All 3 Debates between James Cartlidge and Holly Mumby-Croft

Defence

Debate between James Cartlidge and Holly Mumby-Croft
Monday 27th November 2023

(1 year ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Holly Mumby-Croft Portrait Holly Mumby-Croft (Scunthorpe) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I believe that the ability to make virgin steel is crucial to the UK’s defence capabilities. Does my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State agree?

James Cartlidge Portrait James Cartlidge
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend makes an excellent point. She has been a long-running champion of the steel sector and its importance to her constituents. Of course, we want a smooth transition between blast furnace and electronic arc steel making technology. Steel remains incredibly important to the defence sector. Take the Type 26: almost 50% of that is British steel. That is 1,400 tonnes per ship. That underlines why it is so important that, in constituencies such as my hon. Friend’s, we continue to support the steel sector.

[Official Report, 20 November 2023, Vol. 741, c. 24.]

Letter of correction from the Minister for Defence Procurement, the hon. Member for South Suffolk (James Cartlidge):

An error has been identified in the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Scunthorpe (Holly Mumby-Croft).

The correct answer should have been:

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between James Cartlidge and Holly Mumby-Croft
Monday 20th November 2023

(1 year, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Holly Mumby-Croft Portrait Holly Mumby-Croft (Scunthorpe) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I believe that the ability to make virgin steel is crucial to the UK’s defence capabilities. Does my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State agree?

James Cartlidge Portrait James Cartlidge
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My hon. Friend makes an excellent point. She has been a long-running champion of the steel sector and its importance to her constituents. Of course, we want a smooth transition between blast furnace and electronic arc steel making technology. Steel remains incredibly important to the defence sector. Take the Type 26: almost 50% of that is British steel. That is 1,400 tonnes per ship. That underlines why it is so important that, in constituencies such as my hon. Friend’s, we continue to support the steel sector.

Non-domestic Energy Support

Debate between James Cartlidge and Holly Mumby-Croft
Monday 9th January 2023

(1 year, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
James Cartlidge Portrait James Cartlidge
- View Speech - Hansard - -

That sounds like an interesting idea. I would be more than happy to meet the right hon. Lady.

Holly Mumby-Croft Portrait Holly Mumby-Croft (Scunthorpe) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I welcome the measures announced today, particularly those relating to energy-intensive industries, and the duration of those measures. I will look very carefully at what has been announced.

The Minister will know that thousands of world-class steelmakers in Scunthorpe are listening carefully to what is being announced. May I press him to look at the evidence over the next 12 months so we can reassure ourselves that our support is in line with that in other countries, and so we know we are providing a level playing field for the domestic steel industry in this country? That is all it asks.

James Cartlidge Portrait James Cartlidge
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My hon. Friend, like her constituency neighbour sitting next to her—my hon. Friend the Member for Brigg and Goole (Andrew Percy)—is a champion for the steel sector. She makes a very good point. I understand the huge importance of the industry to her constituency and hope that it will welcome today’s announcement on the energy and trade-intensive industry support and the additional discounts that will be provided. I should stress that as well as having a more generous discount, the scheme will apply at a lower threshold; that is important.

My hon. Friend makes a really important point about duration. The current £18 billion scheme is for six months; the industry said that it wanted 12 months, and we have delivered that. We absolutely want to look at what more we can do to be internationally competitive.