mortgage lenders the Government's guidance that buildings under 11 metres in height do not require an EWS1 form. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Officials in my department have regular engagement with financial sector stakeholders. Lenders have been encouraged to move away from the use of EWS1 forms for buildings of all heights, and instead to rely on a Fire Risk Appraisal of External Walls (FRAEW). An EWS1 form is not a government, legal or regulatory requirement. Not all lenders ask for an EWS1, but whether they do, remains a commercial decision. |
||||||
|
Students: Loans
Asked by: Joshua Reynolds (Liberal Democrat - Maidenhead) Friday 27th March 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of the student loan repayment threshold remaining at its current level on (a) graduates in lower-paid or insecure employment, (b) social mobility and (c) students from lower-income backgrounds. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) It was announced at the Autumn Budget that the repayment and interest thresholds for Plan 2 student loans will be frozen from the 2026/27 financial year until April 2030, when they will increase annually by inflation. The department has produced the attached analysis regarding the impact of freezing the repayment and interest thresholds. If a borrower is earning above the repayment threshold and their income stays the same, then their repayments will remain the same. If a borrower is not earning above the repayment threshold and their income remains the same, they will continue to not be required to make any repayments. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Wednesday 25th March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM as a sponsor on Thursday 26th March 2026 6 signatures (Most recent: 26 Mar 2026) Tabled by: Lee Dillon (Liberal Democrat - Newbury) That this House notes with concern the changes announced by Royal Mail and Ofcom to second-class postal services, which will result in deliveries taking place on alternate weekdays with no service on the remaining days; recognises the importance of reliable postal services, particularly in rural areas where communities rely on … |
|
Wednesday 25th March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM as a sponsor on Thursday 26th March 2026 6 signatures (Most recent: 26 Mar 2026) Tabled by: Sarah Dyke (Liberal Democrat - Glastonbury and Somerton) That this House notes with concern the ongoing price shocks rural residents that rely on heating oil and LPG are facing; appreciates the Government’s offer of financial support for the most vulnerable; is anxious about whether the package will alleviate the pressures rural residents face right now, especially since only … |
|
Wednesday 25th March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM as a sponsor on Thursday 26th March 2026 Newbury Fire Station’s fundraising efforts 3 signatures (Most recent: 26 Mar 2026)Tabled by: Lee Dillon (Liberal Democrat - Newbury) That this House congratulates Newbury Fire Station’s Green Watch for hosting a charity car wash in support of The Fire Fighters Charity; praises their efforts during the event, which saw hundreds of cars queueing for up to 30 minutes before the event began and left vehicles sparkling; further praises their … |
|
Wednesday 25th March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM as a sponsor on Thursday 26th March 2026 Visa concessions for sheep shearers (No. 2) 6 signatures (Most recent: 26 Mar 2026)Tabled by: Helen Morgan (Liberal Democrat - North Shropshire) That this House welcomes the Home Office's decision to retain the visa concession for work as sheep shearers this year; recognises the vital role that the exchange of sheep shearers between the UK, and Australia and New Zealand plays in fulfilling workforce demands and ensuring timely shearing for animal welfare; … |
|
Wednesday 25th March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM as a sponsor on Thursday 26th March 2026 4 signatures (Most recent: 26 Mar 2026) Tabled by: Tim Farron (Liberal Democrat - Westmorland and Lonsdale) That this House expresses deep concern regarding the ongoing issues at the Flusco waste site in Newbiggin; highlights failures in gas and leachate management by Seletia, including their non-compliance with regulatory notices; calls for urgent reforms in waste management regulations to ensure accountability from operators; and urges the Government to … |
|
Monday 23rd March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM on Thursday 26th March 2026 Cyprus and UK Sovereign Base Areas 10 signatures (Most recent: 26 Mar 2026)Tabled by: Christine Jardine (Liberal Democrat - Edinburgh West) That this House recognises the strategic importance of the Sovereign Base Areas in Cyprus, including Akrotiri and Dhekelia, in supporting UK and allied operations in the Eastern Mediterranean; notes the United Kingdom’s role as a guarantor power under the Treaty of Guarantee 1960 and the responsibilities this entails for the … |
|
Thursday 5th March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM on Thursday 26th March 2026 King's Guard's ceremonial bearskin caps 45 signatures (Most recent: 26 Mar 2026)Tabled by: Rachael Maskell (Labour (Co-op) - York Central) That this House commends this Government's commitment to advancing animal welfare, as demonstrated by key reforms including a banning of trial hunting, a banning of boiling live crustaceans, recognising their capacity for pain and ending the cruel practice of puppy farming; acknowledges the dedicated efforts of People for the Ethical … |
|
Tuesday 24th March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM as a sponsor on Wednesday 25th March 2026 Ané Kritzinger Physics Gold Medal at STEM for BRITAIN Awards 8 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2026)Tabled by: Wendy Chamberlain (Liberal Democrat - North East Fife) That this House congratulates Ané Kritzinger on winning the Gold Medal in the Physics category at STEM for BRITAIN; recognises the outstanding achievement of presenting cutting-edge research in Parliament as part of this prestigious national competition for early-career researchers; notes that the research, conducted at University of St Andrews, focuses … |
|
