All 1 Debates between James Duddridge and Taiwo Owatemi

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between James Duddridge and Taiwo Owatemi
Tuesday 30th June 2020

(4 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Taiwo Owatemi Portrait Taiwo Owatemi (Coventry North West) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Whether the Government plan to ring-fence the budget for official development assistance in the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.

James Duddridge Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (James Duddridge)
- Hansard - -

We continue to spend 0.7% of our gross national income on aid, and that is enshrined in law. We will continue to be guided by the International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Act 2015, including a commitment to spending on reducing poverty, and we believe we will be stronger in that aim as one Department.

--- Later in debate ---
James Duddridge Portrait James Duddridge
- Hansard - -

We do not need a separate Department to learn lessons from the past, but that type of transaction would be wholly inappropriate and would not happen under this ministerial team.

Taiwo Owatemi Portrait Taiwo Owatemi
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The UK is rightly proud of its commitment to spend 0.7% of GDP on international aid. The decision by the Government to merge these Departments has been met with criticism by some world-leading international development charities. Former Prime Ministers have also criticised the decision, with David Cameron describing it as a “mistake”. Our international aid commitment can and does save lives, so will the Minister confirm that the budget for international aid will be ring-fenced within a future Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office?

James Duddridge Portrait James Duddridge
- Hansard - -

We are bound by law to spend 0.7%, so it is not a choice; it is in the law, and we will obey the law. I was one of David Cameron’s Ministers in the Foreign Office in that period, and I found a lack of joined-up thinking. I worked well with DFID, but I think this will work better as one Department and it has already worked better with a Joint Minister.