Information between 2nd December 2025 - 1st January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 13th January 2026 9:30 a.m. James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Westminster Hall debate - Westminster Hall Subject: Potential merits of a statutory duty of care for universities View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 182 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 340 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 364 Noes - 167 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 347 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 164 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 176 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 346 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 369 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 357 Noes - 174 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 298 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 304 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 299 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 154 Noes - 303 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 162 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 96 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 162 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 395 Noes - 98 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 96 |
|
9 Dec 2025 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 332 |
|
9 Dec 2025 - UK-EU Customs Union (Duty to Negotiate) - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 13 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 100 Noes - 100 |
|
9 Dec 2025 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 173 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Seasonal Work - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 325 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Seasonal Work - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 98 |
|
15 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 96 |
|
17 Dec 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 165 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
James Naish speeches from: UK-EU Common Understanding Negotiations
James Naish contributed 1 speech (67 words) Wednesday 17th December 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
James Naish speeches from: Local Government Finance
James Naish contributed 1 speech (108 words) Wednesday 17th December 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
James Naish speeches from: National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill
James Naish contributed 1 speech (55 words) 2nd reading Wednesday 17th December 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
James Naish speeches from: NHS: Winter Preparedness
James Naish contributed 1 speech (68 words) Monday 15th December 2025 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
|
James Naish speeches from: Radcliffe-on-Trent to Cotgrave Greenway
James Naish contributed 1 speech (313 words) Monday 15th December 2025 - Commons Chamber |
|
James Naish speeches from: Net Zero Transition: Consumer-led Flexibility
James Naish contributed 2 speeches (130 words) Tuesday 9th December 2025 - Westminster Hall Department for Business and Trade |
|
James Naish speeches from: Official Secrets Act and Espionage
James Naish contributed 1 speech (46 words) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
James Naish speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
James Naish contributed 1 speech (64 words) Tuesday 2nd December 2025 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
|
James Naish speeches from: Budget Resolutions
James Naish contributed 2 speeches (149 words) Tuesday 2nd December 2025 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Students: Loans
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential (a) merits of calculating maintenance loans through net rather than gross household income and (b) impact of that change on single parental income households. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) Entitlement to partially means-tested undergraduate loans for living costs is based on the income of the student’s household. The income used is the total income on which a person is charged income tax at step 1 of the calculation in Section 23 of the Income Tax Act 2007, before the deductions made by HMRC from step 2 onwards of Section 23. The use of income charged to tax in the household income assessment applies a standard measure of income to calculate a student’s entitlement to living costs support and allows all students to be assessed consistently and fairly. It also ensures that the most support is paid to students from the lowest income families, including those with single parents, who need it most and who are historically under-represented in higher education. It is not intended to be an exact calculation of disposable income for each household. Information on income is available from HMRC and allows around 1.3 million assessments a year to be carried out quickly and efficiently each year by Student Finance England. Maximum grants and loans for living and other costs for the 2025/26 academic year have been increased by forecast inflation, 3.1%, based on the RPIX inflation index. |
|
Refugees: Syria
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Thursday 11th December 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether her Department will make an assessment of the potential impact of new immigration rules on people who arrived under the Syrian Vulnerable Person Resettlement Programme. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) In line with our Public Sector Equality Duty, Equality Impact Assessments are undertaken for new policies to ensure that there are no unintended or disproportionate impacts on people with protected characteristics. This includes consideration of nationalities. |
|
Students: Fees and Charges
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Friday 12th December 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of home tuition fee eligibility rules on British citizens who relocated to EU member states while the UK was part of the European Union; and whether she plans to review these rules to account for decisions made whilst the UK was still a member of the EU. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) UK nationals and their children living in the European Economic Area (EEA) or Switzerland, who wish to study in the UK, will be eligible for automatic home fee status and student support for courses starting up to seven years from the end of the transition period. The seven-year period ensures that eligible UK nationals and their children, whose normal place of residence is in the EEA or Switzerland but wish to undertake higher education in England, will still be able to access home fee status and student financial support immediately on their return to the UK during this time. From 1 January 2028, UK nationals and their children must normally have been ordinarily resident in the UK and Islands (Channel Islands and the Isle of Man) for at least three years immediately before the start of their course to qualify for automatic home fee status and student support. |
