Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Oral Answers to Questions

Clive Betts Excerpts
Monday 30th June 2014

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We should always be willing to learn from other countries, but we should also not talk down our own achievements. More than two thirds of all new houses are built on brownfield sites, but we can always do more and that is why my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has proposed housing zones, with a package of £400 million, to help put in place local development orders on brownfield land so that development comes through more quickly.

Clive Betts Portrait Mr Clive Betts (Sheffield South East) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I have referred previously to paragraphs 47 onwards of the national planning policy framework, which mean that sites have to be deliverable and viable to be included in a local plan. Many developers are objecting to brownfield sites being included and want greenfield sites to be substituted instead because of this requirement. As a result of the package to which the Minister has just referred, how many of the sites excluded from local plans by paragraph 47 requirements will now be able to be included by local authorities?

Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I take this opportunity briefly to apologise to the hon. Gentleman for having referred to him during a debate last week when he was not present, and for not having given him notice of that—

Clive Betts Portrait Mr Betts
- Hansard - -

And does the Minister apologise for what he said, as well?

Nick Boles Portrait Nick Boles
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not apologise for what I said, but I apologise for referring to the hon. Gentleman.

To answer his question, of course we do not collect a central database of every single brownfield site in the land and how they are affected by very recent policy announcements. It is very clear that local authorities need to do everything they can to make sure that sites are viable by setting section 106 agreements and the community infrastructure levy at an appropriate level. Secondly, there is no way that a developer can argue that a site is not viable for development unless they have clear public evidence to demonstrate why it is financially unviable.