Debates between Jo Stevens and Iain Duncan Smith during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Jo Stevens and Iain Duncan Smith
Monday 7th December 2015

(8 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jo Stevens Portrait Jo Stevens (Cardiff Central) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

T1. If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities.

Iain Duncan Smith Portrait The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Mr Iain Duncan Smith)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am pleased to be able to update the House today on the next stage of universal credit roll-out. Universal credit is available now in three quarters of all jobcentres, and by April next year will be available nationally. Building on that, the digital service is already in a number of jobcentres, and I can announce that it is being extended to a further five jobcentres as early as next year—to Hounslow, Musselburgh, Purley, Thornton Heath and Great Yarmouth prior to May 2016, when the digital service will be rolled out nationally.

Jo Stevens Portrait Jo Stevens
- Hansard - -

I invite the Secretary of State to confirm that current claimants of universal credit will face losses next April as a result of cuts to the work allowance. Can he explain to the House why there is no transitional protection for universal credit, as there is for tax credit recipients?

Iain Duncan Smith Portrait Mr Duncan Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thought I had made this clear, but I will make it clear again. For those already on universal credit, advisers will support them through the additional resources and the flexible support fund to ensure that their status remains the same. Those moving from tax credit to universal credit are transitionally protected, as has already been stated.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Jo Stevens and Iain Duncan Smith
Monday 7th September 2015

(9 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jo Stevens Portrait Jo Stevens (Cardiff Central) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

16. What representations he has received on changing the Government’s child poverty targets.

Iain Duncan Smith Portrait The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Mr Iain Duncan Smith)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

This Government are committed to working to eliminate child poverty and improve the life chances of children. Our approach is to focus on the root causes of poverty and not just on the symptoms, which will deliver the best improvement in children’s life chances. Our consultation on child poverty measurement in 2013 received more than 250 responses, capturing views across the spectrum from local authorities, charities, academics and members of the public.

Iain Duncan Smith Portrait Mr Duncan Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am surprised that the hon. Gentleman did not notice that at the time of the Budget my right hon. Friend the Chancellor announced one of the biggest rises in the living wage. I make no apology for punching the air, because that was a huge announcement. This is the whole point: as we get people back to work, they should be earning more in work—rather than being paid for by taxpayers, they should be paid for by their businesses.

Jo Stevens Portrait Jo Stevens
- Hansard - -

Can the Secretary of State explain why the Government are scrapping all child poverty targets?

Iain Duncan Smith Portrait Mr Duncan Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are not scrapping all the child poverty targets; what we have said is that we are going to look at all the life chances measures. We want to know what they are doing and how well they are performing. Alongside that, we are still publishing income measures; HBAI statistics—households below average income—will still be published. The hon. Lady is therefore wrong in what she says. What we are doing is focusing on what we can actually do to help families get out of poverty, rather than rotating them around a 60% median income line, as the last Labour Government did. That did not make any sense and cost a huge amount of money.