Information between 5th January 2026 - 15th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
7 Jan 2026 - Jury Trials - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 290 |
|
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 334 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 321 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Public Order - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 26 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 110 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 332 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Debbie Abrahams voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Debbie Abrahams speeches from: Middle East and North Africa
Debbie Abrahams contributed 1 speech (124 words) Monday 5th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Housing: Construction
Asked by: Debbie Abrahams (Labour - Oldham East and Saddleworth) Wednesday 7th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if he will make an assessment of the potential impact of enclosing motorway systems in noise barriers on the suitability of land for housebuilding. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) My Department has no current plans to make such an assessment.
The National Planning Policy Framework makes clear that planning policies and decisions should contribute to and enhance the natural and local environment by preventing new and existing development from contributing to, being put at unacceptable risk from, or being adversely affected by, unacceptable levels of noise pollution.
Planning policies and decisions should avoid noise giving rise to significant adverse impacts on health and the quality of life.
It is up to individual local planning authorities to determine what contributions should be sought to assist in mitigating the impact of unacceptable development to make it acceptable in planning terms. |
|
Property Development: Biodiversity
Asked by: Debbie Abrahams (Labour - Oldham East and Saddleworth) Wednesday 7th January 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of requiring developers to ensure that the area of vegetation in developments is at least equal to the area of the site of (a) greenfield, (b) brownfield and (c) open space deficiency sites. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) makes clear that planning policies should be based on robust and up-to-date assessments of the need for open space and should make sufficient provision for and maintain and enhance networks of green infrastructure, which includes areas of vegetation.
Natural England’s Green Infrastructure Framework helps to define what good green infrastructure ‘looks like’ for local planners, developers, and communities. The Green Infrastructure Framework includes a standard on accessible greenspace which sets criteria on size, proximity and quality.
The government is currently consulting on changes to the NPPF, including a new requirement for local plans to set out standards for green infrastructure, drawing upon Natural England’s Green Infrastructure Standards. These include a standard on accessible greenspace which sets criteria on size, proximity, and quality. The consultation can be found on gov.uk here and will remain open for responses until 10 March 2026. |
|
Solar Power
Asked by: Debbie Abrahams (Labour - Oldham East and Saddleworth) Friday 9th January 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what proportion of the target for additional renewable energy will be met by the erection of 1800 hectares of solar panels on vertical surfaces. Answered by Michael Shanks - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) We are not aware of any project in development that plans to install large numbers of solar panels on vertical surfaces. However, we are looking to increase deployment of all types of solar, including through applications such as plug-in solar which can be installed on the walls of buildings. Plug-in solar can provide opportunities for households to adopt solar more cheaply. Currently, UK regulations do not allow plug-in solar to be used in the UK, but the government has commenced a safety study with the aim of unlocking opportunities for its deployment over the next few years. |
|
Pupils: Active Travel
Asked by: Debbie Abrahams (Labour - Oldham East and Saddleworth) Thursday 8th January 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps she is taking to help ensure that schools have an active travel plan to increase the number of children who walk or cycle to school (including those who walk the last half-mile). Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education) The Education Act 1996 places a duty on local authorities to promote sustainable travel on journeys to and from places of education in their area. Sustainable travel in this context is that which improves the physical wellbeing of users, the environmental wellbeing of the area, or both. On 12 December, Active Travel England announced £626 million of funding for local authorities from 2026/27 to 2029/30 to deliver walking, wheeling and cycling schemes. This will enable more children to walk and cycle to school. It is in addition to almost £300 million funding for active travel in 2024/25 and 2025/26 announced in February. This includes £30 million to provide Bikeability cycle training to children and £8.5 million for Cycling UK, Living Streets and Modeshift to deliver walking, wheeling and cycling initiatives in schools and communities. The Modeshift STARS Education scheme supports schools and local authorities to develop and monitor school travel plans. |
|
Trams
Asked by: Debbie Abrahams (Labour - Oldham East and Saddleworth) Monday 12th January 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps she is taking with Cabinet colleagues from the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government, and leaders of local authorities, to increase tram services in towns and cities. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Government recognises the valuable role that tramways and mass transit networks can play as part of a truly integrated transport system, in the right circumstances, in our cities.
Responsibility for mass transit systems (including tramways) is devolved in England, where each local authority owns and is responsible for the operations and financial sustainability of its own system.
The Department works closely with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government on a range of strategic projects which include mass transit proposals, such as those being explored by the Cambridge Growth Company. This partnership helps ensure transport and housing priorities are considered together to support sustainable development.
