Information between 8th July 2025 - 18th July 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 346 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 340 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 415 Noes - 98 |
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 338 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 35 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 130 Noes - 443 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour No votes vs 47 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 334 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 416 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour Aye votes vs 47 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 242 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 356 Labour No votes vs 8 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 35 Noes - 469 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 401 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 330 Labour Aye votes vs 37 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 135 |
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 364 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 370 |
15 Jul 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 342 |
15 Jul 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 344 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 440 |
14 Jul 2025 - Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Definition of Newspaper) Order 2025
Enterprise Act 2002 (Amendment of Section 58 Considerations) Order 2025 - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 10 Noes - 2 |
14 Jul 2025 - Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Definition of Newspaper) Order 2025
Enterprise Act 2002 (Amendment of Section 58 Considerations) Order 2025 - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 10 Noes - 2 |
16 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 54 |
16 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context Damien Egan voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 334 Noes - 54 |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Wednesday 16th July 2025
Oral Evidence - Department for Work and Pensions, and Department for Work and Pensions Work and Pensions Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Debbie Abrahams (Chair); Johanna Baxter; Steve Darling; Damien Egan |
Bill Documents |
---|
Jul. 09 2025
Crime and Policing Bill 2024-25: Progress of the bill Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26 Briefing papers Found: Matt Vickers supported the amendment.208 At second reading, Damien Egan MP (Lab) had also questioned |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
16 Jul 2025
Employment support for disabled people Work and Pensions Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 29 Sep 2025) With the disability employment gap persistently at nearly 30%, the Government has announced it will spend an additional £2.2 billion on employment support over the next four years. The Committee will explore the reasons behind the disability employment gap, scrutinise Government programmes to support disabled people into work and make recommendations for future support. |
30 Jul 2025
Child Maintenance Service Work and Pensions Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Millions of children and parents are served by the Child Maintenance Service. But is it working as effectively as it could be so that the best interests of the child are being met? The Government has recently proposed changes to how the Child Maintenance Service administers payments. This inquiry will look at those proposals and more broadly how to boost the Service’s effectiveness in increasing payment compliance rates and improving the way it deals with families.
Read the call for evidence for more detail about the inquiry. |