Debates between John Whittingdale and Lyn Brown during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Olympics and Paralympics (Funding)

Debate between John Whittingdale and Lyn Brown
Monday 27th February 2012

(12 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
John Whittingdale Portrait Mr Whittingdale
- Hansard - -

Yes, I basically do agree with my hon. Friend, but the financing of the Olympics seemed to me a legitimate use of lottery funding, because it is a sporting event and that was one of the four good causes that the lottery was originally established to fund.

Lyn Brown Portrait Lyn Brown (West Ham) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the hon. Gentleman accept that the area of east London that the money in question is helping to regenerate was in desperate need, and that if we had not had the Olympics, the regeneration of that area may have taken decades more? Does he agree that the economic development of an area that was quite blighted is a wider and possibly more important issue than reimbursing the lottery?

John Whittingdale Portrait Mr Whittingdale
- Hansard - -

I completely accept the hon. Lady’s point. Indeed, that was one of the principal motivations for making the bid in the first place, and the Olympics will plainly have a dramatic effect on the area. A number of members of the Culture, Media and Sport Committee visited the Olympic park in January, and it is absolutely extraordinary. The sporting facilities are world class, and I hope that they will have a lasting benefit and bring up the whole area in the way that she describes.

--- Later in debate ---
John Whittingdale Portrait Mr Whittingdale
- Hansard - -

I may come to regret giving that guarantee.

I understand that this issue is a cause for concern, but LOCOG has done as much as it can to ensure that everybody who really wants to attend the games will have the opportunity to do so.

I do not want to spend a great deal more time speaking. I shall merely note the two big challenges, which have already been raised. The first is security, which we have talked about at some length. Obviously the climate has changed since the original budget was set, but the issue will always be a matter of some concern, and I am sure that the Minister will want to say something about it. The second challenge is transport, which I know has occupied the attention of the Government; indeed, it has also caused some concern to the Committee. Even if we achieve the target of reducing journeys on the part of commuters and businesses by 20% on the busiest days—asking people to change their habits to that extent is quite a demanding target—that will still, we are told, lead to half-hour delays in getting on tube trains at certain stations. That is a measure of the difficulty that the issue has caused. Indeed, if there is one issue that is causing the most anxiety to those responsible for preparing for the games, it is transport, so I am sure that the Minister will want to say a bit more about it.

John Whittingdale Portrait Mr Whittingdale
- Hansard - -

I will give way for the last time.

Lyn Brown Portrait Lyn Brown
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I should say that I am off to a European Committee shortly, so I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for the opportunity to get in quickly on the issue of transport. One of the biggest issues—which we are yet to resolve—for the community living around the stadium is which roads will be open and what special arrangements will be made for that community. Resolution of this issue is now desperately needed, and I hope that this afternoon’s debate might shed some light on that.

John Whittingdale Portrait Mr Whittingdale
- Hansard - -

I am sure that the Minister has heard the hon. Lady’s point and will attempt to shed some light on it, if possible.