Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Oral Answers to Questions

Ian Lavery Excerpts
Thursday 11th February 2016

(8 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Andrea Leadsom Portrait Andrea Leadsom
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful to the hon. Lady for giving me a chance to explain that the licence is not a licence to frack—that sounds a bit Bond-like; it is simply a licence to be able to consider the seismic opportunity of the shale gas that is potentially underneath. It is absolutely not a guarantee that anything will happen at all. There is then a whole planning process to go through, including environmental assessments, health and safety assessments and so on. And there is a very clear local planning process, which is very well communicated and with which she will be very familiar.

Ian Lavery Portrait Ian Lavery (Wansbeck) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

This morning, energy experts reported that we were way behind on the target emission levels set at the Paris COP and in the fourth carbon budget. This comes only weeks after the important agreement in Paris. How on earth can this be the case?

Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman might be aware that the Paris agreement called for temperature increases to be limited to a maximum of 2°, yet the intended nationally determined contributions—the voluntary contributions from each country—only reached 2.7°, so that comes as no surprise. Everyone who signed up to the agreement—let us celebrate the fact that nearly 200 countries did so—knows that there is more work to do. It is not the end of the journey; it is just the start.