Information between 19th November 2024 - 9th December 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
27 Nov 2024 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context David Davis voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 176 |
27 Nov 2024 - Finance Bill - View Vote Context David Davis voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 112 Noes - 333 |
25 Nov 2024 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context David Davis voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 335 |
29 Nov 2024 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context David Davis voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 23 Conservative Aye votes vs 92 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 275 |
Speeches |
---|
David Davis speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
David Davis contributed 2 speeches (661 words) 2nd reading Friday 29th November 2024 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
David Davis speeches from: Speaker’s Statement
David Davis contributed 1 speech (309 words) Monday 25th November 2024 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
David Davis speeches from: Israel-Gaza Conflict: Arrest Warrants
David Davis contributed 1 speech (92 words) Monday 25th November 2024 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
David Davis speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
David Davis contributed 1 speech (76 words) Wednesday 20th November 2024 - Commons Chamber Department for Science, Innovation & Technology |
Written Answers |
---|
Artificial Intelligence: Public Sector
Asked by: David Davis (Conservative - Goole and Pocklington) Thursday 21st November 2024 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, with reference to the report entitled Securing meaningful transparency of public sector use of AI: Comparative approaches across five jurisdictions, published by the Public Law Project in October 2024, whether he has made an assessment of the potential merits of introducing a requirement on public bodies to notify individuals when a decision has been taken about them that was (a) made and (b) supported by (i) AI, (ii) an algorithmic and (iii) automated tool. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Central government departments and arm’s-length bodies (ALBs) have been working to draft Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard (ATRS) records since this became mandatory earlier this year. Publication plans were disrupted by the general election, but multiple records are expected to be published soon.
Since the introduction of a mandatory requirement for use of ATRS in cross-government policy, we have seen a significant acceleration in progress towards adopting it, which will be reflected soon in published records. As such, we do not believe that legislation is necessary at this time. We will continue to explore further options for encouraging and enforcing the use of the ATRS, and the need to extend the breadth of the policy beyond central government.
|
Artificial Intelligence: Public Sector
Asked by: David Davis (Conservative - Goole and Pocklington) Thursday 21st November 2024 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, with reference to the report entitled Securing meaningful transparency of public sector use of AI: Comparative approaches across five jurisdictions, published by the Public Law Project in October 2024, whether he has made an assessment of the potential merits of putting public sector compliance with the Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard on a statutory footing. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Central government departments and arm’s-length bodies (ALBs) have been working to draft Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard (ATRS) records since this became mandatory earlier this year. Publication plans were disrupted by the general election, but multiple records are expected to be published soon.
Since the introduction of a mandatory requirement for use of ATRS in cross-government policy, we have seen a significant acceleration in progress towards adopting it, which will be reflected soon in published records. As such, we do not believe that legislation is necessary at this time. We will continue to explore further options for encouraging and enforcing the use of the ATRS, and the need to extend the breadth of the policy beyond central government.
|
Government Departments: Artificial Intelligence
Asked by: David Davis (Conservative - Goole and Pocklington) Thursday 21st November 2024 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, with reference to the Answer of 14 May 2024 to Question 24976 on Artificial Intelligence: Government Departments, what recent estimate he has made of when phase one Departments will publish their first Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard (ATRS) records on the ATRS hub. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Central government departments and arm’s-length bodies (ALBs) have been working to draft Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard (ATRS) records since this became mandatory earlier this year. Publication plans were disrupted by the general election, but multiple records are expected to be published soon.
Since the introduction of a mandatory requirement for use of ATRS in cross-government policy, we have seen a significant acceleration in progress towards adopting it, which will be reflected soon in published records. As such, we do not believe that legislation is necessary at this time. We will continue to explore further options for encouraging and enforcing the use of the ATRS, and the need to extend the breadth of the policy beyond central government.
|
Artificial Intelligence: Public Sector
Asked by: David Davis (Conservative - Goole and Pocklington) Thursday 21st November 2024 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, with reference to the report entitled Securing meaningful transparency of public sector use of AI: Comparative approaches across five jurisdictions, published by the Public Law Project in October 2024, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of introducing a requirement on public bodies, when a decision has been taken about an individual that was (a) made and (b) supported by (i) AI, (ii) an algorithmic and (iii) automated tool, to proactively provide an explanation of (A) how and (B) why the decision was reached. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Central government departments and arm’s-length bodies (ALBs) have been working to draft Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard (ATRS) records since this became mandatory earlier this year. Publication plans were disrupted by the general election, but multiple records are expected to be published soon.
Since the introduction of a mandatory requirement for use of ATRS in cross-government policy, we have seen a significant acceleration in progress towards adopting it, which will be reflected soon in published records. As such, we do not believe that legislation is necessary at this time. We will continue to explore further options for encouraging and enforcing the use of the ATRS, and the need to extend the breadth of the policy beyond central government.
|
Agriculture: Inheritance Tax
Asked by: David Davis (Conservative - Goole and Pocklington) Tuesday 26th November 2024 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department plans to publish risk assessments of proposed changes to (a) Agricultural Property Relief and (b) Business Property Relief. Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) At Autumn Budget 2024, the Government took a number of difficult but necessary decisions on tax, welfare, and spending to restore economic stability, fix the public finances, and support public services.
The Government published information about the reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief at www.gov.uk/government/publications/agricultural-property-relief-and-business-property-relief-reforms/summary-of-reforms-to-agricultural-property-relief-and-business-property-relief. Further explanatory information is also set out at www.gov.uk/government/news/what-are-the-changes-to-agricultural-property-relief.
In accordance with standard practice, a tax information and impact note will be published alongside the draft legislation before the relevant Finance Bill. |
Down's Syndrome
Asked by: David Davis (Conservative - Goole and Pocklington) Monday 2nd December 2024 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 30 July 2024 to Question 1398 on Down Syndrome Act 2022, what recent progress his Department has made on producing statutory guidance under the Down Syndrome Act 2022; and whether he plans to publish that guidance before the end of the year. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) Officials are taking forward, as a priority, development of the Down Syndrome guidance, as required under the Down Syndrome Act 2022. Engagement with relevant stakeholders, including people with Down syndrome and organisations that work in support of people with Down syndrome, people with other genetic conditions, and a learning disability, or both, is taking place to inform the guidance. Most recently, a roundtable on improving life outcomes for people with Down syndrome was held on 26 November 2024. We expect to publish the draft guidance for public consultation as soon as possible in the new year. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
European Union (Withdrawal Arrangements) Bill
255 speeches (38,734 words) 2nd reading Friday 6th December 2024 - Commons Chamber Northern Ireland Office Mentions: 1: Peter Dowd (Lab - Bootle) Member for Goole and Pocklington (David Davis) said:“I start by unreservedly congratulating my right - Link to Speech |
Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
261 speeches (42,491 words) 2nd reading Friday 29th November 2024 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: Anna Dixon (Lab - Shipley) Member for Goole and Pocklington (David Davis), who has just spoken. - Link to Speech 2: Julian Lewis (Con - New Forest East) Friend the Member for Goole and Pocklington (David Davis). - Link to Speech |
Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation
44 speeches (20,578 words) Thursday 21st November 2024 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: Andy Slaughter (Lab - Hammersmith and Chiswick) Member for Goole and Pocklington (David Davis) and my right hon. - Link to Speech |