Information between 11th November 2025 - 21st November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 25th November 2025 9:30 a.m. James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Westminster Hall debate - Westminster Hall Subject: The potential impact of immigration reforms on humanitarian visa routes View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
12 Nov 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 316 |
|
12 Nov 2025 - Energy - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 336 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 132 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 238 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 254 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 125 |
|
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 250 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 318 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 318 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 327 |
|
18 Nov 2025 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 105 |
|
19 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 92 |
|
20 Nov 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16 |
|
20 Nov 2025 - Telecommunications - View Vote Context James Naish voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 376 Noes - 16 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
James Naish speeches from: Illegal Waste: Organised Crime
James Naish contributed 1 speech (57 words) Monday 17th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
|
James Naish speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
James Naish contributed 1 speech (67 words) Wednesday 12th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
James Naish speeches from: Energy
James Naish contributed 4 speeches (183 words) Wednesday 12th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
|
James Naish speeches from: Petitions
James Naish contributed 1 speech (209 words) Wednesday 12th November 2025 - Commons Chamber |
|
James Naish speeches from: Nolan Principles
James Naish contributed 1 speech (77 words) Wednesday 12th November 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Child Maintenance Service: Fees and Charges
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Friday 14th November 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps his Department is taking to ensure the Child Maintenance Service provides proof, if requested, of calculations of collection fees. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) The Department is committed to ensuring transparency in the operation of the Child Maintenance Service (CMS).
The CMS provides two service types: Direct Pay, where parents arrange payments between themselves, and Collect and Pay, where the CMS calculates the liability and manages the transfer of funds. Collection fees only apply to the Collect and Pay service. A fee of 20% is added to what the paying parent needs to pay, while 4% is deducted from maintenance paid to receiving parents.
For cases on the Collect and Pay service, details of what collection fees apply and how they are calculated are included in notifications sent to customers whenever there is a change to their child maintenance calculation. Customers can also view additional information about their payments and child maintenance calculation by accessing their online Child Maintenance account.
|
|
Child Maintenance Service
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Friday 14th November 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that the Child Maintenance Service do not send arrears letters to people who pay on time. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) Robust processes are in place to ensure correspondence issued by the Child Maintenance Service (CMS) is accurate and reflects each customer’s payment status. CMS systems monitor compliance of expected payments and where payments are not made in full and on time, arrears or missed payment notifications will be issued. Where a payment has been made in full and on time, no arrears letter should be sent.
The CMS are committed to modernising and regularly reviews processes and updates guidance to staff to minimise errors and improve accuracy.
|
|
Crisis and Resilience Fund: Civil Society
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, if he will make and assessment of the adequacy of funding for the voluntary sector through the Crisis Resilience Fund. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) No assessment has been made on the adequacy of funding for the voluntary sector through the Crisis Resilience Fund. The Government is providing £842 million per year (£1 billion including Barnett consequential) to reform crisis support, which represents the first ever multi-year settlement for locally delivered crisis support. Whilst funding will be going directly to local authorities, the voluntary and community sector will play a pivotal role in delivery of the fund |
|
Child Maintenance Service: Standards
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps his Department is taking to help reduce Child Maintenance Service (a) response and (b) decision times. Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions) The Child Maintenance Service (CMS) has made significant strides through its Service Modernisation and Digital Transformation Programmes, improving response times and expanding online services for separated parents. It has optimised digital channels and self-service options, reducing caseworker involvement in many processes and speeding up outcomes for customers. Staff support has also improved through upgraded training and operational guidance. Communication with customers is quicker and clearer thanks to greater use of SMS, email, and simplified letters.
