Information between 9th March 2026 - 19th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 10 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 203 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 311 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 173 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 106 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 182 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 109 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 171 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 181 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 177 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 161 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 292 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 279 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 283 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Josh Fenton-Glynn voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 286 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 292 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Josh Fenton-Glynn speeches from: Domestic Abuse Survivors: Government Support
Josh Fenton-Glynn contributed 1 speech (87 words) Wednesday 18th March 2026 - Westminster Hall Home Office |
|
Josh Fenton-Glynn speeches from: Youth Unemployment
Josh Fenton-Glynn contributed 1 speech (63 words) Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Josh Fenton-Glynn speeches from: GP Contract
Josh Fenton-Glynn contributed 1 speech (74 words) Monday 16th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
|
Josh Fenton-Glynn speeches from: Heating Oil Support
Josh Fenton-Glynn contributed 1 speech (73 words) Monday 16th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
|
Josh Fenton-Glynn speeches from: Business of the House
Josh Fenton-Glynn contributed 1 speech (66 words) Thursday 12th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
|
Josh Fenton-Glynn speeches from: Courts and Tribunals Bill
Josh Fenton-Glynn contributed 3 speeches (109 words) 2nd reading2nd Reading Tuesday 10th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
| Written Answers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NHS: Negligence
Asked by: Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour - Calder Valley) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of staffing levels and burnout on incidents of avoidable harm in NHS Trusts. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The responsibility for determining and reviewing staffing levels remains with National Health Service clinical and other leaders at a local level, responding to local needs, supported by guidelines by national and professional bodies and overseen and regulated by the Care Quality Commission. The Government is committed to publishing a 10 Year Workforce Plan which will have a focus on supporting our hardworking and dedicated healthcare professionals. This includes the development of a new set of staff standards for modern employment. We will also roll out Staff Treatment Hubs to ensure staff have access to high quality support for occupational health. NHS organisations have a responsibility to create supportive working environments for staff, ensuring they have the conditions they need to thrive, including access to high quality health and wellbeing support. On staff burnout, relevant questions have been incorporated into the annual NHS National Staff Survey. The Copenhagen Burnout index has been included in the annual survey since 2021, providing a national, regional, and organisational view of burnout over five years. Organisations can use this information to triangulate with other data sets, including on patient safety incidents. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mental Health: Children
Asked by: Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour - Calder Valley) Tuesday 10th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent discussions the Department has had with social media companies regarding the potential impact of their platforms on child mental health. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department has not undertaken any recent engagement with social media companies regarding the potential impact of their platforms on child mental health. However, the Government is taking forward wider work to understand and address risks to children in the online world. A national consultation has recently been launched to seek views on measures to improve children’s online safety across social media, gaming platforms, and artificial intelligence chatbots. We will work closely with the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology on this consultation, including in relation to understanding the potential impact of social media use on children’s mental health. This forms part of the Government’s broader programme to create a safer digital environment for children and to reduce potential harms linked to these services. Insights from this consultation will help inform future policy to better protect children’s mental health and ensure that digital platforms play their part in promoting safe and healthy online experiences. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mental Health Services: Children and Young People
Asked by: Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour - Calder Valley) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment the Department has made of the level of experience in the CAMHS workforce and the potential impact of staff turnover on service quality. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) NHS England commissions regular workforce censuses of the children and young people’s mental health workforce. The most recent census, covering April 2023 to March 2024, includes information on how long staff have been in post across community and inpatient services, alongside a summary of the skills and training reported by providers. This provides insight into the experience and capability within the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) workforce. The Department has made no assessment of the potential impact of staff turnover on the quality of CAMHS provision. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mental Health Services: Children and Young People
Asked by: Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour - Calder Valley) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what proportion of CAMHS clinicians have received training in PTSD therapies, and what steps the Department is taking to improve training coverage. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Information on the proportion of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) clinicians who have received training in therapies for post‑traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is not collected centrally. Providers, such as National Health Service trusts and other organisations delivering CAMHS, remain responsible for ensuring that their clinicians have the appropriate skills and training to meet the needs of children and young people, including where PTSD therapies are required. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pornography: Internet
Asked by: Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour - Calder Valley) Thursday 12th March 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment has his Department made of the potential merits of moderating online porn companies which promote harmful content. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Online Safety Act’s illegal content safety duties cover illegal extreme pornographic content, ensuring companies put in place safety measures which mitigate and manage risks. Providers must implement safety by design measures to mitigate illegal activity, reduce the risk of users carrying out illegal activity, and take down illegal content when it appears. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
General Practitioners: Finance
Asked by: Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour - Calder Valley) Monday 16th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he plans to publish the full methodology for the Carr Hill formula review. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Carr-Hill review has been commissioned through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and commenced in October 2025. The purpose of the review is to ensure that funding for general practices (GPs) is distributed equitably and is targeted towards areas that need it most. It is drawing on a range of evidence and advice from experts and is giving consideration to a broad range of factors relevant to the delivery of primary care services. The review team has engaged with a range of stakeholders, including partners at The Royal College of General Practitioners, the GP committee of the British Medical Association, the NHS Confederation, as well as international informants from different countries. Members of Parliament were also invited to share any relevant insights and evidence from their constituencies in the Dear Colleague letter sent in November 2025. The first phase of the review is expected to conclude in March 2026. Subject to ministerial decision, further work would be undertaken to technically develop and model any proposed changes to the formula. Findings from the review, including methodology, will be published in due course by the NIHR, and Members of Parliament will be updated once the review findings are available. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
