Information between 15th September 2025 - 25th September 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context James Cartlidge voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
Written Answers |
---|
Autism: South Suffolk
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the accessibility of autism assessments in South Suffolk. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Government has recognised that, nationally, the demand for assessments for autism has grown significantly in recent years and that people are experiencing severe delays for accessing such assessments. The Government’s 10-Year Health Plan will make the National Health Service fit for the future, including early intervention and support, without the need for diagnosis. It is the responsibility of integrated care boards (ICBs) to make available appropriate provision to meet the health and care needs of their local population, including the provision of autism services, in line with relevant National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. On 5 April 2023, NHS England published a national framework and operational guidance to help ICBs and the NHS to deliver improved outcomes for people referred to an autism assessment service. The guidance also sets out what support should be available before an assessment and following a recent diagnosis of autism. Since publication, NHS England has been supporting systems and services to identify where there are challenges for implementation and how they might overcome these. The Government is also supporting inclusive environments and earlier intervention for children through the Early Language Support for Every Child and the Partnerships for Inclusion of Neurodiversity in Schools programmes. |
Gardens Trust: Planning Permission
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether her Department plans to consider the outcomes of its consultation into the Gardens Trust's statutory consultee role before deciding whether it should be removed as a statutory consultee. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government is committed to reviewing the existing statutory consultee arrangements to ensure they align with the government’s ambitions for growth.
As per the Written Ministerial Statement I made on 10 March 2025 (HCWS510), we intend to consult on removing a limited number of statutory consultees, including the Gardens Trust.
We also intend to review the range and type of planning applications on which statutory consultees are required to be consulted and consider whether some types of application could be removed, or addressed by alternative means of engagement and provision of expert advice.
Further details will be set out in due course. |
Gardens Trust: Planning Permission
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, when she plans to commence the consultation into the proposal to remove the Garden Trusts as a statutory consultee in the planning system. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government is committed to reviewing the existing statutory consultee arrangements to ensure they align with the government’s ambitions for growth.
As per the Written Ministerial Statement I made on 10 March 2025 (HCWS510), we intend to consult on removing a limited number of statutory consultees, including the Gardens Trust.
We also intend to review the range and type of planning applications on which statutory consultees are required to be consulted and consider whether some types of application could be removed, or addressed by alternative means of engagement and provision of expert advice.
Further details will be set out in due course. |
Gardens Trust: Planning Permission
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment she has made of the potential impact that the removal of the Gardens Trust as a statutory consultee in the planning system on (a) local planning authorities, (b) UK tourism, (c) climate change and (d) the sustainability of historic parks and gardens. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government is committed to reviewing the existing statutory consultee arrangements to ensure they align with the government’s ambitions for growth.
As per the Written Ministerial Statement I made on 10 March 2025 (HCWS510), we intend to consult on removing a limited number of statutory consultees, including the Gardens Trust.
We also intend to review the range and type of planning applications on which statutory consultees are required to be consulted and consider whether some types of application could be removed, or addressed by alternative means of engagement and provision of expert advice.
Further details will be set out in due course. |
Recreation Spaces: Planning Permission
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps she is taking to ensure that future planning decisions that impact historic parks and gardens will be informed by expert advice. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government is committed to reviewing the existing statutory consultee arrangements to ensure they align with the government’s ambitions for growth.
As per the Written Ministerial Statement I made on 10 March 2025 (HCWS510), we intend to consult on removing a limited number of statutory consultees, including the Gardens Trust.
We also intend to review the range and type of planning applications on which statutory consultees are required to be consulted and consider whether some types of application could be removed, or addressed by alternative means of engagement and provision of expert advice.
Further details will be set out in due course. |
Defence: Infrastructure
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to recommendation 59 of the Strategic Defence Review, published on 2 June 2025, what plans he has to present the Defence Infrastructure Recapitalisation Plan to Parliament. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) There are currently no plans to present the Defence Infrastructure Recapitalisation Plan to Parliament. |
Defence: Space Technology
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to recommendation 49 of the Strategic Defence Review: Making Britain Safer: secure at home, strong abroad, published on 2 June 2025, how much will his Department invest into the resilience of UK military space systems in each financial year of the current Parliament. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) Work to deliver Strategic Defence Review recommendation 49 will be set out in the Defence Investment Plan due for release in the Autumn. This work is critical to ensuring Defence-wide capability prioritisation is conducted to understand where the greatest requirements rest. Government investment will build on the current UK Space ecosystem to prioritise, cohere and unlock the nation's space potential. Government Departments are working collaboratively to identify space synergies and common priorities to ensure a coherent approach. |
Unmanned Air Systems: Procurement
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 8 July 2025 to Question 64478 on Unmanned Air Systems: Procurement, and with reference to the 50,000 drones to Ukraine announced in his oral statement of 17 July 2025 on Ukraine, col 476, in which circumstances it is his Department's policy to provide information on military drone procurement. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Ministry of Defence (MOD) considers each parliamentary question (PQ) and oral statement on their own merits and responds accordingly.