Tuesday 24th March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM on Wednesday 25th March 2026 Online abuse and exploitation of Ukrainian refugees 28 signatures (Most recent: 26 Mar 2026)Tabled by: Pippa Heylings (Liberal Democrat - South Cambridgeshire) That this House expresses grave concern at evidence of widespread abuse, racism, scamming and sexual exploitation targeting Ukrainian refugees within online groups established to facilitate sponsorship under the Homes for Ukraine scheme; notes reports of malicious or inactive administrators allowing such groups to become hostile environments for vulnerable people fleeing … |
|
Monday 23rd March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM as a sponsor on Tuesday 24th March 2026 NHS funding for mental health services 23 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2026)Tabled by: Danny Chambers (Liberal Democrat - Winchester) That this House expresses deep concern over the recent news that mental health spending, as a share of total NHS expenditure, is due to fall for the third year in a row; highlights that over 2.2 million people are in contact with NHS mental health services; notes that while mental … |
|
Monday 23rd March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM as a sponsor on Tuesday 24th March 2026 25th anniversary of the Voluntary Initiative 9 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2026)Tabled by: Wendy Chamberlain (Liberal Democrat - North East Fife) That this House congratulates the Voluntary Initiative on its 25th anniversary taking place on 1 April 2026; recognises that, since its establishment in 2001, the Voluntary Initiative has brought together farmers, agronomists and industry bodies to promote the responsible use of plant protection products and reduce their environmental impact; notes … |
|
Monday 23rd March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM as a sponsor on Tuesday 24th March 2026 21 signatures (Most recent: 26 Mar 2026) Tabled by: Tom Gordon (Liberal Democrat - Harrogate and Knaresborough) That this House celebrates Sign Language Week, held from 16 to 22 March 2026; welcomes this year’s theme entitled United in Sign, celebrating unity, pride, and collective action around sign language; notes the importance of sign as a form of language, heritage and identity for the deaf community; recognises the … |
|
Thursday 19th March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM on Tuesday 24th March 2026 26 signatures (Most recent: 26 Mar 2026) Tabled by: Tim Farron (Liberal Democrat - Westmorland and Lonsdale) That this House expresses deep concern at the defunding of rural Britain; notes that the local government settlements, health provision and energy policies of this Labour Government are massively harming Britain's most rural communities; highlights the major cuts to council spending that will be required as a result of the … |
|
Thursday 19th March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM on Tuesday 24th March 2026 18 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2026) Tabled by: Tim Farron (Liberal Democrat - Westmorland and Lonsdale) That this House notes the urgent public health and environmental concerns arising from the water quality at Windermere; recognises that annual bathing water classifications do not reflect rapidly fluctuating bacterial concentrations or pollution events, including recorded sewage discharges to the lake, as evidenced by data from Save Windermere and the … |
|
Thursday 19th March Joshua Reynolds signed this EDM on Monday 23rd March 2026 23 signatures (Most recent: 25 Mar 2026) Tabled by: Calum Miller (Liberal Democrat - Bicester and Woodstock) That this House notes with grave concern the intensification of fighting in southern Lebanon, including Hezbollah’s strikes against northern Israel, IDF strikes on residential areas of Beirut, instructions from the IDF for civilians to evacuate the area south of the Zahrani River and the reported start of IDF ground operations; … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
25 Mar 2026, 2:50 p.m. - House of Commons "Thank you. >> Final Black Rod contribution. Joshua Reynolds. >> Thank you, Madam. " Lorraine Beavers MP (Blackpool North and Fleetwood, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 14th April 2026 2 p.m. Business and Trade Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Artificial Intelligence, business and the future of the workforce At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Neil Lawrence - DeepMind Professor of Machine Learning at University of Cambridge Wendy Hall - Director, Web Science Institute at University of Southampton At 3:10pm: Oral evidence Hugh Milward - UK Vice President of Corporate Affairs at Microsoft Clinton Hasell - Chief Business Officer at Kao Data Matthew Evans - Chief Operating Officer & Director of Markets at techUK At 3:50pm: Oral evidence Karim Palant - Director of External Affairs at UK Private Capital Phill Robinson - Founder at Boardwave Simon Menashy - Partner and AI Specialist at MMC Ventures View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
8 Apr 2026
UK trade with the EU Business and Trade Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 18 May 2026) At a Joint Summit in May 2025, the UK and EU agreed to a Security and Defence Partnership, and published a “Common Understanding”, setting out shared commitments to deepen cooperation. Progress since that initial summit has been limited, with core areas for agreement still to conclude. The Business and Trade Committee therefore wishes to assess the delivery and expected benefits of the Government’s EU reset to date, and to examine whether the current approach is the right model to achieve the UK’s aims. |
|
8 Apr 2026
UK trade with the US Business and Trade Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 18 May 2026) The Business and Trade Committee is conducting its bi-annual stock take on the UK-US economic and trade agreements, building on its baseline report US Economic Prosperity Deal (HC 1306, 2024–26). Since that report, the Economic Prosperity Deal (EPD) framework has been extended through a Technology Prosperity Deal (TPD) and an agreement on pharmaceutical tariffs. The Committee invites evidence on what has been delivered, and the priorities for future UK-US collaboration. |