Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Work and Pensions

Oral Answers to Questions

Ian Lavery Excerpts
Monday 13th June 2011

(12 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Iain Duncan Smith Portrait Mr Duncan Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will get a grip the moment the right hon. Gentleman’s team decide whether they are in favour of the Bill or against it. I gather that the Leader of the Opposition has today moved like a wriggly worm and decided that he is both for and against it, which is really not surprising. The point of bringing forward our proposals is that the right hon. Gentleman and everybody else will have a chance to look at them and decide whether they agree with them. After the consultation, we will make it clear what our final proposals are. I think that that is fair. Last time, he complained that we did not consult him—he ought to make his mind up.

Ian Lavery Portrait Ian Lavery (Wansbeck) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

4. What estimate the Health and Safety Executive has made of the annual cost to the economy of inadequate workplace health and safety.

Chris Grayling Portrait The Minister of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Chris Grayling)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Health and Safety Executive estimates that the annual cost to Great Britain of workplace injuries and work-related ill health is currently in the order of £20 billion.

Ian Lavery Portrait Ian Lavery
- Hansard - -

Last year, there were 152 fatalities and 26,000 major injuries in the workplace and more than 800,000 people suffered a work-related illness. As a consequence of the cuts, the HSE has withdrawn a large number of workplace inspections. How will the Government ensure that those figures do not increase year on year?

Chris Grayling Portrait Chris Grayling
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As a former union official, the hon. Gentleman will know that the biggest challenge we face is employers who cut corners and break the rules. I would have thought that he would welcome a change in policy that focuses health and safety inspections not on low-risk, good employer sites, which have taken up so much resource in the past, but on employers who are not playing by the book and who endanger their employees and the public. That is where I want our regulatory effort to focus.