Information between 15th May 2025 - 4th June 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 98 |
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 168 |
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 68 |
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 98 |
16 May 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 200 Labour No votes vs 129 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 279 |
16 May 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 206 Labour Aye votes vs 127 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 239 |
21 May 2025 - Immigration - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 242 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 267 |
21 May 2025 - Business and the Economy - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 246 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 253 |
22 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 191 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 195 Noes - 124 |
3 Jun 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 317 Noes - 185 |
3 Jun 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 101 |
3 Jun 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 180 |
3 Jun 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Jo Platt voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 184 |
Speeches |
---|
Jo Platt speeches from: Dementia Care
Jo Platt contributed 1 speech (595 words) Tuesday 3rd June 2025 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
Jo Platt speeches from: Business of the House
Jo Platt contributed 1 speech (66 words) Thursday 22nd May 2025 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
Jo Platt speeches from: Access to NHS Dentistry
Jo Platt contributed 1 speech (395 words) Thursday 22nd May 2025 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
Written Answers |
---|
Credit Unions: Finance
Asked by: Jo Platt (Labour (Co-op) - Leigh and Atherton) Tuesday 20th May 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if he will request that the British Business Bank make an assessment of the potential merits of support for a central finance facility for credit unions. Answered by Gareth Thomas - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) Credit Unions offer vital support, advice, and affordable finance to members. While there are no immediate plans for a central finance facility for Credit Unions, the government is committed to supporting underserved communities in all the nations and regions of the UK. In December 2024, the British Business Bank launched the Community Enable Funding programme, which is aimed at Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) serving smaller businesses in underserved communities. Unlike Credit Unions, CDFIs are unable to raise customer deposits and so this central financial facility is expected to boost the growth of the social lending sector. |
Gift Aid
Asked by: Jo Platt (Labour (Co-op) - Leigh and Atherton) Friday 23rd May 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what information her Department holds on the number of times the guidance set out in the Fundraising Regulator’s Code of Fundraising Practice on (a) fee transparency on charging commission on Gift Aid and (b) giving equal prominence to a zero fee or tip option has been breached in each of the last three years. Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) Fundraising platforms are commercial organisations that provide an important service to charities and donors. Many charities ask online fundraising platforms to claim Gift Aid on donations made on their platform for the charity, and pay a fee for this service to be provided because it is cost effective and efficient to do so. No estimate has been made at this time on the potential impact of banning the charging commission on Gift Aid on revenues to charities. Most platforms are registered with the Fundraising Regulator, which is the independent, non-statutory regulator of charitable fundraising in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Fundraising Regulator’s new Code of Fundraising Practice, which will come into force on 1 November 2025, includes requirements for fundraising platforms to include information for donors about how fees, including any voluntary tips, are calculated. The Fundraising Regulator will engage with fundraising platforms to ensure they are clear on the new transparency requirements for fees and tipping sliders before the new Code comes into effect. DCMS does not hold information centrally about breaches of the Code of Fundraising Practice. The below information was provided by the Fundraising Regulator. The Fundraising Regulator issued guidance for fundraising platforms on 17 February 2023.To date since the guidance was published, the Regulator has closed a total of 20 cases where there were complaints about a "tip" being taken by a platform. None involved a breach of the Code because information about fees, including the tip, was provided even if it could have been clearer or made easier for donors to choose not to tip. In the same period, there were seven complaints relating to Gift Aid but none were about commissions, fees or tips on fundraising platforms so there was no breach of the Code. DCMS will continue working with the Fundraising Regulator, charities, and online giving platforms to support best practice across all forms of charitable fundraising.