|
Students: Fees and Charges
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Friday 12th December 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to address the difference in home fee status eligibility for siblings who are both British nationals where one child benefits from Withdrawal Agreement protections and another does not due to the timing of their university entry after 2028. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) UK nationals and their children living in the European Economic Area (EEA) or Switzerland, who wish to study in the UK, will be eligible for automatic home fee status and student support for courses starting up to seven years from the end of the transition period. The seven-year period ensures that eligible UK nationals and their children, whose normal place of residence is in the EEA or Switzerland but wish to undertake higher education in England, will still be able to access home fee status and student financial support immediately on their return to the UK during this time. From 1 January 2028, UK nationals and their children must normally have been ordinarily resident in the UK and Islands (Channel Islands and the Isle of Man) for at least three years immediately before the start of their course to qualify for automatic home fee status and student support. |
|
Students: Fees and Charges
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Friday 12th December 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department will consider introducing discretionary provisions within home tuition fee eligibility criteria for British nationals living abroad who can demonstrate genuine and ongoing connections to the UK but were unable to relocate prior to their children commencing university. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) To qualify for automatic home fee status and higher education student support, students must normally be settled in the UK and have been ordinarily resident in the UK and Islands for at least three years before their course begins. However, if a student has spent time overseas due to their own or a specified family member’s temporary employment abroad, this does not interrupt their ordinary residence in the UK, providing flexibility for those who have not made a long-term decision to live outside the UK. Decisions on whether a student meets the criteria for home fee status rest with higher education providers, which are independent and autonomous bodies. Student Finance England makes decisions about eligibility for student finance. |
|
Criminal Proceedings: DNA
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Thursday 11th December 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether his Department has made an estimate of the cost savings from expanding DNA testing in criminal trials. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The Ministry of Justice does not collect or hold data which would link the use of DNA testing, or any other type of evidence produced by the prosecution, with the overall efficiency of criminal trials. Therefore, it is not possible to make an estimate of any cost savings. |
|
Bus Services: Fares
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Tuesday 16th December 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her department has made an assessment of the potential merits of extending the beginning of the statutory time period of 9.30am nationally during weekdays for concessionary bus pass holders. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The English National Concessionary Travel Scheme (ENCTS) provides free off-peak bus travel to those with eligible disabilities and those of state pension age. The ENCTS costs around £795 million annually and any changes to the statutory obligations, such as extending the travel times, would need to be carefully considered for its impact on the scheme’s financial sustainability.
However, local authorities in England have the power to offer concessions in addition to their statutory obligations, including by extending travel times. These are additional local concessions provided and funded by local authorities from local resources.
The Government is investing in bus services long-term and has confirmed over £3 billion from 2026/27 to support local leaders and bus operators across the country to improve bus services over the remainder of the spending review period. This includes multi-year allocations for local authorities under the Local Authority Bus Grant (LABG) totalling nearly £700 million per year.
The East Midlands Combined Authority will be allocated £65.5 million under the LABG from 2026/27 to 2028/29, in addition to the £21.7 million they are already receiving this year. Funding allocated to local authorities to improve services can be used in whichever way they wish to deliver better services for passengers, including funding discretionary concessions. |
|
Game: Gun Sports
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Thursday 18th December 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of bringing in vicarious liability for landowners to reduce grouse shooting. Answered by Mary Creagh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The introduction of new regulation, such as vicarious liability, requires evidence that it will be effective. Vicarious liability occurs where one person can be held liable for the actions of another person. With regards to grouse shooting, this could mean a manager or employer would be held criminally liable for an unlawful act perpetrated by a member of their staff, for example the unlawful killing of birds of prey. Vicarious liability for such acts has been introduced in Scotland but so far there is no compelling evidence to show that its introduction has had a significant deterrent effect on those who persecute wildlife.
We will continue to monitor the situation in Scotland to consider whether vicarious liability is a necessary and proportionate approach in tackling wildlife crime in England.
