Information between 30th November 2025 - 10th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 182 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 340 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 364 Noes - 167 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 347 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 164 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 176 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 346 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 369 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 357 Noes - 174 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 298 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 304 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 299 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 154 Noes - 303 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 162 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 96 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 162 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 395 Noes - 98 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 96 |
|
9 Dec 2025 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 332 |
|
9 Dec 2025 - UK-EU Customs Union (Duty to Negotiate) - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 13 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 100 Noes - 100 |
|
9 Dec 2025 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 173 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
James Naish speeches from: Net Zero Transition: Consumer-led Flexibility
James Naish contributed 2 speeches (130 words) Tuesday 9th December 2025 - Westminster Hall Department for Business and Trade |
|
James Naish speeches from: Official Secrets Act and Espionage
James Naish contributed 1 speech (46 words) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
James Naish speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
James Naish contributed 1 speech (64 words) Tuesday 2nd December 2025 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
|
James Naish speeches from: Budget Resolutions
James Naish contributed 2 speeches (149 words) Tuesday 2nd December 2025 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
|
James Naish speeches from: Budget Resolutions
James Naish contributed 4 speeches (145 words) Monday 1st December 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Students: Loans
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential (a) merits of calculating maintenance loans through net rather than gross household income and (b) impact of that change on single parental income households. Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) Entitlement to partially means-tested undergraduate loans for living costs is based on the income of the student’s household. The income used is the total income on which a person is charged income tax at step 1 of the calculation in Section 23 of the Income Tax Act 2007, before the deductions made by HMRC from step 2 onwards of Section 23. The use of income charged to tax in the household income assessment applies a standard measure of income to calculate a student’s entitlement to living costs support and allows all students to be assessed consistently and fairly. It also ensures that the most support is paid to students from the lowest income families, including those with single parents, who need it most and who are historically under-represented in higher education. It is not intended to be an exact calculation of disposable income for each household. Information on income is available from HMRC and allows around 1.3 million assessments a year to be carried out quickly and efficiently each year by Student Finance England. Maximum grants and loans for living and other costs for the 2025/26 academic year have been increased by forecast inflation, 3.1%, based on the RPIX inflation index. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
2 Dec 2025, 12:27 p.m. - House of Commons "threats. And we also take immensely seriously any threat issues to our national security from Iran. >> James Naish thank you, Mr. " Stephen Doughty MP, Minister of State (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) (Cardiff South and Penarth, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
2 Dec 2025, 12:27 p.m. - House of Commons ">> James Naish thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Minister. >> Will be aware of the work of the Westminster Foundation for democracy and other organisations " Stephen Doughty MP, Minister of State (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) (Cardiff South and Penarth, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Net Zero Transition: Consumer-led Flexibility
35 speeches (8,619 words) Tuesday 9th December 2025 - Westminster Hall Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Jim Shannon (DUP - Strangford) Member for Rushcliffe (James Naish), if consumers can see it as part of what they want to achieve and - Link to Speech |
|
Iconic Trees and Nature Education
2 speeches (1,483 words) Monday 1st December 2025 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: Joe Morris (Lab - Hexham) consigned to memory alone.Question put and agreed to.Ordered,That Joe Morris, Michael Wheeler, James Naish - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 4th December 2025
Special Report - 6th Special Report - The FCDO's approach to displaced people: Government response International Development Committee Found: Democrat; Melksham and Devizes) David Mundell (Conservative; Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale) James Naish |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Oral Evidence - INGO Forum Nigeria, Action against Hunger, and UNHCR The UK’s development partnership with Nigeria - International Development Committee Found: meeting Members present: Sarah Champion (Chair); Janet Daby; Tracy Gilbert; Noah Law; David Mundell; James Naish |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Oral Evidence - Mary Dinah Foundation, WaterAid Nigeria, and ActionAid Nigeria The UK’s development partnership with Nigeria - International Development Committee Found: meeting Members present: Sarah Champion (Chair); Janet Daby; Tracy Gilbert; Noah Law; David Mundell; James Naish |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 9th December 2025 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: FCDO Annual Report and Accounts 2024-25 At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Sir Oliver Robbins KCMG CB - Permanent Under-Secretary at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Nick Dyer - Second Permanent Under-Secretary at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Tim Jones - Finance Director at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 16th December 2025 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Women, peace and security At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Chris Elmore MP - Parliamentary Under-Secretary at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Alistair Carns DSO OBE MC MP - Minister for Armed Forces at Ministry of Defence Stuart Mills - Deputy Director Global Issues at Ministry of Defence Emily Maltman - Head of Gender and Children in Conflict Department at Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
3 Dec 2025
The UK’s International Climate Finance International Development Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions UK ICF was launched in 2011 as Official Development Assistance (ODA). It plays a crucial role in fulfilling the UK’s obligations under the Paris Climate Agreement and advancing the Government’s wider ambition to establish the UK as a global leader in international climate action. In 2019, the previous Government announced its commitment to spend £11.6 billion in ICF in the five years to 2025-26. The UK’s 2023 ICF strategy outlined four priority areas for the funding: clean energy; nature for climate and people; adaptation and resilience; and sustainable cities, infrastructure and transport. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) and three other Government departments – the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ); Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra); and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) – have responsibility for funding and delivering ICF. While the UK remains committed to achieving its target by March 2026, major cuts to ODA by successive governments and competing demands on UK aid have exacerbated pressures. The Independent Commission for Aid’s (ICAI’s) 2024 rapid review of the UK’s current ICF portfolio highlighted that reaching the target is now dependent on changes to accounting methodology to dilute the ICF target. Specifically, it found that by reclassifying existing ODA as ICF, the UK has “moved the goalpost”, allowing more aid spending to be counted as ICF while not increasing the amounts which reach countries in need. Moreover, as at October 2025, the Climate Action Tracker (CAT), rated the UK’s ICF as “highly insufficient”. CAT has highlighted that the UK needs to “substantially increase” ICF to ensure that it is contributing an equitable share to global climate mitigation efforts. As the UK prepares to renew its commitment for the 2026-2030 ICF period, the Government faces challenges to ICF delivery in the context of shifting international priorities, funding restraints and changes in the humanitarian and development sector. This inquiry will consider the effectiveness of the UK’s current ICF portfolio in driving systemic change and crucially, how it can maximise value for money and impact by learning lessons and leveraging alternative routes to fulfil its future commitments despite reduced resources. Join the conversation on X using @CommonsIDC
|