|
Charities: Fundraising
Asked by: Jo Platt (Labour (Co-op) - Leigh and Atherton) Friday 23rd May 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what steps she is taking to help ensure compliance with the Fundraising Regulator's Code of Fundraising Practice on the transparency of fees on fundraising platforms. Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) Fundraising platforms are commercial organisations that provide an important service to charities and donors. Many charities ask online fundraising platforms to claim Gift Aid on donations made on their platform for the charity, and pay a fee for this service to be provided because it is cost effective and efficient to do so. No estimate has been made at this time on the potential impact of banning the charging commission on Gift Aid on revenues to charities. Most platforms are registered with the Fundraising Regulator, which is the independent, non-statutory regulator of charitable fundraising in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Fundraising Regulator’s new Code of Fundraising Practice, which will come into force on 1 November 2025, includes requirements for fundraising platforms to include information for donors about how fees, including any voluntary tips, are calculated. The Fundraising Regulator will engage with fundraising platforms to ensure they are clear on the new transparency requirements for fees and tipping sliders before the new Code comes into effect. DCMS does not hold information centrally about breaches of the Code of Fundraising Practice. The below information was provided by the Fundraising Regulator. The Fundraising Regulator issued guidance for fundraising platforms on 17 February 2023.To date since the guidance was published, the Regulator has closed a total of 20 cases where there were complaints about a "tip" being taken by a platform. None involved a breach of the Code because information about fees, including the tip, was provided even if it could have been clearer or made easier for donors to choose not to tip. In the same period, there were seven complaints relating to Gift Aid but none were about commissions, fees or tips on fundraising platforms so there was no breach of the Code. DCMS will continue working with the Fundraising Regulator, charities, and online giving platforms to support best practice across all forms of charitable fundraising.
|
Charities: Gift Aid
Asked by: Jo Platt (Labour (Co-op) - Leigh and Atherton) Friday 23rd May 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, whether she has made an estimate of the potential impact of banning the charging commission on Gift Aid on revenues to charities. Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) Fundraising platforms are commercial organisations that provide an important service to charities and donors. Many charities ask online fundraising platforms to claim Gift Aid on donations made on their platform for the charity, and pay a fee for this service to be provided because it is cost effective and efficient to do so. No estimate has been made at this time on the potential impact of banning the charging commission on Gift Aid on revenues to charities. Most platforms are registered with the Fundraising Regulator, which is the independent, non-statutory regulator of charitable fundraising in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Fundraising Regulator’s new Code of Fundraising Practice, which will come into force on 1 November 2025, includes requirements for fundraising platforms to include information for donors about how fees, including any voluntary tips, are calculated. The Fundraising Regulator will engage with fundraising platforms to ensure they are clear on the new transparency requirements for fees and tipping sliders before the new Code comes into effect. DCMS does not hold information centrally about breaches of the Code of Fundraising Practice. The below information was provided by the Fundraising Regulator. The Fundraising Regulator issued guidance for fundraising platforms on 17 February 2023.To date since the guidance was published, the Regulator has closed a total of 20 cases where there were complaints about a "tip" being taken by a platform. None involved a breach of the Code because information about fees, including the tip, was provided even if it could have been clearer or made easier for donors to choose not to tip. In the same period, there were seven complaints relating to Gift Aid but none were about commissions, fees or tips on fundraising platforms so there was no breach of the Code. DCMS will continue working with the Fundraising Regulator, charities, and online giving platforms to support best practice across all forms of charitable fundraising.
|
Fundraising: Profits
Asked by: Jo Platt (Labour (Co-op) - Leigh and Atherton) Tuesday 27th May 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what information her Department holds on the level of profits earned by social fundraising platforms from charging commission on Gift Aid in the last 12 months. Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The Government recognises the vital role played by the charity sector and the generosity of the British public. That is why we support charitable giving with over £1.6billion in Gift Aid each year. Charities have the flexibility to decide on their own strategy for fundraising and are free to partner with other organisations to process their Gift Aid claims. It will ultimately be a commercial decision on the part of a charity to work with a fundraising platform and whether it is appropriate to pay a fee for any services provided. The Government does not provide financial support or subsidies to social fundraising platforms
|
Children: Maintenance
Asked by: Jo Platt (Labour (Co-op) - Leigh and Atherton) Tuesday 3rd June 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of including directors’ dividends in the initial calculation of child maintenance payments. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) Information about the paying parent's gross income is taken directly from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for the latest tax year available. This allows calculations to be made quickly and accurately. Any income subject to income tax, including bonuses and overtime received by an employed paying parent, is included within their gross weekly income when calculating a child maintenance liability.
Where a paying parent is the Director of their limited liability company, they are legally an employee of that company and are treated the same as any other employee for child maintenance purposes. If the receiving parent believes that the paying parent has additional income from dividends, they can apply for a variation to take this into account.
