Information between 22nd March 2025 - 1st April 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 303 |
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 304 |
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 137 Noes - 304 |
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 307 |
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 41 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 62 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 306 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 170 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 302 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 167 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 305 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 167 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 104 |
31 Mar 2025 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 164 |
24 Mar 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 322 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 74 |
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 192 |
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 190 |
25 Mar 2025 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 198 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 166 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 180 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 179 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 180 |
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 313 Noes - 194 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 117 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 183 |
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 196 |
Speeches |
---|
James Naish speeches from: Bosnia and Herzegovina
James Naish contributed 1 speech (85 words) Monday 31st March 2025 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
James Naish speeches from: Great British Energy Bill
James Naish contributed 1 speech (685 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Tuesday 25th March 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
James Naish speeches from: European Union: UK Membership
James Naish contributed 4 speeches (868 words) Monday 24th March 2025 - Westminster Hall Cabinet Office |
Written Answers |
---|
Animal and Plant Health Agency: ICT
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Tuesday 25th March 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what recent assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of the capability of the Animal and Plant Health Agency IT equipment. Answered by Daniel Zeichner - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The APHA and Defra leadership teams have benefited from internal audits undertaken each year which look at issues including spend, governance, resilience, cyber security, and asset management. Additional insight into the need for investment in the APHA's IT capability has also come from 3 recent Government Internal Audit Agency audits on; Disaster Recovery, Cyber Security and a more targeted APHA Shadow IT Audit. |
Animal and Plant Health Agency: Disease Control
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Tuesday 25th March 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether the Animal and Plant Health Agency has carried out scenario planning for potential (a) outbreaks of foot and mouth disease and (b) other significant biosecurity breaches. Answered by Daniel Zeichner - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Foot and mouth disease (FMD) scenario modelling has been completed, and initial outputs received. A report is being drafted with the deadline being end of March. APHA is undertaking assessments in relation to other diseases including ASF.
FMD scenario modelling has been carried out multiple times, for such reasons as Contingency Exercises (Exercise Rowan) and to support development of livestock traceability systems. The majority of APHA exercises are based around a plausible scenario, developed from expert opinion, and/or demonstrated incursion, and/or simulation model. Scenarios are designed to reflect plausible, whilst testing, conditions.
APHA have carried out assessments of the risk of incursion of FMD from the continent and publish these via GOV.UK. |
NHS: Private Sector
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Monday 31st March 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he has had discussions with Independent Sector Providers on ensuring that staff (a) who deliver NHS services and (b) whose contracts do not include automatic pay uplifts receive any agreed pay uplifts as soon as possible. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) My Rt Hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has not held any discussions with independent providers on this topic. Independent organisations, such as social enterprises and general practices, are free to develop and adapt their own terms and conditions of employment. This includes the pay scales that they use, the extent to which pay awards are made, and when those awards are paid. |
Prescriptions
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Monday 31st March 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he is taking steps to ensure that the Community Pharmacy Independent Prescribing Pathfinder Programme and independent prescribing generally will continue to be supported to maximise direct prescribing capability in England. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The NHS England Pathfinder programme is running across England with the aim of developing a commissioning framework for community pharmacy clinical services with independent prescribing (IP) for National Health Service patients. We are working with integrated care boards and pathfinder sites, community pharmacies, to understand the key enablers for IP to be incorporated into community pharmacy. The programme learning will be across five key domains: clinical; digital; governance and safety; people; and funding and contracts. We hope to complete our evaluation by Autumn 2025, and to use this to inform planning for the incorporation of prescribing into community pharmacy clinical services. Further information on the NHS England Pathfinder programme is available at the following link: https://www.england.nhs.uk/primary-care/pharmacy/pharmacy-integration-fund/independent-prescribing/ |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
