Universal Credit Work Allowance Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Work and Pensions

Universal Credit Work Allowance

James Cartlidge Excerpts
Wednesday 6th January 2016

(8 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Owen Smith Portrait Owen Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think that, more than that, they will be absolutely cheesed off to the back teeth that this Government have tried to pull the wool over their eyes, because the truth is these are precisely the same cuts that were proposed through tax credits—almost exactly the same amount of money will be saved through these cuts to the work allowances as was previously proposed.

Owen Smith Portrait Owen Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

A Member says “Excellent” from a sedentary position. I think—

--- Later in debate ---
James Cartlidge Portrait James Cartlidge
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Owen Smith Portrait Owen Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will be delighted to give way.

James Cartlidge Portrait James Cartlidge
- Hansard - -

I have just a minor detail: every penny paid out in benefits has to be raised in tax out of working people’s taxes. The money paid out in tax credits is not wages; it is means-tested benefits. Does the hon. Gentleman not recognise that the great advantage of UC is that it reduces the harsh impact of means-tested withdrawal of income?

Owen Smith Portrait Owen Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Where do I start? I start by telling the hon. Gentleman that 7,000 of his constituents will be hit by this by the time he next stands before them at the election, and he ought to reflect on that. More importantly, I tell him that it is precisely people in work paying tax—working hard, long hours, many on the minimum wage, working every hour they get—who are getting hit by his Government. That is what these cuts are doing. This is not a different set of people—they are not the scroungers that the Government like to talk about; they are the strivers, and they are being hit by the Government. The truth, as the Institute for Fiscal Studies has said, is that there is no difference between these cuts and the ones to tax credits that the Government proposed, on which they U-turned. According to the IFS, the U-turn makes “no difference”. The Government will end up saving the same £5 billion, at the end of the Parliament as opposed to the beginning, and they will strip £10 billion out of the pockets of working families. They should be ashamed of themselves.