All 3 Debates between David Evennett and Andrew Jones

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between David Evennett and Andrew Jones
Thursday 25th March 2021

(3 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
David Evennett Portrait Sir David Evennett (Bexleyheath and Crayford) (Con)
- Hansard - -

What steps the Government are taking to increase the opportunities for small businesses to bid for Government contracts.

Andrew Jones Portrait Andrew Jones (Harrogate and Knaresborough) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What steps the Government is taking to increase the opportunities for small businesses to bid for Government contracts.

South-Eastern Rail Franchise

Debate between David Evennett and Andrew Jones
Tuesday 23rd April 2019

(5 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Andrew Jones Portrait Andrew Jones
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is a very interesting question. I would expect the rail review to make some interesting recommendations about devolution. I am personally a fan of devolution, but we had better see what it says before commenting on the outcome.

David Evennett Portrait Sir David Evennett (Bexleyheath and Crayford) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I note my hon. Friend’s statement today on the south-eastern rail franchise. I am, of course, bitterly disappointed that we have not made any progress on this matter. In the meantime, my constituents continue to suffer a poor service into London. It is also disappointing, but rather ironic, that, just like the rail service, all we seem to see from his Department is continual delay. As he is well aware, improvements are desperately needed to our service in the borough of Bexley—and not later this year, next year or sometimes never. Our constituents are paying more money for a poor service. What we are expecting is a decision so that we can look to a better future and the travelling public from Bexley have a better service. At the moment, they do not.

Andrew Jones Portrait Andrew Jones
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My right hon. Friend makes a very important point. He is a diligent campaigner on rail issues for his constituency. We saw that at an important level when there was the landslip earlier this year. He was a great champion in making sure that the voices of his travelling constituents were heard in this House. I cannot yet tell him when we will be making the announcement on the decision on who wins the south-eastern franchise competition, but I can tell him that I am extremely keen to get the benefits that the franchise will bring to his constituents. I will make sure that he is kept fully posted on progress.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between David Evennett and Andrew Jones
Monday 20th June 2011

(13 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
David Evennett Portrait Mr David Evennett (Bexleyheath and Crayford) (Con)
- Hansard - -

9. What plans he has to increase the powers of local authorities to tackle unauthorised development.

Andrew Jones Portrait Andrew Jones (Harrogate and Knaresborough) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

16. What plans he has to increase the powers of local authorities to tackle unauthorised development.

Lord Pickles Portrait The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Mr Eric Pickles)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Government take the problem of unauthorised development very seriously. There are already strong powers to enable local planning authorities to take action, and the Localism Bill, which begins its Committee stage in the House of Lords today, includes provisions in clauses 108 to 111 to strengthen authorities’ powers to tackle unauthorised developments, particularly when people have deliberately tried to conceal them.