European Union: UK Membership
138 speeches (26,696 words) Monday 24th March 2025 - Westminster Hall Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: James MacCleary (LD - Lewes) Members for Chelsea and Fulham (Ben Coleman), for Macclesfield (Tim Roca), for Rushcliffe (James Naish - Link to Speech 2: Abena Oppong-Asare (Lab - Erith and Thamesmead) Friend the Member for Rushcliffe (James Naish) said in urging the Government to think creatively. - Link to Speech |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Tuesday 25th March 2025
Oral Evidence - House of Commons The FCDO's approach to value for money - International Development Committee Found: Members present: Sarah Champion (Chair); Tracy Gilbert; Noah Law; Brian Mathew; David Mundell; James Naish |
Tuesday 25th March 2025
Oral Evidence - Action Through Enterprise The FCDO's approach to value for money - International Development Committee Found: Members present: Sarah Champion (Chair); Tracy Gilbert; Noah Law; Brian Mathew; David Mundell; James Naish |
Tuesday 25th March 2025
Written Evidence - James Naish MP LISA0182 - Lifetime ISA Treasury Committee Found: LISA0182 - Lifetime ISA James Naish MP Written Evidence |
Bill Documents |
---|
Mar. 12 2025
All proceedings up to 12 March 2025 at Report Stage Employment Rights Bill 2024-26 Bill proceedings: Commons Found: Trickett Anna Sabine Mike Martin Lizzi Collinge Jayne Kirkham Munira Wilson Gill Furniss James Naish |
Calendar |
---|
Tuesday 1st April 2025 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The FCDO's approach to displaced people At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Daphne Jayasinghe - Director of Policy – Global Protracted Displacement Team at International Rescue Committee Bethan Lewis - Head of humanitarian unit at Plan International UK Gideon Rabinowitz - Director of policy and advocacy at Bond At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Dr Jessica Hagen-Zanker - Head of the migration and displacement hub at ODI Global Louis Hoffmann - Senior Coordinator for Peace, Recovery and Solutions at International Organization for Migration View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 1st April 2025 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The FCDO's approach to displaced people At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Daphne Jayasinghe - Director of Policy – Global Protracted Displacement Team at International Rescue Committee Bethan Lewis - Head of humanitarian unit at Plan International UK Gideon Rabinowitz - Director of policy and advocacy at Bond At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Dr Jessica Hagen-Zanker - Head of the migration and displacement hub at ODI Global Louis Hoffmann - Senior Coordinator for Peace, Recovery and Solutions at International Organization for Migration Hélène Kuperman-Le-Bihan - Head of MAG Europe at Mines Advisory Group View calendar - Add to calendar |
Tuesday 1st April 2025 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The FCDO's approach to displaced people View calendar - Add to calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
8 Apr 2025
Aid for community-led energy International Development Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 16 May 2025) Energy lies at the core of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Yet, the international community remains largely off track in meeting these commitments. According to the International Energy Agency, around 750 million people lack access to electricity, and more than 2 billion people lack access to clean cooking fuels, predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa. Future energy systems need to be renewable, inclusive, and resilient. Decentralised energy, where generation and governance occur closer to the point of use, is gaining traction as a way to achieve these goals. ‘Community energy’ is one approach within this broader shift, ensuring that people play a central role in decision-making and ownership. Whether through local control or collective governance, these systems give communities a direct stake in their energy future. More broadly, decentralised energy models, ranging from cooperative solar projects to independent microgrids, can accelerate the deployment of renewables and generate significant local socio-economic benefits. However, challenges such as financing constraints, technical capacity, and regulatory hurdles continue to limit their expansion. This inquiry will explore locally led development in the context of energy systems. It will assess the UK Government’s role in addressing global energy poverty while promoting clean energy and strengthening local communities abroad. It will seek to understand how much Official Development Assistance (ODA) supports localised energy projects, how effective and transformative this funding is, and where gaps exist in financing, technology, and capacity-building. It is interested in understanding the value-for-money of financing localised energy projects, accounting for their full environmental and social benefits. Join the conversation on X using @CommonsIDC |