Graeme Downie Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Graeme Downie

Information between 19th January 2025 - 8th February 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
21 Jan 2025 - Environmental Protection - View Vote Context
Graeme Downie voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 330 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 352 Noes - 75
21 Jan 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context
Graeme Downie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 331 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 349
21 Jan 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context
Graeme Downie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 327 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 338
21 Jan 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context
Graeme Downie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 331 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 338
28 Jan 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Graeme Downie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 325
28 Jan 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Graeme Downie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 312 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 322
28 Jan 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Graeme Downie voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 312 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 321
29 Jan 2025 - Draft Gambling Act 2005 (Operating Licence Conditions) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 Draft Gambling Levy Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context
Graeme Downie voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 11 Noes - 4
3 Feb 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context
Graeme Downie voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 338 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 343 Noes - 87


Speeches
Graeme Downie speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Graeme Downie contributed 1 speech (53 words)
Monday 3rd February 2025 - Commons Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions
Graeme Downie speeches from: Attorney General’s Office: Conflicts of Interest
Graeme Downie contributed 1 speech (126 words)
Thursday 23rd January 2025 - Commons Chamber
Attorney General
Graeme Downie speeches from: Business of the House
Graeme Downie contributed 1 speech (119 words)
Thursday 23rd January 2025 - Commons Chamber
Leader of the House
Graeme Downie speeches from: Russian Maritime Activity and UK Response
Graeme Downie contributed 1 speech (112 words)
Wednesday 22nd January 2025 - Commons Chamber
Ministry of Defence
Graeme Downie speeches from: Armed Forces Commissioner Bill
Graeme Downie contributed 6 speeches (1,271 words)
Report stage
Tuesday 21st January 2025 - Commons Chamber
Ministry of Defence
Graeme Downie speeches from: UK-Ukraine 100-year Partnership
Graeme Downie contributed 1 speech (54 words)
Monday 20th January 2025 - Commons Chamber
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Graeme Downie speeches from: Global Combat Air Programme
Graeme Downie contributed 1 speech (67 words)
Monday 20th January 2025 - Commons Chamber


Written Answers
Cars: Manufacturing Industries
Asked by: Graeme Downie (Labour - Dunfermline and Dollar)
Wednesday 22nd January 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what requirements to differentiate between male and female physiology car manufacturers must fulfil in safety testing.

Answered by Lilian Greenwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

For the majority of vehicle safety testing, it is not necessary to differentiate between male and female physiology to deliver the desired outcome. For example, where a force is required on a brake control or to release a seat belt buckle, that force will be set well within the physical capabilities of most males and females.

However, there are some contexts in which differing injury thresholds between the sexes is important. For this reason, the latest international vehicle regulation covering frontal impact protection uses crash test dummies representative of both male and female occupants. The Government is currently considering mandating this regulation as part of an extensive package of vehicle safety measures.

Drugs: Gender
Asked by: Graeme Downie (Labour - Dunfermline and Dollar)
Friday 24th January 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what testing requirements are in place in the approval process to identify the different impacts of medicines on men and women.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

As part of the approval process for new drugs, the impact of sex, on men versus women, is assessed on pharmacokinetics, or exposure, pharmacodynamics, and overall efficacy and safety. The data is assessed in terms of whether any dose adjustments are warranted. Data in pregnant and breast-feeding women is also required where relevant.

Drugs: Women
Asked by: Graeme Downie (Labour - Dunfermline and Dollar)
Friday 24th January 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many medicinal approvals used female physiology as a baseline for testing in each of the last five years.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency does not capture this information in a searchable format, however this information would be available in Public Assessment Reports and summaries of product characteristics, where relevant. These documents are available at the following link:

https://products.mhra.gov.uk/

Drugs: Gender
Asked by: Graeme Downie (Labour - Dunfermline and Dollar)
Monday 27th January 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of differences in approved medicines on (a) men and (b) women.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency is responsible for approving medicines in the United Kingdom before they are made available to the wider public. This involves a rigorous assessment using data from clinical trials to assess safety and efficacy.

If data suggests that a medicine may have a different effect on men and women, this is considered within the assessment process. Every medicine is assessed on a case-by-case basis, as several factors may impact the performance of a specific product.

Post authorisation, where there is identified or potential differences between men and women in safety or effectiveness, this can be monitored in the risk management plan. The agency keeps the safety and effectiveness of all medicines under continual monitoring in all populations. Should any differences in outcomes between men and women be identified, the agency will take appropriate regulatory action.

Motor Vehicles: Lighting
Asked by: Graeme Downie (Labour - Dunfermline and Dollar)
Tuesday 28th January 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 8 January 2024 to Question 21874 on Motor Vehicles: Lighting, when the independent research started; which organisation is undertaking the work; and if she will publish the terms of reference for the research.

Answered by Lilian Greenwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The research started in October last year and is being carried out by the Transport Research Laboratory (TRL). There are no plans to publish the Terms of Reference for the research, but further details can be found on the TRL website.

https://www.trl.co.uk/news/trl-works-with-dft-to-understand-more-about-the-causes-of-glare

Endometriosis: Research
Asked by: Graeme Downie (Labour - Dunfermline and Dollar)
Monday 3rd February 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how much funding the Government has provided for endometriosis research in each of the last five years; and what proportion of Government-funded medicinal research that accounts for.

Answered by Andrew Gwynne

The Department funds research through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The following table shows how much funding the NIHR has awarded for endometriosis research, as well as that spend as a percentage of total urogynaecology research spend, for each year from 2019/20 to 2023/24:

Financial year

Spend

Proportion of total urogynaecology spend

2019/20

£493,945

8.9%

2020/21

£554,151

10.5%

2021/22

£973,089

16.8%

2022/23

£1,360,614

24.9%

2023/24

£1,325,329

21.9%

This information reflects in-year payments to 10 research awards that were active during this time period. It does not reflect the total award value. The total award value for these awards, across their full duration, is £7,714,953.

