Debates between Greg Smith and Victoria Collins during the 2024 Parliament

Fri 24th Jan 2025
Climate and Nature Bill
Commons Chamber

2nd reading (continuation of debate)

Climate and Nature Bill

Debate between Greg Smith and Victoria Collins
2nd reading
Friday 24th January 2025

(6 days, 5 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Climate and Nature Bill 2024-26 View all Climate and Nature Bill 2024-26 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Greg Smith Portrait Greg Smith
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his intervention. On his first point, all I will say is: not in Mid Buckinghamshire. They tried, but they got 25% of the vote.

To answer the hon. Gentleman’s serious point, I do not see anything in the Bill that challenges the zero emission vehicle mandate. The ZEV mandate is obsessed with testing at tailpipe rather than whole-system analysis, which gets in the way of developing synthetic fuels and greenlighting the great innovators in this country and worldwide to get on with developing that technology. If we put a synthetic fuel through an internal combustion engine, there is still carbon at tailpipe, but it is the same volume of carbon that will be recaptured through atmospheric carbon capture to make the next lot of fuel. It is carbon neutral. It is one volume of carbon in a perpetual circle, yet I see nothing in the Bill that will enable those great innovators to move ahead and get—as some of them claim they can—cost parity with the fossil fuel equivalent within a decade.

Victoria Collins Portrait Victoria Collins (Harpenden and Berkhamsted) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I would like to challenge the hon. Member. This Bill sets a very clear direction for what this country wants to achieve, and that will help innovators and businesses to know where to go, which they were not sure about under the last Government. I would like him to think about that.

Greg Smith Portrait Greg Smith
- Hansard - -

I hear the point the hon. Lady makes, but I fundamentally disagree. We already have the direction—it was the last Conservative Government who were the first in the western world to legislate for net zero by 2050 and who passed the Environment Act. The answers to the challenges we face in the development of synthetics do not sit in the Bill before us today. They sit in other legislation, which I admit I voted against in the last Parliament, but it is the ZEV mandate that gets in the way, because it fails to look at whole-system analysis. Who else wants to have a go?