Information between 7th April 2026 - 17th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 144 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 136 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 247 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 241 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 245 Labour Aye votes vs 4 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 139 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 12 Labour No votes vs 237 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 263 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 95 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 267 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 159 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 269 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 159 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 261 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 162 |
|
14 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 176 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 12 Labour No votes vs 237 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 155 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 241 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 103 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Ian Lavery voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Ian Lavery speeches from: Single Status of Worker
Ian Lavery contributed 3 speeches (1,147 words) Wednesday 15th April 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Business and Trade |
|
Ian Lavery speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Ian Lavery contributed 1 speech (52 words) Tuesday 14th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Local Government: Finance
Asked by: Ian Lavery (Labour - Blyth and Ashington) Wednesday 8th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if he will set out what support his Department and Cabinet colleagues makes available to local authorities to develop community energy schemes, local food production and emergency preparedness plans. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) In the recently published Local Power Plan, Government recognises that limited capacity and capability are major barriers for local government to participate in small-scale energy projects. Backed by up to £1 billion and working in partnership with local government, Great British Energy (GBE) has committed to support at least 1000 local and community energy projects by 2030.
The Good Food Cycle recognises the key role that regional and local food systems can play in supporting delivery of the growth, health, sustainability, and food security/ resilience outcomes of the Good Food Cycle. We know the best solutions often come from the ground up. That is why the Good Food Cycle sets the ambition to use local community initiatives to harness a stronger food culture to support our health, sustainability and resilience outcomes.
Improving the food environment will support healthier and more environmentally sustainable food sales, and access to all for safe, affordable, healthy, convenient, and appealing food options. Defra is developing a programme of work to support local, hyper-local and community-based interventions around access to healthy and affordable food in priority locations.
MHCLG and CO run a local capabilities assessment programme which assesses emergency preparedness planning for specific response capabilities across the 38 Local Resilience Forums (LRFs). This work helps inform national government on local preparedness gaps and identify actionable areas for improvement.
The Civil Contingencies Act (2004) places a duty on all local authorities to cooperate with other agencies (e.g. police, fire & rescue, health), operating as a Local Resilience Forum, to prepare and maintain plans for the key risks facing their area. In addition, local authorities are expected to have business continuity plans that will assist them to continue to operate when emergencies impact them directly. |
|
Revenue and Customs: Managed Service Companies
Asked by: Ian Lavery (Labour - Blyth and Ashington) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether HMRC has assessed the potential impact of differing terms, conditions, training, and turnover rates on service quality and resilience in relation to the use of Managed Service Providers. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The current staff provided by Managed Service Providers (MSPs) represent additional capacity in 2025/26. HMRC staff will not be made redundant as a result of this initiative.
Other Government Departments (OGDs) already use MSP contracts to provide additional workforce flexibility. HMRC are currently in an initial approximately 18 month ‘proof of value’ phase using existing Government contracts. This will allow them to test, learn and ensure quality and value for money before wider implementation.
HMRC provides the initial training for the services covered by the MSPs, before approving suppliers to train subsequent cohorts of staff themselves. All operational guidance is developed, owned and updated by HMRC, and HMRC retains full decision‑making authority, with a dedicated team actively managing the partnership.
Callers are not informed whether the person they are speaking to is employed by HMRC or an MSP, as the service which they receive is the same. OGDs also take this approach. |
|
Revenue and Customs: Managed Service Companies
Asked by: Ian Lavery (Labour - Blyth and Ashington) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how HMRC will ensure parity in standards of advice, security compliance, and customer outcomes between those employed by the Managed Service Provider and those employed directly by HMRC. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The current staff provided by Managed Service Providers (MSPs) represent additional capacity in 2025/26. HMRC staff will not be made redundant as a result of this initiative.
Other Government Departments (OGDs) already use MSP contracts to provide additional workforce flexibility. HMRC are currently in an initial approximately 18 month ‘proof of value’ phase using existing Government contracts. This will allow them to test, learn and ensure quality and value for money before wider implementation.
HMRC provides the initial training for the services covered by the MSPs, before approving suppliers to train subsequent cohorts of staff themselves. All operational guidance is developed, owned and updated by HMRC, and HMRC retains full decision‑making authority, with a dedicated team actively managing the partnership.
Callers are not informed whether the person they are speaking to is employed by HMRC or an MSP, as the service which they receive is the same. OGDs also take this approach. |
|
Revenue and Customs: Managed Service Companies
Asked by: Ian Lavery (Labour - Blyth and Ashington) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what safeguards are in place to prevent the creation of a two tier workforce between Managed Service Provider staff and those directly employed by HMRC, and if she will make a statement. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The current staff provided by Managed Service Providers (MSPs) represent additional capacity in 2025/26. HMRC staff will not be made redundant as a result of this initiative.
Other Government Departments (OGDs) already use MSP contracts to provide additional workforce flexibility. HMRC are currently in an initial approximately 18 month ‘proof of value’ phase using existing Government contracts. This will allow them to test, learn and ensure quality and value for money before wider implementation.