General Practitioners: Finance
Asked by: Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour - Calder Valley) Monday 16th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, when he expects the findings of the Carr Hill formula review to be published. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Carr-Hill review has been commissioned through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and commenced in October 2025. The purpose of the review is to ensure that funding for general practices (GPs) is distributed equitably and is targeted towards areas that need it most. It is drawing on a range of evidence and advice from experts and is giving consideration to a broad range of factors relevant to the delivery of primary care services. The review team has engaged with a range of stakeholders, including partners at The Royal College of General Practitioners, the GP committee of the British Medical Association, the NHS Confederation, as well as international informants from different countries. Members of Parliament were also invited to share any relevant insights and evidence from their constituencies in the Dear Colleague letter sent in November 2025. The first phase of the review is expected to conclude in March 2026. Subject to ministerial decision, further work would be undertaken to technically develop and model any proposed changes to the formula. Findings from the review, including methodology, will be published in due course by the NIHR, and Members of Parliament will be updated once the review findings are available. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
General Practitioners: Finance
Asked by: Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour - Calder Valley) Monday 16th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether GP practices, patient groups, and organisations representing areas of high deprivation will be invited to contribute evidence to the Carr Hill formula review. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Carr-Hill review has been commissioned through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and commenced in October 2025. The purpose of the review is to ensure that funding for general practices (GPs) is distributed equitably and is targeted towards areas that need it most. It is drawing on a range of evidence and advice from experts and is giving consideration to a broad range of factors relevant to the delivery of primary care services. The review team has engaged with a range of stakeholders, including partners at The Royal College of General Practitioners, the GP committee of the British Medical Association, the NHS Confederation, as well as international informants from different countries. Members of Parliament were also invited to share any relevant insights and evidence from their constituencies in the Dear Colleague letter sent in November 2025. The first phase of the review is expected to conclude in March 2026. Subject to ministerial decision, further work would be undertaken to technically develop and model any proposed changes to the formula. Findings from the review, including methodology, will be published in due course by the NIHR, and Members of Parliament will be updated once the review findings are available. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
General Practitioners: Finance
Asked by: Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour - Calder Valley) Monday 16th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, which external stakeholders he plans to consult as part of the review of the Carr‑Hill formula. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Carr-Hill review has been commissioned through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and commenced in October 2025. The purpose of the review is to ensure that funding for general practices (GPs) is distributed equitably and is targeted towards areas that need it most. It is drawing on a range of evidence and advice from experts and is giving consideration to a broad range of factors relevant to the delivery of primary care services. The review team has engaged with a range of stakeholders, including partners at The Royal College of General Practitioners, the GP committee of the British Medical Association, the NHS Confederation, as well as international informants from different countries. Members of Parliament were also invited to share any relevant insights and evidence from their constituencies in the Dear Colleague letter sent in November 2025. The first phase of the review is expected to conclude in March 2026. Subject to ministerial decision, further work would be undertaken to technically develop and model any proposed changes to the formula. Findings from the review, including methodology, will be published in due course by the NIHR, and Members of Parliament will be updated once the review findings are available. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GP Practice Lists: Calder Valley
Asked by: Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour - Calder Valley) Friday 13th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many patients were registered at each (a) main practice and (b) branch surgery in Calder Valley constituency in (i) July 2025 and (ii) March 2026. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The following table shows the number of registered patients at each practice in the Calder Valley constituency on 1 July 2025, and on 1 February 2026, as this is the most recent available data:
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
16 Mar 2026, 5:33 p.m. - House of Commons ">> Josh Fenton-Glynn thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. When this government took office, the number of registered patients per GP was " Stephen Kinnock MP, Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) (Aberafan Maesteg, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
16 Mar 2026, 5:33 p.m. - House of Commons "week. This is an opportunity to boost that to four, even five days a week. >> Josh Fenton-Glynn thank you, " Stephen Kinnock MP, Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) (Aberafan Maesteg, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
16 Mar 2026, 7:30 p.m. - House of Commons " Josh Fenton-Glynn thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. In the rural Madam Deputy Speaker. In the rural parts of my constituency, 1 in 20 houses rely on heating oil, and one " Martin McCluskey MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) (Inverclyde and Renfrewshire West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Mar 2026, 4:07 p.m. - House of Commons " Josh Fenton-Glynn. " Rt Hon Pat McFadden MP, The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Wolverhampton South East, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Clinical Negligence
2 speeches (1,658 words) 1st reading Commons Hansard Link Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: Catherine McKinnell (Lab - Newcastle upon Tyne North) , Peter Prinsley, Rachel Gilmour, Mary Glindon, Jen Craft, Paulette Hamilton, Anna Dixon and Josh Fenton-Glynn - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 19th March 2026
Report - 7th Report - Community Mental Health Services: Commentary on the Government Response to the Committee’s Fourth Report of the Session 2024–26 Health and Social Care Committee Found: Labour; Chelsea and Fulham) Dr Beccy Cooper (Labour; Worthing West) Jen Craft (Labour; Thurrock) Josh Fenton-Glynn |
|
Wednesday 11th March 2026
Oral Evidence - 2026-03-11 09:30:00+00:00 Health and Social Care Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Layla Moran (Chair); Danny Beales; Ben Coleman; Jen Craft; Josh Fenton-Glynn |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 18th March 2026 2 p.m. Health and Social Care Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 18th March 2026 9:15 a.m. Health and Social Care Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Delivering health aspects of Education Health and Care Plans View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 17th March 2026 1:15 p.m. Health and Social Care Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 25th March 2026 9:15 a.m. Health and Social Care Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Food and Weight Management View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 24th March 2026 1:15 p.m. Health and Social Care Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |