All 3 Debates between Ged Killen and Justine Greening

Women and Equalities

Debate between Ged Killen and Justine Greening
Monday 18th December 2017

(7 years ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Ged Killen Portrait Gerard Killen
- Hansard - -

Does the Minister accept the figures contained in the “Intersecting Inequalities” report by the Women’s Budget Group and the Runnymede Trust, showing the disproportionate impact of tax and benefit changes on women from black and minority ethnic backgrounds, and will the Government issue an official response?

Justine Greening Portrait Justine Greening
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am aware of that work. Part of the challenge is that we need to see much more clearly the broader picture in relation to how Budgets and Government decisions affect BAME women. The analysis that the hon. Gentleman mentions does not take into account the impact of the national living wage, the changes we have made to childcare—introducing 30 hours’ free care—the work that we are doing on reducing the gender pay gap, the introduction of shared parental leave or the introduction of increased flexible working. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has been very clear that

“what is possible falls a long way short of a full gender impact assessment”,

and that is the underlying weakness in the analysis. [Official Report, 23 November 2017, Vol. 631, c. 1167.]

Letter of correction from Justine Greening:



An error has been identified in the response I gave to the hon. Member for Rutherglen and Hamilton West (Gerard Killen).

The correct response should have been:

Ged Killen Portrait Gerard Killen
- Hansard - -

Does the Minister accept the figures contained in the “Intersecting Inequalities” report by the Women’s Budget Group and the Runnymede Trust, showing the disproportionate impact of tax and benefit changes on women from black and minority ethnic backgrounds, and will the Government issue an official response?

Justine Greening Portrait Justine Greening
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am aware of that work. Part of the challenge is that we need to see much more clearly the broader picture in relation to how Budgets and Government decisions affect BAME women. The analysis that the hon. Gentleman mentions does not take into account the work that we are doing on reducing the gender pay gap, the introduction of shared parental leave or the introduction of increased flexible working. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has been very clear that

“what is possible falls a long way short of a full gender impact assessment”,

and that is the underlying weakness in the analysis.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Ged Killen and Justine Greening
Thursday 23rd November 2017

(7 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Ged Killen Portrait Gerard Killen (Rutherglen and Hamilton West) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - -

2. What assessment she has made of the effect of the Autumn Budget 2017 on BAME women.

Justine Greening Portrait The Minister for Women and Equalities (Justine Greening)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

All Departments carefully consider the equalities impact of individual policy decisions on those who share protected characteristics, including gender and race, in line with the Government’s strong commitment to equality issues. From April 2018, the national living wage will increase by 4.4%. Past increases have disproportionately benefited women and those from BAME backgrounds, as well as the disabled.

Ged Killen Portrait Gerard Killen
- Hansard - -

Does the Minister accept the figures contained in the “Intersecting Inequalities” report by the Women’s Budget Group and the Runnymede Trust, showing the disproportionate impact of tax and benefit changes on women from black and minority ethnic backgrounds, and will the Government issue an official response?

Justine Greening Portrait Justine Greening
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am aware of that work. Part of the challenge is that we need to see much more clearly the broader picture in relation to how Budgets and Government decisions affect BAME women. The analysis that the hon. Gentleman mentions does not take into account the impact of the national living wage, the changes we have made to childcare—introducing 30 hours’ free care—the work that we are doing on reducing the gender pay gap, the introduction of shared parental leave or the introduction of increased flexible working. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has been very clear that

“what is possible falls a long way short of a full gender impact assessment”,

and that is the underlying weakness in the analysis.[Official Report, 18 December 2017, Vol. 633, c. 4MC.]

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Ged Killen and Justine Greening
Thursday 12th October 2017

(7 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Ged Killen Portrait Gerard Killen (Rutherglen and Hamilton West) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - -

Thank you, Mr Speaker. Following yesterday’s High Court decision to allow a full judicial review of the Government’s policy, does the Minister agree that it is time for the UK to join countries such as Ireland and Australia in issuing gender-neutral passports?

Justine Greening Portrait Justine Greening
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I know that the Home Office will be studying the Court ruling carefully. The Office for National Statistics is also looking generally at how we approach data in relation to gender. I simply say that, although we need to reflect the modern world in which we live, I hope that a bit of common sense can be brought to the matter.