|
|
Palliative Care
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Tuesday 30th December 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of publishing a national strategy for (a) palliative and (b) end of life care. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government is developing a Palliative Care and End of Life Care Modern Service Framework for England. I refer the hon. member to the Written Ministerial Statement HCWS1087 I gave to the House on 24 November 2025. The MSF will drive improvements in the services that patients and their families receive at the end of life and will enable integrated care boards to address challenges in access, quality, and sustainability through the delivery of high-quality, personalised care. This will be aligned with the ambitions set out in the recently published 10-Year Health Plan. |
|
Rape: Drugs
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Tuesday 23rd December 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether her Department has considered reclassifying date rape drugs such as flunitrazepam and gamma-hydroxybutyrate as weapons. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) and Flunitrazepam are controlled drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. GHB, and the related substances Gamma-Butyrolactone (GBL) and 1,4-Butanediol (1,4-BD), were reclassified from Class C to Class B in 2022, in line with advice from the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (‘ACMD’). Flunitrazepam is controlled as a Class C drug in common with other benzodiazepines. Ministers are obliged to consider advice from the ACMD before making to changes to the classification of drugs. The Government has no current plans to reclassify these drugs. |
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
15th December 2025
James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) 2. Donations and other support (including loans) for activities as an MP The Fusion Cluster - £1,678.00 Source |
|
15th December 2025
James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) 3. Gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources Nottingham Forest Football Club Limited - £640.00 Source |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
15 Dec 2025, 4:28 p.m. - House of Commons " James Naish thank you, Mr. Speaker. I've said to Hanukkah " James Naish MP (Rushcliffe, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
15 Dec 2025, 9:44 p.m. - House of Commons "petitions. Petition James Naish. " Chris Bryant MP, Minister of State (Department for Business and Trade) (Rhondda and Ogmore, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Dec 2025, 4:40 p.m. - House of Commons " James Naish. " Alison McGovern MP, Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Birkenhead, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Dec 2025, 3:09 p.m. - House of Commons " James Naish. says. >> Was one liner Lib Dem campaigning works. I don't think so. It's this Labour government that " James Naish MP (Rushcliffe, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 19th January 2026 2:30 p.m. Department for Education Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Education Rachel Blake: What steps she is taking to ensure that families of children with SEND have early access to support. Blake Stephenson: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Gareth Snell: What estimate her Department has made of the number of young people enrolled on A-levels and T-levels in September 2026. Lauren Edwards: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Caroline Voaden: What steps her Department is taking to improve teacher retention. Jon Pearce: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Steve Yemm: What steps she is taking to help ensure the integrity of school and college assessments and examinations. Sarah Owen: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Joe Powell: What steps she is taking to introduce a Ukrainian GCSE. Alison Griffiths: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Chris Bloore: What assessment her Department has made of the effectiveness of powers to intervene where local authorities are not meeting statutory SEND duties. Bayo Alaba: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Tim Farron: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Darren Paffey: What steps she is taking to ensure that families of children with SEND have early access to support. Beccy Cooper: What assessment she has made of the potential impact of flu vaccination levels on rates of school absence in autumn 2025. Charlie Dewhirst: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Carla Denyer: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Michelle Scrogham: What steps she is taking to reduce variations in funding for SEND provision across local authorities. Laurence Turner: What recent progress her Department has made on establishing the School Support Staff Negotiating Body. Jim Dickson: If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities. Gregory Stafford: What plans her Department has to tackle the SEND funding shortfall identified in the OBR Economic and Fiscal Outlook November 2025. Rachel Taylor: What steps her Department is taking to help improve the governance of academy trusts. Rosie Duffield: What recent progress she has made on publishing guidance for gender questioning children in schools. Daniel Francis: What steps she is taking to ensure high-quality school places for children with SEND. Jacob Collier: What steps she is taking to ensure high-quality school places for children with SEND. Sarah Olney: Whether she has made an assessment of the potential impact of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill on levels of financial oversight for children’s care home providers. Marsha De Cordova: What assessment she has made of the adequacy of SEND provision for blind and partially sighted children. Liz Jarvis: What steps she is taking to ensure adequate funding to implement the recommendations of the Curriculum and Assessment Review. James Naish: If she will make an assessment of the potential merits of expanding home fees status to British citizens who relocated to the EU prior to the UK's withdrawal. Sarah Green: Whether she plans to update guidance on handling complaints in children's social care. Alex Sobel: Whether she has made an assessment of the potential merits of raising the minimum income threshold for student maintenance loans in line with inflation. Luke Charters: What steps she is taking with Cabinet colleagues to help improve the affordability of childcare. Gareth Bacon: What recent progress her Department has made on implementing the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023. Tulip Siddiq: What steps she is taking to help improve safeguarding practices in nurseries and early years settings. Caroline Dinenage: What assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of the use of smart phones in schools on levels of disruption in classrooms. View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Changing Places Facilities
