Connor Naismith Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Connor Naismith

Information between 9th July 2025 - 8th August 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Connor Naismith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 333 Labour Aye votes vs 47 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 242
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Connor Naismith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 416
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Connor Naismith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 356 Labour No votes vs 8 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 35 Noes - 469
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Connor Naismith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 331 Labour No votes vs 47 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 334
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Connor Naismith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 333 Labour No votes vs 35 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 130 Noes - 443
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Connor Naismith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 401
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Connor Naismith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 330 Labour Aye votes vs 37 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 135
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Connor Naismith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 364 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 370
15 Jul 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context
Connor Naismith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 344 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 440
15 Jul 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context
Connor Naismith voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 342
14 Jul 2025 - Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Definition of Newspaper) Order 2025 Enterprise Act 2002 (Amendment of Section 58 Considerations) Order 2025 - View Vote Context
Connor Naismith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 10 Noes - 2
14 Jul 2025 - Draft Enterprise Act 2002 (Definition of Newspaper) Order 2025 Enterprise Act 2002 (Amendment of Section 58 Considerations) Order 2025 - View Vote Context
Connor Naismith voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 10 Noes - 2


Speeches
Connor Naismith speeches from: West Coast Main Line
Connor Naismith contributed 11 speeches (1,932 words)
Tuesday 15th July 2025 - Westminster Hall
Department for Transport
Connor Naismith speeches from: UK-France Migration: Co-operation
Connor Naismith contributed 1 speech (97 words)
Monday 14th July 2025 - Commons Chamber
Home Office
Connor Naismith speeches from: Condition of Roads: Cheshire
Connor Naismith contributed 1 speech (89 words)
Monday 14th July 2025 - Commons Chamber
Department for Transport


Written Answers
Medicine: Students
Asked by: Connor Naismith (Labour - Crewe and Nantwich)
Wednesday 23rd July 2025

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he has made an assessment of the potential impact of changes in funding for (a) fifth year medical students and (b) above on the NHS.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government reviews and updates the NHS Bursary rules annually and keeps the funding arrangements for all medical students under close review to ensure they meet the needs of students and the National Health Service.

As set out in our 10-Year Health Plan, we will explore options to improve financial support for students from the lowest socioeconomic background so that they are able to thrive at medical school.

Cycling: Helmets
Asked by: Connor Naismith (Labour - Crewe and Nantwich)
Thursday 24th July 2025

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if she will take legislative steps to require cyclists to wear helmets.

Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The Government strongly encourages cyclists to wear helmets, and this is reflected in The Highway Code, but there are no plans to mandate this.

A previous review of this matter concluded that the safety benefits of mandating helmets would be likely to be outweighed by the fact that it would put some people off cycling, thereby reducing the wider health and environmental benefits.

Energy: Standing Charges
Asked by: Connor Naismith (Labour - Crewe and Nantwich)
Friday 25th July 2025

Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero:

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, whether his Department plans to (a) abolish and (b) reform the standing charge.

Answered by Miatta Fahnbulleh - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

The Government knows that, for many consumers, too much of the burden of the bill is placed on standing charges. We are committed to lowering the cost of standing charges and have worked constructively with the regulator, Ofgem, on this issue.

Firstly, Ofgem have been working to ensure that domestic consumers can choose tariffs with low or no standing charges Ofgem took a further step towards this goal this week, announcing proposals to require suppliers to offer their customers low or no standing charge tariffs from early 2026.

Secondly, Ofgem have been reviewing how ‘fixed’ costs, which tend to be funded through standing charges, should be recovered in the future energy system. This includes whether those fixed costs could be recovered in more progressive ways, and we are working closely with the regulator on this.




Connor Naismith mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
West Coast Main Line
44 speeches (11,190 words)
Tuesday 15th July 2025 - Westminster Hall
Department for Transport
Mentions:
1: Navendu Mishra (Lab - Stockport) Friend the Member for Crewe and Nantwich (Connor Naismith) on securing this debate. - Link to Speech
2: Chris Webb (Lab - Blackpool South) Friend the Member for Crewe and Nantwich (Connor Naismith) for securing this debate—although I feel it - Link to Speech
3: Andrew Cooper (Lab - Mid Cheshire) Friend the Member for Crewe and Nantwich (Connor Naismith) for securing this timely debate. - Link to Speech
4: David Simmonds (Con - Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner) Member for Crewe and Nantwich (Connor Naismith) on securing the debate. Hon. - Link to Speech
5: Lilian Greenwood (Lab - Nottingham South) Friend the Member for Crewe and Nantwich (Connor Naismith) on securing the debate. - Link to Speech