Information between 14th April 2026 - 24th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 144 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 136 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 247 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 245 Labour Aye votes vs 4 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 139 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 263 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 150 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 95 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 267 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 159 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 269 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 275 Noes - 159 |
|
14 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 176 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 237 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 21 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 155 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 103 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 158 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 61 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 289 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 158 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 156 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 159 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 150 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 149 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 144 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 152 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 149 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Gareth Snell voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 155 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Gareth Snell speeches from: Government Procurement Strategy
Gareth Snell contributed 1 speech (151 words) Wednesday 22nd April 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Gareth Snell speeches from: Antisemitic Attacks
Gareth Snell contributed 1 speech (165 words) Monday 20th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Gareth Snell speeches from: Business of the House
Gareth Snell contributed 1 speech (121 words) Thursday 16th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
|
Gareth Snell speeches from: British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme
Gareth Snell contributed 1 speech (322 words) Thursday 16th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
|
Gareth Snell speeches from: Draft Energy Prices Act 2022 (Extension of Time Limit) Regulations 2026
Gareth Snell contributed 3 speeches (1,072 words) Tuesday 14th April 2026 - General Committees Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Gambling and Video Games: Regulation
Asked by: Gareth Snell (Labour (Co-op) - Stoke-on-Trent Central) Friday 17th April 2026 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of Financial Risk Assessments on tax revenues from the regulated betting and gaming sector. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Government remains committed to supporting the implementation of key measures in the 2023 white paper, including the introduction of Financial Risk Assessments (FRAs).
Following the conclusion of its pilot on FRAs, the Gambling Commission has continued to engage with gambling operators. As the independent regulator, the Gambling Commission will decide how to implement FRAs based on the best available evidence.
The existence of the online gambling illegal market does not mean that we should avoid appropriate controls on licensed operators. However, as stated in the white paper, we recognise that the threat of movement to the illegal market does exist. This is why we are working to give the Gambling Commission increased powers to support disruption and enforcement activity, and why we have announced £26 million of funding over 3 years to the Commission to enable them to increase their activity. We have also set up an Illegal Gambling Taskforce to test what more can be done to tackle the threats posed by the illegal market.
Any assessment of the impact of policies on taxation revenues is a matter for HM Treasury.
|
|
Gambling: Regulation
Asked by: Gareth Snell (Labour (Co-op) - Stoke-on-Trent Central) Friday 17th April 2026 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact of Financial Risk Assessments on consumer migration to the unregulated gambling market. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Government remains committed to supporting the implementation of key measures in the 2023 white paper, including the introduction of Financial Risk Assessments (FRAs).
Following the conclusion of its pilot on FRAs, the Gambling Commission has continued to engage with gambling operators. As the independent regulator, the Gambling Commission will decide how to implement FRAs based on the best available evidence.
The existence of the online gambling illegal market does not mean that we should avoid appropriate controls on licensed operators. However, as stated in the white paper, we recognise that the threat of movement to the illegal market does exist. This is why we are working to give the Gambling Commission increased powers to support disruption and enforcement activity, and why we have announced £26 million of funding over 3 years to the Commission to enable them to increase their activity. We have also set up an Illegal Gambling Taskforce to test what more can be done to tackle the threats posed by the illegal market.
Any assessment of the impact of policies on taxation revenues is a matter for HM Treasury.
|
|
Energy Intensive Industries: Electricity
Asked by: Gareth Snell (Labour (Co-op) - Stoke-on-Trent Central) Thursday 23rd April 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the British Industry Supercharger scheme. Answered by Chris McDonald - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) Since 1 April 2024, eligible Energy-Intensive Industries have benefited from the British Industry Supercharger, which tackles carbon leakage by bringing industrial electricity costs closer in line with those in neighbouring countries. Subsequent evidence commissioned by the Government identified that the electricity price gap between Great Britain and other countries still presented a carbon leakage risk.