As the demand for the service continues to grow, CMS is actively reviewing resources and recruiting to meet future needs. It regularly gathers feedback through the Customer Experience Survey and uses this insight to identify areas for improvement. Its focus remains on delivering efficient, accessible services while continuing to review, evaluate, and enhance tools, processes, and customer experience as part of the ongoing Service Modernisation Programme. |
|
Tongue-tie: Babies
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Monday 17th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to (a) research the causes of ankyloglossia and (b) improve early diagnosis of that condition. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department funds health and care research through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The NIHR funds clinical, public health, and social care research and works in partnership with the National Health Service, universities, local government, other research funders, patients, and the public. The NIHR welcomes proposals for research into a range of conditions, including ankyloglossia, at the following link:
https://www.nihr.ac.uk/get-involved/suggest-a-research-topic |
|
Medical Treatments
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Thursday 20th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what progress he has made on meeting the 18-week treatment targets in the Elective Reform Plan. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) Tackling waiting lists is a key part of our Health Mission. We have exceeded our pledge to deliver an extra two million operations, scans, and appointments, having delivered 5.2 million additional appointments between July 2024 and June 2025. This marks a vital first step to delivering on the commitment that 92% of patients will wait no longer than 18 weeks from referral to consultant-led treatment, in line with the National Health Service constitutional standard, by March 2029. The Elective Reform Plan, published in January 2025, sets out the productivity and reform efforts needed to return to the constitutional standard. Planning Guidance for 2025/26 sets a target that 65% of patients wait no longer than 18 weeks by March 2026, with every trust expected to deliver a minimum 5% improvement on current performance over that period. Since April, when the Elective Reform Plan came in to effect, the percentage of patient pathways that involved waits of less than 18 weeks for treatment has improved by 2%, rising from 59.8% to 61.8% as of the end of September. This is the best performance since June 2022. The referral-to-treatment waiting list decreased to 7.39 million in September 2025, a reduction of 231,854 since the start of July 2024. But we know there is still much more to do, and we will continue to support NHS trusts to deliver our targets through innovation, sharing best practice to increase productivity and efficiency, and ensuring the best value is delivered. |
|
Joint Replacements: Surgery
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Thursday 20th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he has made an assessment of the potential merits of removing the use of body mass index thresholds to determine eligibility for joint replacement surgery. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department has made no specific assessment of the potential merits of removing the use of body mass index (BMI) thresholds to determine eligibility for joint replacement surgery. It is the responsibility of individual integrated care boards to determine policies for their local area. As with all surgery, BMI would be considered as part of a holistic, personalised perioperative evaluation of the risks versus clinical need for joint replacement surgery of an individual patient. However, BMI should not be considered in isolation and in and of itself should not act as a barrier to surgery. As part of the NHS Elective Reform Plan there is a commitment to expand access to the NHS Digital Weight Management Programme for patients waiting for hip and knee surgery. |
|
Surgery: Waiting Lists
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Wednesday 19th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to help reduce elective care waiting times (a) in general and (b) for joint replacement surgery. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government is committed to putting patients first and tackling waiting lists as part of our Health Mission. We exceeded our pledge to deliver an extra two million appointments, tests, and operations in our first year of Government, delivering 5.2 million additional appointments between July 2024 and June 2025. This marks a vital first step to delivering on our commitment to return to the National Health Service constitutional standard that 92% of patients wait no longer than 18 weeks from referral to consultant-led treatment by March 2029. The Department is taking a range of steps to reduce waiting times for surgery, including joint replacement surgery. There are currently 123 surgical hubs operational across England, and we are committed to expanding the number of hubs over the next three years to increase surgical capacity and deliver faster access to common procedures. Surgical hubs have been shown to deliver approximately 20% increased productivity in the hubs compared to trusts without a dedicated elective hub on site. The Getting it Right First time (GIRFT) programme published detailed guidance for hip and knee replacements in July 2023 and has been supporting trusts through a multidisciplinary team made up of anaesthetic, surgical, and allied health professional colleagues. Additionally, GIRFT is leading a community musculoskeletal programme, supporting improvements in the early stages of the pathway, to ensure that only those patients who require surgery are referred into secondary care, and that their condition is optimised for surgery as far as possible at the point of referral. Further information on the GIRFT programme is available at the following link: |
|
Obesity: Vaccination
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Wednesday 19th November 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to increase access to weight loss injections for long-term conditions. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Weight loss injections are currently recommended for use on the National Health Service for the treatment of obesity and/or type 2 diabetes. To be routinely used in the NHS in England, a medicine normally needs a marketing authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) that shows it is safe and efficacious, and then a positive National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) appraisal to show if it is a clinically and cost-effective use of NHS resources. NICE is currently developing guidance on the use of semaglutide for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and, subject to licensing, liver fibrosis, without cirrhosis, caused by metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. Most recently, NICE recommended semaglutide, brand name Wegovy, and tirzepatide, brand name Mounjaro, as treatments for obesity, in adults with a high body mass index and at least one weight-related comorbidity such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and/or cardiovascular disease. Until recently, these medicines were only available in specialist weight management services. From 23 June tirzepatide started to become available in primary care. This will help to increase access. Access is being prioritised for those with the highest clinical need first. The NHS will look at different service models including digital and community options and the roll out will be sped up if possible. As set out in the Government’s new 10-Year Health Plan, we are committed to expanding access to these medicines and will work closely with industry and local systems to test new models of care and identify innovative ways to do this. |
|
Housing: Construction
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Friday 21st November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment his Department has made of the potential merits of changing planning laws to ensure developments with full planning permission are (a) completed on time and (b) not able to exist with minimal work on them. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Local planning authorities (LPAs) already have a wide range of enforcement powers, with strong penalties for non-compliance, which they can use in instances where development has not taken place in accordance with the relevant planning consent.
These enforcement powers include the power to issue a completion notice which requires a developer to complete their development if it is left uncompleted.
It is for LPAs themselves to decide how and when they use their powers depending on the circumstances of each case.
On 25 May, the government published a Planning Reform Working Paper: Speeding Up Build Out (which can be found on gov.uk here) inviting views on further action the government should take to speed up homes being built.
