Debates between James Duddridge and Taiwo Owatemi during the 2019 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between James Duddridge and Taiwo Owatemi
Tuesday 30th June 2020

(3 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Taiwo Owatemi Portrait Taiwo Owatemi (Coventry North West) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Whether the Government plan to ring-fence the budget for official development assistance in the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.

James Duddridge Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (James Duddridge)
- Hansard - -

We continue to spend 0.7% of our gross national income on aid, and that is enshrined in law. We will continue to be guided by the International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Act 2015, including a commitment to spending on reducing poverty, and we believe we will be stronger in that aim as one Department.

--- Later in debate ---
James Duddridge Portrait James Duddridge
- Hansard - -

We do not need a separate Department to learn lessons from the past, but that type of transaction would be wholly inappropriate and would not happen under this ministerial team.

Taiwo Owatemi Portrait Taiwo Owatemi
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The UK is rightly proud of its commitment to spend 0.7% of GDP on international aid. The decision by the Government to merge these Departments has been met with criticism by some world-leading international development charities. Former Prime Ministers have also criticised the decision, with David Cameron describing it as a “mistake”. Our international aid commitment can and does save lives, so will the Minister confirm that the budget for international aid will be ring-fenced within a future Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office?

James Duddridge Portrait James Duddridge
- Hansard - -

We are bound by law to spend 0.7%, so it is not a choice; it is in the law, and we will obey the law. I was one of David Cameron’s Ministers in the Foreign Office in that period, and I found a lack of joined-up thinking. I worked well with DFID, but I think this will work better as one Department and it has already worked better with a Joint Minister.