Courts Service Estate Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice

Courts Service Estate

Guy Opperman Excerpts
Tuesday 14th December 2010

(13 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jonathan Djanogly Portrait Mr Djanogly
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend made a very cogent case for the retention of his court, and put the local case very strongly. I have to say that the judgment was finely balanced, but ultimately this decision was taken because the utilisation rate in the Surrey courts has been below 80%, and transferring work to Staines and Guildford magistrates courts will result in the rate increasing to 89%.

Guy Opperman Portrait Guy Opperman (Hexham) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I disclose my former profession as a barrister. Tynedale in Northumberland has almost 1,000 square miles without a court. The consultation used poor-quality figures and they were badly applied. If they are wrong, does the Minister accept that the claim is capable of judicial review?

Jonathan Djanogly Portrait Mr Djanogly
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We do not believe that the figures we consulted on were wrong.