Information between 29th November 2025 - 9th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Chi Onwurah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 182 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Chi Onwurah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 347 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 164 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Chi Onwurah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 176 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Chi Onwurah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 346 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 369 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Chi Onwurah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 340 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 364 Noes - 167 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Chi Onwurah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 350 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 166 |
|
2 Dec 2025 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Chi Onwurah voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 357 Noes - 174 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Chi Onwurah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 298 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Chi Onwurah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 299 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Chi Onwurah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 304 |
|
3 Dec 2025 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Chi Onwurah voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 296 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 154 Noes - 303 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Chi Onwurah speeches from: Local Elections
Chi Onwurah contributed 1 speech (93 words) Thursday 4th December 2025 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Artificial Intelligence
Asked by: Chi Onwurah (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West) Monday 8th December 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what information her Department holds on the proportion of chatbots deployed in the UK that use search-based functionality as part of their responses; and what assessment she has made of the whether AI chatbot users in the UK are adequately protected from harmful content. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Generative AI services, including chatbots, that allow users to share content with one another or that search live websites to provide search results are regulated under the Online Safety Act and must protect users from illegal content and children from harmful and age-inappropriate content. The Secretary of State confirmed in Parliament this week that the government is considering how AI chatbots interact with the Act and also urged Ofcom to use its existing powers to ensure that AI chatbots are safe for children. Where evidence demonstrates that further action is necessary to protect children and the wider public, we will not hesitate to act. |
|
Dental Health: Research
Asked by: Chi Onwurah (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West) Monday 8th December 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he plans to bring forward a strategy for dental health research. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department invests over £1.6 billion each year on research through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). Whilst there are currently no plans to develop a dental health research strategy, the NIHR continues to welcome funding applications for research into any aspect of human health and care, including dental research. These applications are subject to peer review and judged in open competition, with awards being made on the basis of the importance of the topic to patients and health and care services, value for money, and scientific quality. The Department, through the NIHR, funds clinical academic training for doctors and dentists through the Integrated Academic Training Programme. This includes Academic Clinical Fellowships (ACFs) at the pre-doctoral level and Clinical Lectureships (CLs) at the post-doctoral level. Over the last five years, 91 ACFs and 24 CLs were recruited in dentistry. The Department also funds the NIHR Oral Health Research Incubator, which is a researcher-led initiative aimed at building dental research capacity at the national level. Ongoing research at Newcastle University is investigating the roles and skill utilisation of professionals in dental practice. In addition, investments in NIHR infrastructure support the country’s leading experts to develop and deliver high-quality translational, clinical, and applied research that is funded by the NIHR’s research programmes, other public funders of research, charities, and the life sciences industry. For example, through the NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre’s Oral and Dental Medicine research theme. |
|
Health Services: Innovation
Asked by: Chi Onwurah (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West) Monday 8th December 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 6 November 2025 to Question 83750 on Health Services: Innovation, what mechanisms are in place to monitor and evaluate the successful adoption and diffusion of health innovations across the NHS; which bodies are responsible for measuring this impact at (a) national and (b) regional levels; and how these findings inform future commissioning and policy decisions. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) No organisations hold a statutory responsibility specifically to monitor or evaluate the rates of the successful adoption and spread of health innovation in the National Health Service. However, the NHS Business Services Authority, on behalf of the Office for Life Sciences, publishes the Innovation Scorecard every six months. This is of significant use to the NHS and has been published since January 2013. The Innovation Scorecard reports on the use of medicines and medicine groupings in the NHS in England, which have been positively appraised by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). It reveals what NICE-recommended treatments are available at a local level within trusts and integrated care boards, as well as at national and NHS England region levels. Data limitations mean it cannot be used for performance management, but it does allow the NHS to identify variation, which, through discussion, can be explained, challenged, or acted upon. Several organisations organise additional detailed evaluations for specific groups of health innovations. For example, the Health Innovation Network (HIN) oversees numerous national programmes which monitor the uptake and spread of selected health innovations. This helps them, and NHS England, determine how best to improve the uptake of these innovations. Regionally, HINs also undertake monitoring and evaluation for selected innovations that they support. Integrated care boards and providers may also choose to conduct their own evaluations, using local data to understand whether innovations deliver expected improvements in outcomes or efficiency. |
|
Electrical Goods: Repairs and Maintenance
Asked by: Chi Onwurah (Labour - Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West) Monday 8th December 2025 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, if he will take steps with the Office for Product Safety and Standards to ensure that regulations and repairability indexes for small electrical devices promote not only professional repair services but also end-user self-repair. Answered by Martin McCluskey - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The Ecodesign for Energy-Related Products and Energy Information Regulations 2021 require manufacturers of a number of products to provide certain spare parts to end-users as well as professional repairers. The Government continues to review ecodesign and energy labelling regulations for other small electrical devices as part of our ongoing programme of work. We are committed to introducing repairability measures, including those designed to support end-users, where doing so is appropriate. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
4 Dec 2025, 10:54 a.m. - House of Commons " Chi Onwurah thank. " Dame Chi Onwurah MP (Newcastle upon Tyne Central and West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 9th December 2025 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Digital inclusion and telecoms At 9:30am: Oral evidence Paul Hollingshead - Lead, UK & Europe at Saronic At 9:45am: Oral evidence The Baroness Lloyd of Effra CBE - Minister for Digital Economy at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Kevin Adams - Interim Director Digital Infrastructure at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Jenny Hall - Director Digital and Data Policy at Department for Science, Innovation and Technology View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 15th December 2025 1:30 p.m. Liaison Committee (Commons) - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Prime Minister At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer MP - Prime Minister View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 6th January 2026 9 a.m. Science, Innovation and Technology Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
6 Nov 2025
The science and regulation of hair and beauty products and treatments Science, Innovation and Technology Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions Hair and beauty products (chemicals applied to the hair or body for cosmetic purposes) and treatments (cosmetic procedures typically performed by specialists) can cause harm to consumers if they contain unregulated ingredients or if they are improperly administered. The inquiry will respond to recent research which has led to concerns about the current scientific evidence base and regulation for these products, as well as the required training and qualifications of specialists performing treatments. The inquiry will also investigate the growing concern that certain products that are commonly used by marginalised groups, such as creams to ‘relax’ afro-type hair and synthetic hair, can contain harmful chemicals.
|
|
24 Nov 2025
Data security across government Science, Innovation and Technology Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions On 15 July 2025 the Defence Secretary told the House of Commons about a large-scale data breach that had taken place in 2022, when a Ministry of Defence official emailed a spreadsheet to an external contact, unaware that it contained details relating to 18,700 Afghan nationals applying for relocation. In the wake of this, and other serious public sector data breaches, the committee chair wrote to the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, and the Information Commissioner, to find out more about data hygiene and data management practices across government. This led to the publication in August 2025 of an Information Security Review which had been undertaken by the Cabinet Office in 2023 but not published. In August and then October 2025 the government announced further details of their intended response to the Afghan data breach - and others like it – and the subsequent review. On 21 October 2025 the committee questioned the Information Commissioner about his office's response to the February 2022 breach and wider learnings for government information and data security. In February 2026, the committee will question the Security Minister and Minister for Digital Government and Data on how the government has responded to the breach, and implemented the recommendations made in the Information Security Review. |