0 speeches (None words) Thursday 18th December 2025 - Petitions Mentions: 1: None —[Presented by James Naish, Official Report, 12 November 2025; Vol. 775, c. 278.] - Link to Speech |
|
Net Zero Transition: Consumer-led Flexibility
35 speeches (8,619 words) Tuesday 9th December 2025 - Westminster Hall Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Jim Shannon (DUP - Strangford) Member for Rushcliffe (James Naish), if consumers can see it as part of what they want to achieve and - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 12th December 2025
Formal Minutes - Formal minutes 2024-25 Backbench Business Committee Found: Aquarone: Regional transport inequality • Sadik Al-Hassan: Enabling Hydrogen Powered Aviation • James Naish |
|
Tuesday 9th December 2025
Oral Evidence - Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, and Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office International Development Committee Found: Q29 James Naish: So it is effectively those three things. |
|
Thursday 4th December 2025
Special Report - 6th Special Report - The FCDO's approach to displaced people: Government response International Development Committee Found: Democrat; Melksham and Devizes) David Mundell (Conservative; Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale) James Naish |
|
Thursday 4th December 2025
Special Report - Large Print - 6th Special Report - The FCDO's approach to displaced people: Government response International Development Committee Found: ; Melksham and Devizes) David Mundell (Conservative; Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale) James Naish |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Oral Evidence - INGO Forum Nigeria, Action against Hunger, and UNHCR The UK’s development partnership with Nigeria - International Development Committee Found: meeting Members present: Sarah Champion (Chair); Janet Daby; Tracy Gilbert; Noah Law; David Mundell; James Naish |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Oral Evidence - Mary Dinah Foundation, WaterAid Nigeria, and ActionAid Nigeria The UK’s development partnership with Nigeria - International Development Committee Found: meeting Members present: Sarah Champion (Chair); Janet Daby; Tracy Gilbert; Noah Law; David Mundell; James Naish |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 16th December 2025 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Women, peace and security At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Chris Elmore MP - Parliamentary Under-Secretary at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Alistair Carns DSO OBE MC MP - Minister for Armed Forces at Ministry of Defence Stuart Mills - Deputy Director Global Issues at Ministry of Defence Emily Maltman - Head of Gender and Children in Conflict Department at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 13th January 2026 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The UK’s development partnership with Nigeria At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Hamsatu Allamin - Founder at Allamin Foundation for Peace and Development Saratu Joshua Pindar - Country Programme Co-ordinator at CIVIC Aisha Abdurrahman - Chief Executive at Bridge for Women Development Initiative (BOWDI) At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Bryan Weiner - Senior Regional Programme Manager, West Africa at Search for Common Ground Tog Gang - Senior Advisor for Peace and Conflict at Mercy Corps View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 20th January 2026 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Future of UK aid and development assistance At 2:00pm: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State for International Development and Africa at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Melinda Bohannon - Director General, Humanitarian and Development at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
3 Dec 2025
The UK’s International Climate Finance International Development Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions UK ICF was launched in 2011 as Official Development Assistance (ODA). It plays a crucial role in fulfilling the UK’s obligations under the Paris Climate Agreement and advancing the Government’s wider ambition to establish the UK as a global leader in international climate action. In 2019, the previous Government announced its commitment to spend £11.6 billion in ICF in the five years to 2025-26. The UK’s 2023 ICF strategy outlined four priority areas for the funding: clean energy; nature for climate and people; adaptation and resilience; and sustainable cities, infrastructure and transport. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) and three other Government departments – the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ); Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra); and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) – have responsibility for funding and delivering ICF. While the UK remains committed to achieving its target by March 2026, major cuts to ODA by successive governments and competing demands on UK aid have exacerbated pressures. The Independent Commission for Aid’s (ICAI’s) 2024 rapid review of the UK’s current ICF portfolio highlighted that reaching the target is now dependent on changes to accounting methodology to dilute the ICF target. Specifically, it found that by reclassifying existing ODA as ICF, the UK has “moved the goalpost”, allowing more aid spending to be counted as ICF while not increasing the amounts which reach countries in need. Moreover, as at October 2025, the Climate Action Tracker (CAT), rated the UK’s ICF as “highly insufficient”. CAT has highlighted that the UK needs to “substantially increase” ICF to ensure that it is contributing an equitable share to global climate mitigation efforts. As the UK prepares to renew its commitment for the 2026-2030 ICF period, the Government faces challenges to ICF delivery in the context of shifting international priorities, funding restraints and changes in the humanitarian and development sector. This inquiry will consider the effectiveness of the UK’s current ICF portfolio in driving systemic change and crucially, how it can maximise value for money and impact by learning lessons and leveraging alternative routes to fulfil its future commitments despite reduced resources. Join the conversation on X using @CommonsIDC
|