53 Geoffrey Robinson debates involving HM Treasury

Oral Answers to Questions

Geoffrey Robinson Excerpts
Tuesday 22nd March 2011

(13 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Beamish Portrait Mr Kevan Jones (North Durham) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

15. What recent assessment he has made of the effect on economic growth of the spending reductions set out in the June 2010 Budget.

Geoffrey Robinson Portrait Mr Geoffrey Robinson (Coventry North West) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

16. What recent assessment he has made of the effect on economic growth of the spending reductions set out in the June 2010 Budget.

--- Later in debate ---
Justine Greening Portrait Justine Greening
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Coming from a Labour Member, given that unemployment rose during his party’s time in government, people will find that pretty hypocritical. The only way in which we will get sustainable jobs and a sustainable economy that is not as reliant on the public sector will be to carry out our deficit reduction plan. The hon. Gentleman will hear more about our growth review tomorrow.

Geoffrey Robinson Portrait Mr Robinson
- Hansard - -

Is not the Minister aware that all the independent indicators and forecasters suggest that there will be a sustained period of low growth below forecast, and that almost every single economic indicator is going in the wrong direction? Can she not therefore see that the Chancellor’s plan is simply not working? Why are the Government in denial about that?

Justine Greening Portrait Justine Greening
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I simply do not agree. As we have heard, every independent forecaster is backing our fiscal consolidation plan. The hon. Gentleman talks about evidence, but the retail sales volume grew strongly in January. The Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply purchasing managers index grew faster in January than analysts expected, while manufacturing reached a record high. Only today, the CBI industrial sector survey says that orders are going up. Our economy is rebalancing over time, and although the hon. Gentleman says that there is no evidence for that, there is such evidence. There is job creation, and that is what we will need if we are to turn our public finances around.

--- Later in debate ---
George Osborne Portrait Mr Osborne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have a copy of the hon. Gentleman’s document here. He has some excellent ideas on promoting enterprise and entrepreneurs. He will have to wait until tomorrow to see how we respond to them.

Geoffrey Robinson Portrait Mr Geoffrey Robinson (Coventry North West) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

T8. Can the Chancellor not see that the figures —current and forecast—for inflation, unemployment, growth, borrowing and even the deficit are all way off his target? Can he not see that the plan is not working, or is it a sad case of him not wanting to see?

George Osborne Portrait Mr Osborne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What I would say to the hon. Gentleman is this: we inherited a record budget deficit and there was no credible plan to deal with it. We put a plan in place and it is supported by the international community. The result of all this is that we have interest rates that are closer to Germany’s, despite having been left a deficit that is bigger than Portugal’s or Greece’s.

Banking

Geoffrey Robinson Excerpts
Wednesday 9th February 2011

(13 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Geoffrey Robinson Portrait Mr Geoffrey Robinson (Coventry North West) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Will the Chancellor confirm that, as a result of his Herculean efforts in this struggle with the banks, the names of the traders who are still going to be awarded the greatest bonuses will not be made public?

George Osborne Portrait Mr Osborne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The disclosure will be of those senior executives not on the board, but in the Walker proposals there was not even a proposal to identify individual salaries. So it is the senior executives who will be identified.

Loans to Ireland Bill

Geoffrey Robinson Excerpts
Wednesday 15th December 2010

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
George Osborne Portrait Mr Osborne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will briefly take a couple of interventions.

Geoffrey Robinson Portrait Mr Geoffrey Robinson (Coventry North West) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I have listened with interest to what the Chancellor has been saying. I appreciate the measured way in which he has presented his proposals and, indeed, the cross-party support for them, and I have no wish to disturb that support. However, will the Chancellor think again about two aspects of what he has said?

First, there is the question of the terms on which the loan will be repaid. Given that the deal is currently quite advantageous to the Irish in terms of interest rate security and, indeed, the standing of the loan, would it not be possible to negotiate the option for the UK to be repaid in sterling should there be an interesting movement in the sterling-euro exchange rate, which is quite likely?

Secondly, given that the right hon. Gentleman rather alarmingly says that this might not be the end of the matter, and that therefore he has left the way open, through just the affirmative procedure, for more substantial loans—I think I understand the situation correctly from what he says—to be made to Ireland, will he look at making such action subject to new legislation in the House, which would attract more attention and scrutiny from this body?

George Osborne Portrait Mr Osborne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are being repaid in sterling, so that answers the hon. Gentleman’s first point. I have already dealt with the second point on a number of occasions, but I shall just point out that the effect would be exactly the same. Whether I brought to the House legislation or used the affirmative procedure, I would have to get the support of Members, so materially the impact would be exactly the same: the House of Commons would be able to stop such action taking place. I should stress that I have absolutely no intention of doing so at the moment, and there is protection.