Debates between James Cartlidge and Natascha Engel during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Business without Debate

Debate between James Cartlidge and Natascha Engel
Friday 24th February 2017

(7 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
James Cartlidge Portrait James Cartlidge (South Suffolk) (Con)
- Hansard - -

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. You may be aware that throughout the IRA’s reign of terror, much of the explosive they used to kill was supplied by Libya. The Bill has the support of victims of IRA terrorism. Are you able to give any advice to those of us who want to put on record the anger of those victims that the Bill has been objected to?

Natascha Engel Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman has very cleverly just done so.

Workers’ Rights (Maintenance of EU Standards) Bill

Motion made, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

Tax Avoidance and Evasion

Debate between James Cartlidge and Natascha Engel
Wednesday 13th April 2016

(8 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
James Cartlidge Portrait James Cartlidge
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is absolutely right to mention small businesses. I used to say to people that I ran a small business, but measured by the amount of corporation tax we paid, we were bigger than Google. The fact is that those who run small businesses feel as though they have to comply. They cannot afford expensive lawyers. I agree with the hon. Member for Newcastle upon Tyne North about the sense that there is an elite who live by different rules. We have to deal with that, but we must not run away from the key point—my concluding point—with which my hon. Friend the Financial Secretary also concluded, namely that when we talk about transparency, the transparency that really matters to the public is about our ideals and our beliefs.

What do we really believe? I fundamentally believe in the free market. I believe in capitalism. I believe in individuals getting out there and using their creativity to earn their way in the world. We cannot go back to paying our way through debt and unsustainable public finances. In the circumstances, we need to maximise the tax that we get, but we also need to maximise the investment into the country from companies that we have heard the Labour Front Benchers criticise. Those big professional firms in London are massive employers in this country. We need to expand our exports from the services sector. Basically, we need a positive, free enterprise agenda with a fair sense that companies and individuals are paying their fair share, which does not denigrate the free market but creates sustainable growth to deliver prosperity for all.

Natascha Engel Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Natascha Engel)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. I have now to announce the result of a deferred Division on the question relating to employment agencies etc. The Ayes were 307 and the Noes were 241, so the Ayes have it.

[The Division list is published at the end of today’s debates.]