Variations can be requested on grounds of unearned income, where the paying parent receives extra unearned income of at least £2,500 a year. This includes rental income from property or land, dividends, and interest from savings and investments.
Cases involving complex income can be investigated by the Financial Investigation Unit (FIU). This is a specialist team which can request information from financial institutions (such as banks, investment companies and mortgage companies) to check the accuracy of information the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) is given.
The Child Maintenance Service has committed to reviewing the child maintenance calculation to make sure it fits current and future social trends. This review looks at fairness, family relations, sustainability, compliance, simplifying rates, work progression, including unearned income and assets, and how it interacts with other policies, such as Universal Credit.
|
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Access to NHS Dentistry
72 speeches (11,936 words) Thursday 22nd May 2025 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care Mentions: 1: Karin Smyth (Lab - Bristol South) Friend the Member for Leigh and Atherton (Jo Platt) made clear. - Link to Speech |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Thursday 22nd May 2025
Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes of the Modernisation Committee in Session 2024-25 Modernisation Committee Found: Sarah Coombes Kirith Entwistle Marie Goldman Paulette Hamilton Joy Morrissey Chris Philp Jo Platt |
Tuesday 20th May 2025
Attendance statistics - Members attendance as at 9 April 2025 Modernisation Committee Found: Norman (Conservative, Hereford and South Herefordshire) (added 18 Nov 2024) 7 of 11 (63.6%) Jo Platt |
Bill Documents |
---|
May. 23 2025
All proceedings up to 22 May 2025 at Public Bill Committee Stage Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26 Bill proceedings: Commons Found: Cooper Anna Dixon Connor Naismith Leigh Ingham Mrs Sarah Russell Daniel Francis Amanda Hack Jo Platt |
May. 23 2025
All proceedings up to 22 May 2025 at Public Bill Committee Stage Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26 Bill proceedings: Commons Found: Cooper Anna Dixon Connor Naismith Leigh Ingham Mrs Sarah Russell Daniel Francis Amanda Hack Jo Platt |
May. 22 2025
Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 22 May 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Cooper Anna Dixon Connor Naismith Leigh Ingham Mrs Sarah Russell Daniel Francis Amanda Hack Jo Platt |
May. 21 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 21 May 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Cooper Anna Dixon Connor Naismith Leigh Ingham Mrs Sarah Russell Daniel Francis Amanda Hack Jo Platt |
May. 20 2025
Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 20 May 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Cooper Anna Dixon Connor Naismith Leigh Ingham Mrs Sarah Russell Daniel Francis Amanda Hack Jo Platt |
May. 19 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 19 May 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Cooper Anna Dixon Connor Naismith Leigh Ingham Mrs Sarah Russell Daniel Francis Amanda Hack Jo Platt |
May. 16 2025
Notices of Amendments as at 16 May 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Cooper Anna Dixon Connor Naismith Leigh Ingham Mrs Sarah Russell Daniel Francis Amanda Hack Jo Platt |
Calendar |
---|
Tuesday 3rd June 2025 9:30 a.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Game On: Community and school sport At 10:00am: Oral evidence Huw Edwards - Chief Executive at UKactive Robert Sullivan - Chief Executive at Football Foundation Witness (TBC) - tbc at Lawn Tennis Association At 11:00am: Oral evidence Tim Hollingsworth OBE - Chief Executive at Sport England View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 3rd June 2025 9:30 a.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Game On: Community and school sport At 10:00am: Oral evidence Huw Edwards - Chief Executive at UKactive Robert Sullivan - Chief Executive at Football Foundation At 11:00am: Oral evidence Tim Hollingsworth OBE - Chief Executive at Sport England View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 3rd June 2025 9:30 a.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Game On: Community and school sport At 10:00am: Oral evidence Huw Edwards - Chief Executive at UKactive Robert Sullivan - Chief Executive at Football Foundation Councillor Peter Mason - Leader, London Borough of Ealing at Local Government Association At 11:00am: Oral evidence Tim Hollingsworth OBE - Chief Executive at Sport England View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 3rd June 2025 9:30 a.