On the same day, we launched a technical consultation on implementing measures to improve the transparency of build rates from new residential development, which includes proposals to implement provisions in Section 113 of the LURA on the power to decline to determine applications. The consultation can be found on gov.uk here. Subject to the outcome of the consultation, the government intends bring forward the regulations to implement these measures at the earliest practical opportunity with the new build out reporting framework coming into force from 2026.
The consultations closed on 7 July and responses are currently being analysed. |
|
Active Travel: Rural Areas
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Friday 21st November 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the answer of 16 October 2024 to UIN 8287, what the status is of the proposed rural design guide; and when that guide will be completed. Answered by Lilian Greenwood - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury Following consultation with stakeholders, Active Travel England’s Rural Design Guidance is currently in its final development stages and is expected to be published by the end of the year. |
|
Leasehold: Reform
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Friday 21st November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether the forthcoming Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill will include provisions to (a) regulate the use of estate rentcharges on freehold properties, (b) limit enforcement powers available to estate rentcharge holders under Section 121 of the Law of Property Act 1925 and (c) provide homeowners with a statutory right to vary estate rentcharge deeds to remove disproportionate enforcement mechanisms. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The use of Sections 121 and 122 of the Law of Property Act 1925 to enforce rent arrears is draconian and wholly inappropriate given alternative means for rentcharge arrears are available.
We will publish an ambitious draft Leasehold and Commonhold reform Bill before the end of the year. |
|
Freehold: Sales
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Friday 21st November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of Section 121 of the Law of Property Act 1925 powers on freehold homeowners' ability to sell properties subject to estate rent charges; and whether he has plans to restrict or remove such powers in relation to estate rent charges. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The use of Sections 121 and 122 of the Law of Property Act 1925 to enforce rent arrears is draconian and wholly inappropriate given alternative means for rentcharge arrears are available.
We will publish an ambitious draft Leasehold and Commonhold reform Bill before the end of the year. |
|
Active Travel: Public Consultation
Asked by: James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) Friday 21st November 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to Question 8287answered on 16 October 2024, what is the (a) status of the best practice guide to community consultation and engagement and (b) when this guide will be completed. Answered by Lilian Greenwood - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury Following consultation with stakeholders, Active Travel England’s Rural Design Guidance is currently in its final development stages and is expected to be published by the end of the year. |
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
17th November 2025
James Naish (Labour - Rushcliffe) 8. Miscellaneous Bassetlaw District Councillor, (unpaid since July 2024 and previously registered under Category 1) Source |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
12 Nov 2025, 7:19 p.m. - House of Commons "Petition. James Naish. >> Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker, I wish to present this petition on behalf of my constituents in " Points of Order Nigel Huddleston MP (Droitwich and Evesham, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Nov 2025, 7:19 p.m. - House of Commons "No. The ayes have it. The ayes have it. We now come on to petitions. Petition. James Naish. " Points of Order Nigel Huddleston MP (Droitwich and Evesham, Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
12 Nov 2025, 11:58 a.m. - House of Commons "unless she is first focussed on the future, her party will remain stuck in the past. >> James Naish. " Rt Hon Liz Kendall MP, The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology (Leicester West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Nov 2025, 5:19 p.m. - House of Commons ">> James Naish. >> Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. >> There were 868 cases of Flytipping in 20 23. 24, in my " James Naish MP (Rushcliffe, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Nov 2025, 5:19 p.m. - House of Commons "legal powers that we have in this particular case could include an unlimited fine. >> James Naish. " Emma Hardy MP, The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 14th November 2025
Report - Large Print - 8th Report - Empowering Development: Energy Access for Communities International Development Committee Found: ; Melksham and Devizes) David Mundell (Conservative; Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale) James Naish |
|
Friday 14th November 2025
Report - 8th Report - Empowering Development: Energy Access for Communities International Development Committee Found: Democrat; Melksham and Devizes) David Mundell (Conservative; Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale) James Naish |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 25th November 2025 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Future of UK aid and development assistance At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Martin John - National Officer at Public and Commercial Services (PCS) trade union Lois Austin - FCDO Group Secretary at Public and Commercial Services (PCS) trade union At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Professor Emma Mawdsley - Professor of Geography and Development Studies at University of Cambridge Gideon Rabinowitz - Director of Policy and Advocacy at Bond Freddie Carver - Director, Humanitarian Policy Group at ODI Global Ms Anna Schuesterl - Director of Communications at ODI Global View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The UK’s development partnership with Nigeria At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Mary Dinah - CEO and Founder at Mary Dinah Foundation Evelyn Mere - Country Director at WaterAid Nigeria Andrew Mamedu - Country Director at ActionAid Nigeria At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Camilla Higgins - Director at INGO Forum Nigeria Thierno Samba Diallo - Country Director at Action against Hunger Arjun Jain - Representative in Nigeria at UNHCR View calendar - Add to calendar |