Government has confirmed £15.6 billion in funding through Transport for City Regions (TCR) settlements for our largest city regions to deliver their local transport priorities, which may include mass transit. |
|
Road Traffic Offences: Speed Limits
Asked by: Debbie Abrahams (Labour - Oldham East and Saddleworth) Friday 9th January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will provide updated guidance to police forces on the enforcement of speed limits, in the context of the number of deaths caused by drivers exceeding the speed limit. Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office) Excess speed remains a major cause of death and serious injury on our roads. Anyone who breaks the speed limit should expect to face sanction. Current National Police Chiefs’ Council National Guidance on Speeding Enforcement advocates proportionality in applying the law and discretion to take account of the individual circumstances of each speeding offence and take the action they consider appropriate. Enforcement measures range from informal advice, the offer of a speed awareness course or fixed penalty, and where speeding results in a fatality to court prosecution. |
|
Immigration
Asked by: Debbie Abrahams (Labour - Oldham East and Saddleworth) Tuesday 13th January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of providing transitional arrangements for current applicants when changing the qualifying period for indefinite leave to remain. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The earned settlement model, proposed in ‘A Fairer Pathway to Settlement’, announced changes to the qualifying period for indefinite leave to remain. It is currently subject to a public consultation, running until 12 February 2026. The consultation seeks views on whether there should be transitional arrangements for those already on a pathway to settlement. Details of the earned settlement model, including any transitional arrangements for those already in the UK, will be finalised following that consultation. The final model will also be subject to economic and equality impact assessments, which we have committed to publish in due course. |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Middle East and North Africa
85 speeches (11,220 words) Monday 5th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Mentions: 1: Hamish Falconer (Lab - Lincoln) Friend the Member for Oldham East and Saddleworth (Debbie Abrahams) has written, and I will provide a - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 14th January 2026
Correspondence - Response to the Committee’s letter to the Secretary of State, following his appearance before the Committee on 19 November. Work and Pensions Committee Found: Secretary of State for Work & Pensions Caxton House Tothill Street London, SW1H 9AJ Debbie Abrahams |
|
Thursday 8th January 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Minister for Pensions, relating to the chair of the Pensions Regulator Work and Pensions Committee Found: for Work and Pensions Caxton House Tothill Street London, SW1H 9NA 3 June 2025 Debbie Abrahams |
|
Thursday 8th January 2026
Correspondence - Correspondence with the Minister for Pensions, relating to the chair of the Pensions Regulator Work and Pensions Committee Found: Best wishes Debbie Abrahams MP Chair, Work and Pensions Committee |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 14th January 2026 9:30 a.m. Work and Pensions Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Pre-appointment hearing: Chair of the Pensions Regulator View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 21st January 2026 9 a.m. Work and Pensions Committee - Oral evidence Subject: DWP’s Annual Report and Accounts 2024-25 At 9:30am: Oral evidence Sir Peter Schofield - Permanent Secretary at Department for Work and Pensions Catherine Vaughan - Director General, Finance at Department for Work and Pensions Barbara Bennett - Chief Executive and Director General, Jobs and Careers Service Operations at Department for Work and Pensions View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 28th January 2026 9 a.m. Work and Pensions Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Transition to State Pension age At 9:30am: Oral evidence Morgan Vine - Director of Policy, Grants and Influencing at Independent Age Fabian Chessell - Central Government Lead at Policy in Practice Phil Mawhinney - Poverty, Income and Work Policy at Age UK At 10:30am: Oral evidence Dr Daniella Jenkins - Member of Policy Advisory Group and Incoming Executive Director at Women’s Budget Group Justin Wray - Interim Assistant Director, Head of Long-Term Savings Policy at Association of British Insurers Tiffany Tsang - Head of DB, LGPS and Investment at Pensions UK View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th February 2026 5:30 p.m. Liaison Committee (Commons) - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 4th February 2026 9 a.m. Work and Pensions Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Disability and Ill-health in the Workplace At 10:30am: Oral evidence Sir Charlie Mayfield - Author of Keep Britain Working Report View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
8 Jan 2026
Youth employment, education and training Work and Pensions Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 12 Feb 2026) Nearly one million young people aged 16–24 are not in employment, education or training (NEET). This is a worrying statistic given the harm that being NEET can do to young people’s prospects and wellbeing. To tackle this problem, the Government has recently transferred the skills remit to DWP and announced measures such as the Youth Guarantee and apprenticeship reforms. The Work and Pensions Committee’s inquiry, which seeks to complement the independent Milburn Review into Young People and Work, will explore the causes of economic inactivity and how to help young people into work, education or training, and scrutinise the Government’s plans. Read the call for evidence for more detail about the inquiry |
|
29 Jan 2026
Realising potential: Delivering the Child Poverty Strategy Work and Pensions Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Members of the Education and Work and Pensions Select Committees have decided to undertake an inquiry that will consider how the Government can ensure it will deliver a successful Child Poverty Strategy. On 5 December 2025, the Government published its Child Poverty Strategy, which it estimates will lift 550,000 children out of poverty by the final year of this Parliament. The Strategy sets out measures across three different areas: (i) boosting family incomes; (ii) driving down the cost of essentials; and (iii) strengthening local support. Whilst the Strategy signals a positive step in the right direction, the Committees are seeking to explore if the Government is being sufficiently ambitious. The Committees will also consider how accountability, outcomes, and the longevity of the Strategy could be strengthened through targets, monitoring and evaluation, to ensure sustained work and progress to reduce child poverty. Please read Parliament's guidance on giving evidence to select committees before writing your submission. For safeguarding reasons and to avoid identification, please refrain from naming specific people, educational settings or children in your submission. We are unable to publish personal testimony evidence that is submitted anonymously or contains this information. Personal testimony evidence that cannot be published will be read and summarised into an anonymised thematic note. Your submission should be no more than 3,000 words. You can submit evidence until 23:59 on 6 March 2026. Read the call for evidence for more detail about the inquiry |