Information between 10th April 2026 - 20th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 144 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 136 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 247 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 245 Labour Aye votes vs 4 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 139 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 263 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 95 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 267 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 159 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 269 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 159 |
|
14 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 176 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 155 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 103 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 158 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Gareth Snell speeches from: Business of the House
Gareth Snell contributed 1 speech (121 words) Thursday 16th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
|
Gareth Snell speeches from: British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme
Gareth Snell contributed 1 speech (322 words) Thursday 16th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
|
Gareth Snell speeches from: Draft Energy Prices Act 2022 (Extension of Time Limit) Regulations 2026
Gareth Snell contributed 3 speeches (1,072 words) Tuesday 14th April 2026 - General Committees Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
|
Gareth Snell speeches from: Southport Inquiry
Gareth Snell contributed 1 speech (185 words) Monday 13th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Home Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Gambling and Video Games: Regulation
Asked by: Gareth Snell (Labour (Co-op) - Stoke-on-Trent Central) Friday 17th April 2026 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of Financial Risk Assessments on tax revenues from the regulated betting and gaming sector. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Government remains committed to supporting the implementation of key measures in the 2023 white paper, including the introduction of Financial Risk Assessments (FRAs).
Following the conclusion of its pilot on FRAs, the Gambling Commission has continued to engage with gambling operators. As the independent regulator, the Gambling Commission will decide how to implement FRAs based on the best available evidence.
The existence of the online gambling illegal market does not mean that we should avoid appropriate controls on licensed operators. However, as stated in the white paper, we recognise that the threat of movement to the illegal market does exist. This is why we are working to give the Gambling Commission increased powers to support disruption and enforcement activity, and why we have announced £26 million of funding over 3 years to the Commission to enable them to increase their activity. We have also set up an Illegal Gambling Taskforce to test what more can be done to tackle the threats posed by the illegal market.
Any assessment of the impact of policies on taxation revenues is a matter for HM Treasury.
|
|
Gambling: Regulation
Asked by: Gareth Snell (Labour (Co-op) - Stoke-on-Trent Central) Friday 17th April 2026 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of Financial Risk Assessments on consumer migration to the unregulated gambling market. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Government remains committed to supporting the implementation of key measures in the 2023 white paper, including the introduction of Financial Risk Assessments (FRAs).
Following the conclusion of its pilot on FRAs, the Gambling Commission has continued to engage with gambling operators. As the independent regulator, the Gambling Commission will decide how to implement FRAs based on the best available evidence.
The existence of the online gambling illegal market does not mean that we should avoid appropriate controls on licensed operators. However, as stated in the white paper, we recognise that the threat of movement to the illegal market does exist. This is why we are working to give the Gambling Commission increased powers to support disruption and enforcement activity, and why we have announced £26 million of funding over 3 years to the Commission to enable them to increase their activity. We have also set up an Illegal Gambling Taskforce to test what more can be done to tackle the threats posed by the illegal market.
Any assessment of the impact of policies on taxation revenues is a matter for HM Treasury.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
13 Apr 2026, 6:10 p.m. - House of Commons " Gareth Snell. Home Secretary, aware that there are 28 prevent priority areas across the country. There used to be 40. Stoke on Trent was one of " Gareth Snell MP (Stoke-on-Trent Central, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
16 Apr 2026, 10:59 a.m. - House of Commons " Gareth Snell thank you very. >> Mr. Speaker. >> Mr. speaker, the 28th of April " Gareth Snell MP (Stoke-on-Trent Central, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
16 Apr 2026, 12:08 p.m. - House of Commons " Yeah. >> Gareth Snell thank you very much, Madam Deputy Speaker. I mean, let's start with the positives. I'm glad that there is now some form of recognition that there is an " Gareth Snell MP (Stoke-on-Trent Central, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme
46 speeches (6,889 words) Thursday 16th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Leigh Ingham (Lab - Stafford) Friend the Member for Stoke-on-Trent Central (Gareth Snell) has already highlighted, there is a missing - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 17th April 2026
Report - Fifty-third Report - 2 Statutory Instruments Reported Statutory Instruments (Joint Committee) Found: Hastings and Rye) Andrew Pakes (Labour; Peterborough) David Pinto-Duschinsky (Labour; Hendon) Gareth Snell |
|
Wednesday 15th April 2026
Report - Thirteenth Report of Session 2024-26 - 2 Statutory Instruments Reported Statutory Instruments (Select Committee) Found: Hastings and Rye) Andrew Pakes (Labour; Peterborough) David Pinto-Duschinsky (Labour; Hendon) Gareth Snell |