An important factor in our consideration of PQ responses is the impact of the response on operational security, including the effect of the aggregation of several such answers over a period of time. |
Ministry of Defence: Financial Services
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to recommendation 6 of the Strategic Defence Review, published on 2 June 2025, which team in his Department is responsible for developing a dedicated strategy for the financial services sector by March 2026. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Growth and Missions Directorate within the Department of State will lead the Defence Finance and Investment Strategy in collaboration with Military Strategic Head Quarters and the National Armaments Director Group. They will be supported by the Defence Investors' Advisory Group that will be made of eminent professionals within the banking and venture capital sector. |
Defence: Expenditure and Procurement
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to recommendation 3 of the Strategic Defence Review: Making Britain Safer: secure at home, strong abroad, published on 2 June 2025, what metric was used to measure (a) the lethality of the Armed Forces, (b) productivity (i) within Defence and (ii) of industry and (c) the national economic impact of Defence spending and procurement. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) This Government endorses the Strategic Defence Review’s (SDR) vision and accepts all 62 recommendations. The implementation of the Review’s recommendations will be priority business for the Department and will be executed through a whole of UK Defence effort.
Work is underway across the Department to develop metrics to support the monitoring of delivery. In response to the specific elements of recommendation 3 referenced:
i) Within Defence:
How Defence is driving productivity will be codified in the Defence Reform and Efficiency Plan due to be published alongside the Defence Investment Plan later this year.
Productivity in Defence is measured through efficiency and effectiveness. This includes; cashable savings over the short or medium term and non-financial benefits such as time savings, the ability to redeploy military personnel and enhanced user experience. This aligns to the Office for National Statistics’ (ONS) approach to measuring Public Sector productivity.
Ii) Of Industry
The definition and measurement of productivity is complex but also vitally important. The establishment of effective metrics will help drive the UK’s ability to convert resources—capital, labour, infrastructure, and innovation—into deployable capability at pace and scale. The MOD will actively work with stakeholders across government, industry, and academia to co-design this metric. The KPI is expected to evolve over time as data systems and policy maturity improve.
|
Sustainable Farming Incentive
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps he is taking to support farmers who incurred costs based on an expectation of acceptance to the Sustainable Farming Incentive scheme. Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) 2024 was an uncapped scheme aimed at mass participation of farm businesses, despite a finite farming budget. This large-scale uptake of the scheme meant it reached its upper limit in March 2025.
We have allocated a record £11.8 billion to sustainable farming and food production over this parliament. We are investing more than £2.7 billion a year in farming and nature recovery, the largest budget for sustainable food production in our country’s history to put healthy, nutritious food on our tables. We are working closely with farmers and industry stakeholders to design a future SFI offer that fairly and responsibly directs funding. Further details about the reformed SFI offer will be announced in summer 2025.
That's only part of our commitment to farmers.
We have also protected farmers in trade deals and provided a five-year extension to the Seasonal Worker route, giving farms certainty to grow their businesses.
We are using our own purchasing power to back British produce, with an ambition, where possible, for half of food supplied into the public sector to be produced locally or certified to high environmental standards.
We are reforming the planning system to support clean energy projects that align with our Clean Power 2030 ambitions, helping farm businesses to become more profitable and resilient. |
Sustainable Farming Incentive
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether his Department plans to review the consistency of Sustainable Farming Incentive application decisions made after the scheme was closed. Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) We do not propose to review decisions. We clearly set out the rationale for the reopened Sustainable Farming Incentive scheme. The Rural Payments Agency wrote to all those applicants who were eligible to apply. We worked with stakeholders and partner organisations to ensure transparency of approach and decision making. |
RAF Brize Norton
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Tuesday 16th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to recommendation 48 of the Strategic Defence Review: Making Britain Safer: secure at home, strong abroad, published on 2 June 2025, if he will list the commercial facilities that could be potentially used for operations as a military alternative to RAF Brize Norton. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) I hope the hon. Gentleman will understand that I am withholding the information requested as its disclosure would, or would be likely to prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces. |
Biotechnology
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Friday 19th September 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps he is taking to protect UK sovereign innovation on gene editing in (a) current and (b) future trade deal discussions. Answered by Angela Eagle - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Defra has been clear, including in initial SPS agreement discussions with the EU, on the importance of supporting the use of new and innovative technologies such as precision breeding. Defra remains committed to the Precision Breeding Act 2023, and the secondary legislation needed to implement the Act for plants is due to commence in November 2025. |
Ministry of Defence: Written Questions
Asked by: James Cartlidge (Conservative - South Suffolk) Wednesday 24th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, when he plans to respond to Question 64587 on Defence Growth Board, tabled on 2 July 2025. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) I will respond to the hon. Member shortly. |