HMRC provides the initial training for the services covered by the MSPs, before approving suppliers to train subsequent cohorts of staff themselves. All operational guidance is developed, owned and updated by HMRC, and HMRC retains full decision‑making authority, with a dedicated team actively managing the partnership.
Callers are not informed whether the person they are speaking to is employed by HMRC or an MSP, as the service which they receive is the same. OGDs also take this approach. |
|
Civil Servants
Asked by: Ian Lavery (Labour - Blyth and Ashington) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if she will give assurance that Managed Service Provider expansion will not result in a reduction in permanent civil service posts over the medium term, and if she will make a statement. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The current staff provided by Managed Service Providers (MSPs) represent additional capacity in 2025/26. HMRC staff will not be made redundant as a result of this initiative.
Other Government Departments (OGDs) already use MSP contracts to provide additional workforce flexibility. HMRC are currently in an initial approximately 18 month ‘proof of value’ phase using existing Government contracts. This will allow them to test, learn and ensure quality and value for money before wider implementation.
HMRC provides the initial training for the services covered by the MSPs, before approving suppliers to train subsequent cohorts of staff themselves. All operational guidance is developed, owned and updated by HMRC, and HMRC retains full decision‑making authority, with a dedicated team actively managing the partnership.
Callers are not informed whether the person they are speaking to is employed by HMRC or an MSP, as the service which they receive is the same. OGDs also take this approach. |
|
Revenue and Customs: Managed Service Companies
Asked by: Ian Lavery (Labour - Blyth and Ashington) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether callers to HMRC are advised whether the person they are speaking to is employed by HMRC or a Managed Service Provider. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The current staff provided by Managed Service Providers (MSPs) represent additional capacity in 2025/26. HMRC staff will not be made redundant as a result of this initiative.
Other Government Departments (OGDs) already use MSP contracts to provide additional workforce flexibility. HMRC are currently in an initial approximately 18 month ‘proof of value’ phase using existing Government contracts. This will allow them to test, learn and ensure quality and value for money before wider implementation.
HMRC provides the initial training for the services covered by the MSPs, before approving suppliers to train subsequent cohorts of staff themselves. All operational guidance is developed, owned and updated by HMRC, and HMRC retains full decision‑making authority, with a dedicated team actively managing the partnership.
Callers are not informed whether the person they are speaking to is employed by HMRC or an MSP, as the service which they receive is the same. OGDs also take this approach. |
|
Infected Blood Inquiry
Asked by: Ian Lavery (Labour - Blyth and Ashington) Tuesday 14th April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he has taken with Cabinet colleagues to implement recommendation nine of the Infected Blood Inquiry's report. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) It is crucial we protect the safety of haemophilia care and the Government is committed to implementing recommendation 9 of the 2024 Infected Blood Inquiry report. The Government is committed to improving the lives of those living with rare diseases, such as haemophilia. The UK Rare Diseases Framework sets out four priorities collaboratively developed with the rare disease community: these include getting a final diagnosis faster; increasing awareness of rare diseases among healthcare professionals; better coordination of care; and improving access to specialist care, treatments, and drugs. We published the fifth annual England action plan in February 2026, where we report on the steps we have taken to advance these priorities. This includes peer review of UK comprehensive care centres, which has been an essential part of haemophilia services for many years. The triennial audit was replaced in 2019 with a more formal peer review process on a five-year cycle. The final peer review report is expected to be published imminently and once published, will be shared with the NHSE Specialised Commissioning Quality Oversight Group for consideration and action. This will be supported by a letter to Integrated Care Boards and Trust Boards, emphasising the valuable role of peer review and ask for confirmation of their commitment to review and implement the peer review findings. The Haemophilia Service Specification has been updated by the Blood Disorders Clinical Reference Group and is making its way through final approvals, having undergone public consultation. The new specification includes a contractual requirement for providers to participate in, and act upon peer review findings. |
|
Climate Change and Energy Supply: National Security
Asked by: Ian Lavery (Labour - Blyth and Ashington) Thursday 16th April 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of climate‑driven global crop failures, droughts and energy system strain on UK national security. Answered by Mary Creagh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) On 20 January, the Government published the Nature Security Assessment, which found that severe degradation or collapse of critical global ecosystems would be highly likely to result in impacts such as water insecurity and reduced crop yields. These findings inform cross-government resilience and national security planning, helping the UK anticipate and manage systemic risks arising from climate and nature loss. The UK Food Security Report 2024 similarly sets out that, while UK production and trade remain stable, climate change, nature loss and water pressures pose increasing risks to long-term food system resilience. These assessments sit alongside the Government’s five-yearly Climate Change Risk Assessment, most recently published in 2022, which considered risks to both the food and energy sectors. Maintaining secure and resilient food and energy systems is a core Government priority, supported by the UK National Adaptation Programme, which provides the framework for identifying and addressing climate change impacts across critical sectors. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Tuesday 28th April Ian Lavery signed this EDM on Tuesday 28th April 2026 International Workers’ Memorial Day 2026 29 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Mary Kelly Foy (Labour - City of Durham) That this House marks International Workers’ Memorial Day 2026; remembers all those who have been killed, injured or made ill as a result of their work; sends solidarity to bereaved families, injured workers and all those living with work-related illness; recognises the vital role of trade unions, health and safety … |
