Canterbury City Council Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Graham P Jones

Main Page: Graham P Jones (Labour - Hyndburn)

Canterbury City Council Bill

Graham P Jones Excerpts
Wednesday 6th February 2013

(11 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
When people decide whether this is a good amendment to support, the first question they will consider is whether they support touting. I hope I have been able to make the case that ticket touting is, as far as I am concerned, a perfectly legitimate part of the free market and people’s freedoms. People should not be prohibited from touting per se. As the Office of Fair Trading found, touting acts largely in the interests of consumers, and if somebody asks a price way in excess of the face value, people do not have to pay that price if they do not want to. Nobody is forcing them to; it is their free choice. I hope that people will not object to this amendment on the basis of principle, because I hope people will think that touting is a principle worth supporting.
Graham P Jones Portrait Graham Jones (Hyndburn) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The hon. Gentleman makes the point that with ticket touting it is acceptable to charge an added value or premium, but that income and revenue belongs to the artist, performer or whomever the person buying the tickets has paid to see. Does he not agree that that is denying them an income?