In addition, between 2019/20 and 2023/24, there were 18 awards with relevance to endometriosis active on UK Research and Innovation’s (UKRI) portfolio. These awards had a total value of £8.43 million. The following table shows the in-year expenditure for this research, for each year from 2019/20 to 2023/24:

Financial year

In year spend

Percentage of spend versus UKRI research base outturn

2019/20

£585,662

<1%

2020/21

£683,812

<1%

2021/22

£1,017,417

<1%

2022/23

£1,264,127

<1%

2023/24

£1,589,230

<1%

The remaining spend is slated for future financial years.

Heart Diseases: Gender
Asked by: Graeme Downie (Labour - Dunfermline and Dollar)
Wednesday 29th January 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what training is provided to NHS staff to highlight the differences in symptoms of a heart attack between men and women.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Guidance for National Health Service staff is available through the British Heart Foundation, and specific learning sessions are available to support training, with further information on both available, respectively, at the following two links:

https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/conditions/heart-attack/signs-and-symptoms-of-heart-attacks-in-women

https://www.chsselearning.org.uk/hearte/15-womens-health/

NHS England has been cognisant of gender differences when running public campaigns, and as such has ensured clear messaging on atypical symptoms in women. This has been represented through sharing patient stories within campaign material, highlighting the differences in gender symptoms. Further information on NHS England’s public campaign is available at the following link:

https://www.england.nhs.uk/2023/08/nhs-launches-lifesaving-campaign-to-help-people-spot-a-heart-attack/

Strategic Defence Review
Asked by: Graeme Downie (Labour - Dunfermline and Dollar)
Friday 31st January 2025

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether his Department provided evidence to the Strategic Defence Review.

Answered by Gareth Thomas - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade)

On 30 July 2024, the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) was invited, alongside other Government Departments, to provide written evidence to the Strategic Defence Review (SDR).

DBT responded to that call for evidence on 23 September 2024. The findings of the SDR are due to be published in 2025.

Department for Work and Pensions: Carers
Asked by: Graeme Downie (Labour - Dunfermline and Dollar)
Tuesday 4th February 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what support her Department provides to its employees that are kinship carers.

Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions)

The potential support the Department for Work and Pensions provides to its employees that are kinship carers are, according to each person’s needs, a combination of flexi hours, flexible working patterns, special leave, adjusted duties and a carers’ passport to ensure that effective support can be transported when employees change jobs within DWP. Our employee assistance programme also offers wider support, which includes employee counselling, critical incident and bereavement support and legal/finance advice and signposting.

Department for Work and Pensions: Carers
Asked by: Graeme Downie (Labour - Dunfermline and Dollar)
Tuesday 4th February 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, when her Department last reviewed its policy on supporting its employees that are kinship carers.

Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions)

DWP reviews the support it gives to carers in its workforce, including kinship carers, on an ongoing basis across a range of relevant HR policies. DWP last reviewed its policy on supporting its employees that are kinship carers, specifically in respect of time off work, in March 2024.




Graeme Downie mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Storm Éowyn
40 speeches (6,480 words)
Monday 27th January 2025 - Commons Chamber
Cabinet Office
Mentions:
1: Melanie Ward (Lab - Cowdenbeath and Kirkcaldy) Friend the Member for Dunfermline and Dollar (Graeme Downie), who has a family emergency today but with - Link to Speech

Armed Forces Commissioner Bill
94 speeches (19,815 words)
Report stage
Tuesday 21st January 2025 - Commons Chamber
Ministry of Defence
Mentions:
1: Jacob Collier (Lab - Burton and Uttoxeter) Friend the Member for Dunfermline and Dollar (Graeme Downie) said. - Link to Speech
2: Phil Brickell (Lab - Bolton West) Friend the Member for Dunfermline and Dollar (Graeme Downie) about the independence of the commissioner - Link to Speech
3: Mark Francois (Con - Rayleigh and Wickford) Member for Dunfermline and Dollar (Graeme Downie), the SNP has not made a single contribution to this - Link to Speech




Graeme Downie - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 12th February 2025 2:30 p.m.
Procedure Committee - Private Meeting
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 26th February 2025 2:30 p.m.
Procedure Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Status of independent Members of Parliament
At 3:00pm: Oral evidence
Shockat Adam MP
Iqbal Mohamed MP
At 3:45pm: Oral evidence
Rt Hon John McDonnell MP
Ian Byrne MP
View calendar - Add to calendar


Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 12th February 2025
Written Evidence - PVR0001 - Proxy Voting: Review of arrangements introduced in the 2024–25 Session

Proxy Voting: Review of arrangements introduced in the 2024–25 Session - Procedure Committee


Select Committee Inquiry
29 Jan 2025
Electronic Voting
Procedure Committee (Select)
Not accepting submissions

When a division is called in the House of Commons, Members present on the Estate who wish to cast a vote must then proceed to the division lobbies located adjacent to the Chamber to do so.  During the Covid-19 pandemic, due to social distancing requirements, Members were able to vote electronically in some divisions in the House (then known as ‘remote voting’),  but these arrangements lapsed in mid-2021 alongside other pandemic-era procedures. Several other legislatures around the world – including the House of Lords – currently operate some form of electronic voting arrangements, therefore providing different models that could be compared to those in the House of Commons which require a physical presence in a certain location for a valid vote to be cast.

This inquiry will look at the pros and cons of the current operation of divisions in the House of Commons and the potential merits and pitfalls of introducing electronic voting arrangement for divisions in the House.