Treasury Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury

Treasury

Ian Mearns Excerpts
Monday 17th July 2023

(1 year, 3 months ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
The following is an extract from the oral statement on public sector pay on 13 July 2023.
Ian Mearns Portrait Ian Mearns (Gateshead) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I am a little concerned about the £1.425 billion to be found from within the Department for Education’s existing budget between now and 2025, with £525 million this financial year and a further £900 million in the next financial year. Will the Minister be a bit more specific about exactly where that will be taken from within the Department’s budget to meet the teachers’ pay increase? While of course we welcome the fact that the Government are honouring the teachers’ pay review body recommendations, let us not forget that the envelope for the review bodies is set by the Government in the first place. There is something else going on in this situation: we currently have a recruitment and retention crisis among our teaching workforce, with something like 20% of newly qualified teachers leaving after three years and 40% leaving after five years. Nobody goes into teaching because of the money, but it always helps, and a rise in line with inflation would certainly help.

John Glen Portrait John Glen
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his question. I think he welcomes what we have decided to do with the 6.5% pay increase, which leaves a typical teacher with £44,300. We are reprioritising within the Department for Education’s existing budget to deliver the additional funding to schools, but we are protecting core schools funding and frontline services. We have put in additional sums of money through the spending review and subsequent fiscal events: £330 million in 2023-24 and £550 million in 2024-25. The numbers add up, and he will recognise that.

[Official Report, 13 July 2023, Vol. 736, c. 533.]

Letter of correction from the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, the right hon. Member for Salisbury (John Glen).

An error has been identified in my response to the hon. Member for Gateshead (Ian Mearns).

The correct response should have been: