Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

David Lammy

Main Page: David Lammy (Labour - Tottenham)

Oral Answers to Questions

David Lammy Excerpts
Monday 30th June 2014

(10 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not apologise for what I said, but I apologise for referring to the hon. Gentleman.

To answer his question, of course we do not collect a central database of every single brownfield site in the land and how they are affected by very recent policy announcements. It is very clear that local authorities need to do everything they can to make sure that sites are viable by setting section 106 agreements and the community infrastructure levy at an appropriate level. Secondly, there is no way that a developer can argue that a site is not viable for development unless they have clear public evidence to demonstrate why it is financially unviable.

David Lammy Portrait Mr David Lammy (Tottenham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The Minister has made much in the House of accelerating development on brownfield land and the Secretary of State has said a lot about speeding up planning. Why has the development for Spurs, which is currently with the Department with regard to a compulsory purchase order, been with the Department for 14 months? Might we reach a decision shortly and will he confirm that the Secretary of State is not an Arsenal supporter?

Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I would never dare to tread into the question of people’s football loyalties, particularly not at this time. I understand the right hon. Gentleman’s frustrations, but the matter has not entirely been with the Department as we have had to refer back to parties on some complex questions. I am keen to make a decision as soon as possible, but I know that he will want that decision to hold up in court and it is therefore important to ensure that it is robust.