Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Oral Answers to Questions

Debbie Abrahams Excerpts
Tuesday 22nd March 2022

(2 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lee Anderson Portrait Lee Anderson (Ashfield) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

5. What progress he has made on bringing forward a Bill of Rights.

Debbie Abrahams Portrait Debbie Abrahams (Oldham East and Saddleworth) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

15. What steps he is taking to reform the Human Rights Act.

Allan Dorans Portrait Allan Dorans (Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) (SNP)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

21. What recent discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on reforming the human rights framework.

--- Later in debate ---
Dominic Raab Portrait Dominic Raab
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is bang on; he speaks in a very straightforward way, but I think that is what the public expect. We are not talking about undermining the fundamental freedoms—in fact, we are going to strengthen them, including free speech. We are making sure that those who do us harm or have been convicted of serious offences can be returned home without elastic interpretations of rights scuppering the process.

Debbie Abrahams Portrait Debbie Abrahams
- Hansard - -

Contrary to the comments of the last questioner, the Law Society has said that the Government’s Human Rights Act proposals

“do not recognise the significant benefits that have been achieved…through the HRA”,

while the General Council of the Bar says that the HRA

“has worked and continues to work well.”

Given that those who work in our justice system reject the need for changes and only despots and tyrants like Putin object to human rights other than their own, why does the Justice Secretary not scrap these proposals and stop wasting taxpayers’ time and money?

Dominic Raab Portrait Dominic Raab
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are of course familiar with the views of the Law Society and others but respectfully disagree, and in the end it is not solely our job to listen to legal practitioners, important as they are, or indeed to serve their interests, but also to stand up for victims and the public and make sure we have a common-sense approach to justice. [Interruption.] I respectfully disagree with the hon. Lady; she might want to put herself on the side of the criminals, but we will put ourselves on the side of the victims.