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Game On: Community and school sport At 10:00am: Oral evidence Huw Edwards - Chief Executive at UKactive Councillor Peter Mason - Leader, London Borough of Ealing at Local Government Association Robert Sullivan - Chief Executive at Football Foundation At 11:00am: Oral evidence Tim Hollingsworth OBE - Chief Executive at Sport England View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 10th June 2025 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures At 11:40am: Oral evidence Dr Ruth Fox - Director at Hansard Society View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 10th June 2025 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures At 11:45am: Oral evidence Dr Ruth Fox - Director at Hansard Society View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 17th June 2025 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures At 11:45am: Oral evidence Professor Cristina Leston-Bandeira, University of Leeds View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 17th June 2025 9:30 a.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Protecting built heritage At 10:00am: Oral evidence Camilla Finlay - Director at Clews Architects Dr Tegwen Roberts - Former Heritage Action Zone Lead at Eldon Street (Barnsley) High Street Heritage Action Zone Professor Vanessa Toulmin - Chair at Morecambe Winter Gardens Preservation Trust At 11:00am: Oral evidence Ben Cowell OBE - Director General at Historic Houses Alice Loxton - Historian, Author and National Trust Ambassador Hilary McGrady - Director General at National Trust View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 17th June 2025 9:30 a.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Protecting built heritage At 10:00am: Oral evidence Camilla Finlay - Trustee at Royal Historic Palaces Dr Tegwen Roberts - former lead officer at Eldon Street High Street Heritage Action Zone Professor Vanessa Toulmin - Chair at Morecambe Winter Gardens Preservation Trust At 11:00am: Oral evidence Ben Cowell OBE - Director General at Historic Houses Alice Loxton - Ambassador at National Trust Hilary McGrady - Director General at National Trust View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 17th June 2025 9:30 a.m. Culture, Media and Sport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Protecting built heritage At 10:00am: Oral evidence Camilla Finlay - Director at Clews Architects Dr Tegwen Roberts - Former Heritage Action Zone Lead at Eldon Street (Barnsley) High Street Heritage Action Zone Professor Vanessa Toulmin - Chair at Morecambe Winter Gardens Preservation Trust At 11:00am: Oral evidence Ben Cowell OBE - Director General at Historic Houses Alice Loxton - Ambassador at National Trust Hilary McGrady - Director General at National Trust View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 17th June 2025 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures At 11:45am: Oral evidence Professor Cristina Leston-Bandeira, University of Leeds Dr Ekaterina Kolpinskaya, Senior Lecturer in British Politics, University of Exeter (Cornwall) Professor Elizabeth Evans, University of Southampton View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 24th June 2025 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Access to the House of Commons and its Procedures At 11:45am: Oral evidence Gillian Rudd - Representative at Inclusive Parliament coalition Fazilet Hadi - Head of Policy at Disability Rights UK Ismail Kaji - Parliamentary and Government Engagement Officer at Mencap View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 2nd July 2025 5 p.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
4 Jun 2025
Fan-led review of music Culture, Media and Sport Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions A fan-led review of live music has been launched by MPs, with the aim of improving the sustainability of grassroots live and electronic music to safeguard the success of the wider UK music industry. The review will be undertaken by Lord Brennan of Canton, a member of the previous committee who published reports on the future of UK music festivals and economics of music streaming. The review will bring music lovers together to discuss ideas to protect the industry and ensure it works in the best interests of fans. It will consider the music fan experience, from the provision of live and electronic music through to considerations of safety, examine the sustainability of venues, and explore the barriers to touring faced by emerging artists. It will also look at the effectiveness of existing policies and how different levels of government support live music. The review, announced by Culture, Media and Sport Committee Chair Dame Caroline Dinenage at the SXSW London festival, was one of the recommendations from the predecessor committee’s report on grassroots music venues (paragraphs 20-23), published in the last Parliament. The report amplified concerns by venue operators, touring artists and independent promoters regarding the financial precarity of the grassroots music sector, with venues shutting at the rate of two a week and artists struggling to make tours viable. The committee also heard that fans are “massively underrepresented” in policymaking for the sector and concluded that “a comprehensive review of the live music ecosystem is needed to fully explore the long-term challenges and the interventions needed to protect it”. More information, including about how to get involved in the review, will be made available in due course on this page. |