In the Modern Industrial Strategy, we announced an uplift of the Network Charging Compensation Scheme from 60% to 90% from 1 April 2026 to reduce the gap by an additional £8–10/MWh. The Government will review the Supercharger in 2029 to assess its ongoing effectiveness. |
|
Ceramics: Manufacturing Industries
Asked by: Gareth Snell (Labour (Co-op) - Stoke-on-Trent Central) Thursday 23rd April 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what support is available to the ceramics manufacturing sector to mitigate the cost of industrial gas. Answered by Chris McDonald - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) I recognise the pressure that energy costs place on ceramics manufacturers. A small number of ceramic firms are currently eligible for the British Industry Supercharger, which provides electricity cost relief and these companies are benefiting from the recent uplift to the Network Charging Compensation Scheme. I encourage the ceramics sector to engage with the upcoming review of the Supercharger. There is no equivalent scheme for industrial gas price relief, but my department always keeps industrial energy support under review. My officials, other ministers, and I engage regularly with the ceramics sector, including with Ceramics UK and individual businesses to discuss how the Government can support the sector. |
|
Ceramics: Energy
Asked by: Gareth Snell (Labour (Co-op) - Stoke-on-Trent Central) Thursday 23rd April 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what meetings and discussions his Department has had with the ceramics industry regarding energy cost relief. Answered by Chris McDonald - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) I recognise the pressure that energy costs place on ceramics manufacturers. A small number of ceramic firms are currently eligible for the British Industry Supercharger, which provides electricity cost relief and these companies are benefiting from the recent uplift to the Network Charging Compensation Scheme. I encourage the ceramics sector to engage with the upcoming review of the Supercharger. There is no equivalent scheme for industrial gas price relief, but my department always keeps industrial energy support under review. My officials, other ministers, and I engage regularly with the ceramics sector, including with Ceramics UK and individual businesses to discuss how the Government can support the sector. |
|
Manufacturing Industries: Energy
Asked by: Gareth Snell (Labour (Co-op) - Stoke-on-Trent Central) Thursday 23rd April 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of energy costs on the retention of manufacturing jobs in the West Midlands. Answered by Chris McDonald - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The Government recognises that energy costs are an important factor in the competitiveness of manufacturing businesses and in the retention of skilled jobs, including in the West Midlands.
From April 2027, the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme will reduce electricity costs for eligible manufacturing businesses in Industrial Strategy growth sectors and their foundational supply chains. In addition, the British Industry Supercharger is already reducing electricity costs for eligible energy- intensive industries in the West Midlands, including in sectors such as brick production, glass production, plastic manufacturing and paper manufacturing.
The Government continues to engage closely with businesses to monitor cost pressures, including those arising from the situation in the Middle East. |
|
Chemicals: Manufacturing Industries
Asked by: Gareth Snell (Labour (Co-op) - Stoke-on-Trent Central) Thursday 23rd April 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what support is available to the chemical manufacturing sector to mitigate the cost of industrial gas. Answered by Chris McDonald - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The Government does not currently provide support for the cost of industrial gas, including to the chemicals sector. However, we are continuing to work with industry in order to identify and explore ways in which the business environment can be improved for our foundational industries. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
16 Apr 2026, 10:59 a.m. - House of Commons " Gareth Snell thank you very. >> Mr. Speaker. >> Mr. speaker, the 28th of April " Gareth Snell MP (Stoke-on-Trent Central, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
16 Apr 2026, 12:08 p.m. - House of Commons " Yeah. >> Gareth Snell thank you very much, Madam Deputy Speaker. I mean, let's start with the positives. I'm glad that there is now some form of recognition that there is an " Gareth Snell MP (Stoke-on-Trent Central, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Apr 2026, 12:53 p.m. - House of Commons " Gareth Snell thank you. and neighbour from Staffordshire for securing this question. Could could I ask the Minister very simply, the government's taking the " Gareth Snell MP (Stoke-on-Trent Central, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
20 Apr 2026, 6:37 p.m. - House of Commons " Gareth Snell thank you very much, Madam Deputy Speaker To follow on the point from the hon. Gentleman the point from the hon. Gentleman from Mid Buckinghamshire, I think it is absolutely right that we are normalising too many aspects of anti-Semitism in this country, " Gareth Snell MP (Stoke-on-Trent Central, Labour ) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme
46 speeches (6,889 words) Thursday 16th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Leigh Ingham (Lab - Stafford) Friend the Member for Stoke-on-Trent Central (Gareth Snell) has already highlighted, there is a missing - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 24th April 2026
Report - Fifty-fourth Report - 2 Statutory Instruments Reported Statutory Instruments (Joint Committee) Found: Hastings and Rye) Andrew Pakes (Labour; Peterborough) David Pinto-Duschinsky (Labour; Hendon) Gareth Snell |
|
Friday 17th April 2026
Report - Fifty-third Report - 2 Statutory Instruments Reported Statutory Instruments (Joint Committee) Found: Hastings and Rye) Andrew Pakes (Labour; Peterborough) David Pinto-Duschinsky (Labour; Hendon) Gareth Snell |
|
Wednesday 15th April 2026
Report - Thirteenth Report of Session 2024-26 - 2 Statutory Instruments Reported Statutory Instruments (Select Committee) Found: Hastings and Rye) Andrew Pakes (Labour; Peterborough) David Pinto-Duschinsky (Labour; Hendon) Gareth Snell |