|
Tuesday 21st April Ian Lavery signed this EDM on Thursday 23rd April 2026 Planned reductions to BBC staff 26 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford) That this House expresses concerns at the BBC’s plans to cut between 1,800 and 2,000 jobs, about one in 10, across various departments; notes that BBC management has also outlined spending reductions, including on travel, attending external events, and commissioning freelances, in addition to cutting posts; further notes the latest … |
|
Monday 20th April Ian Lavery signed this EDM on Thursday 23rd April 2026 26 signatures (Most recent: 27 Apr 2026) Tabled by: Chris Hinchliff (Labour - North East Hertfordshire) That this House calls on the Government to adopt and implement the UK Curlew Action Plan; recognises that the Eurasian Curlew, one of Britain’s most iconic and culturally significant birds, has declined by approximately 65 per cent since the 1970s and is now classified as a Red Listed species; notes … |
|
Monday 20th April Ian Lavery signed this EDM on Thursday 23rd April 2026 Use of restraint of children in the asylum system removal process 26 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Rachael Maskell (Labour (Co-op) - York Central) That this House notes that Government are consulting on the use of physical restraint techniques to be applied to children during the removal process in the asylum system, including the handcuffing, carrying and physically handling of a child, which is well recognised as inducing psychological trauma to a child; therefore … |
|
Thursday 16th April Ian Lavery signed this EDM on Thursday 23rd April 2026 Impact of war in the Middle East on the cost of living 21 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Jon Trickett (Labour - Normanton and Hemsworth) That this House expresses deep concern at the escalating cost of living crisis affecting households across the United Kingdom; notes that the war in the Middle East has severely disrupted vital supply chains including shipping, energy, critical minerals and metals, food and fertiliser, semi-conductors and many more, which has caused … |
|
Thursday 16th April Ian Lavery signed this EDM on Thursday 23rd April 2026 Israel’s treatment of Palestinian prisoners 44 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Andy McDonald (Labour - Middlesbrough and Thornaby East) That this House expresses grave concern about reports of widespread and systematic torture of Palestinians detained and imprisoned by Israel, including children; notes with alarm that, since 2023, the situation has deteriorated significantly, with evidence of intensifying abuses, including beatings, sexual violence, starvation and lethal mistreatment, leading to unprecedented numbers … |
|
Wednesday 15th April Ian Lavery signed this EDM on Thursday 23rd April 2026 16 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026) Tabled by: Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour - Clapham and Brixton Hill) That this House regrets the Government’s decision to abstain on the recent United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/80/L.48 rather than vote for it; recognises the immense harm and suffering caused by the transatlantic slave trade, and the legacy of harm left by the practice, as well as colonialism and neocolonialism; … |
|
Monday 13th April Ian Lavery signed this EDM on Thursday 23rd April 2026 9 signatures (Most recent: 23 Apr 2026) Tabled by: Jon Trickett (Labour - Normanton and Hemsworth) That this House welcomes the Government’s Waste Crime Action Plan and the decision to provide the Environment Agency (EA) with enhanced funding, strengthened enforcement mechanisms, and the capacity to intervene more decisively; notes that more clarity is required regarding the EA’s expanded enforcement budget and wider use of restriction orders … |
|
Monday 13th April Ian Lavery signed this EDM on Thursday 23rd April 2026 Universal Credit health for under-22s 27 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Neil Duncan-Jordan (Labour - Poole) That this House expresses grave concern at the proposal to delay access to the Universal Credit health element for young disabled people under 22; notes the absence of evidence that reducing benefit income or tightening eligibility increases participation in employment, education or training; recognises evidence, including the Department for Work … |
|
Wednesday 25th March Ian Lavery signed this EDM on Thursday 23rd April 2026 26 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026) Tabled by: David Baines (Labour - St Helens North) That this House commemorates Workers Memorial Day and pays tribute to all workers who have lost their lives, suffered injury or experienced illness as a result of their work; calls on employers, employees, and trade unions across the UK to mark this occasion by renewing their commitment to workplace safety; … |
|
Tuesday 14th April Ian Lavery signed this EDM as a sponsor on Thursday 16th April 2026 37 signatures (Most recent: 29 Apr 2026) Tabled by: John McDonnell (Labour - Hayes and Harlington) That an humble Address be presented to His Majesty, praying that the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Amendment) Regulations 2026 (SI, 2026, No. 202), dated 2 March 2026, a copy of which was laid before this House on 3 March 2026, be annulled. |
|
Monday 13th April Ian Lavery signed this EDM on Tuesday 14th April 2026 Palestinian Nakba commemoration march 39 signatures (Most recent: 28 Apr 2026)Tabled by: John McDonnell (Labour - Hayes and Harlington) That this House notes that every year the Palestine Coalition organises a march in London on the anniversary of the Nakba and that this year the march falls on Saturday 16 May; expresses its strong concern that the Metropolitan Police has refused the Palestine movement its preferred route for the … |