Information between 11th September 2025 - 21st September 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 66 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 66 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 66 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 66 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 66 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 66 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 65 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 66 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 66 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 65 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 65 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161 |
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 66 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163 |
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 340 Noes - 77 |
16 Sep 2025 - Child Poverty Strategy (Removal of Two Child Limit) - View Vote Context Bobby Dean voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 61 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 1 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 79 |
Speeches |
---|
Bobby Dean speeches from: Official Secrets Act
Bobby Dean contributed 1 speech (81 words) Monday 15th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
Written Answers |
---|
Council Housing
Asked by: Bobby Dean (Liberal Democrat - Carshalton and Wallington) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether she plans to introduce a national (a) framework and (b) funding stream to support local authorities in purchasing ex-council homes in areas of (i) high vacancy and (ii) visible decline. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government has no plans to introduce a national framework and funding stream of the kind suggested. |
Sleeping Rough: Charities
Asked by: Bobby Dean (Liberal Democrat - Carshalton and Wallington) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential impact of financial incentives requested by (a) landlords and (b) agencies on the ability of charities to house rough sleepers. Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) It is the responsibility of Councils and their partners to develop a range of housing options that reflect local needs, including housing with support and making use of the private rented sector where is suitable for the needs of the individual.
Financial support including helping individuals with deposits, first month’s rent in advance, or one-off payments to landlords can be an effective means of securing private rented tenancies for people who have experienced rough sleeping. |
Continuing Care
Asked by: Bobby Dean (Liberal Democrat - Carshalton and Wallington) Friday 12th September 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what plans his Department has to review the (a) necessity and (b) frequency of annual reviews within NHS Continuing Health Care; and whether he plans to adjust those requirements. Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare and NHS-funded Nursing Care outlines the necessity and frequency of NHS Continuing Healthcare reviews. A review should be undertaken within three months of the eligibility decision being made, and then on at least an annual basis. Reviews should primarily focus on whether the care plan or arrangements remain appropriate to meet the individual’s needs. It is expected that, in the majority of cases, there will be no need to reassess for eligibility. The frequency, format and attendance at reviews should be proportionate to the situation in question. |
CCTV and Video Recordings: Housing
Asked by: Bobby Dean (Liberal Democrat - Carshalton and Wallington) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether he plans to introduce measures to ensure that (a) privacy and (b) data protection standards are maintained for the use of (i) CCTV and (ii) other video recording devices on domestic buildings. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The UK’s Data protection framework is technology-neutral, with its principles, namely, transparency, accountability and fairness, applying to all technology which uses personal data, including CCTV. There are also general rules on how personal data should be processed and safeguarded. If domestic CCTV captures someone else's property or communal space, then the UK’s data protection legislation applies as the images and voices of other people will be captured and this is classified as personal information. The Information Commissioner’s Office has issued guidance on domestic and commercial use of surveillance equipment, including CCTV. |
CCTV and Video Recordings: Housing
Asked by: Bobby Dean (Liberal Democrat - Carshalton and Wallington) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of regulations governing the use of (a) CCTV and (b) other video recording devices on domestic buildings. Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The UK’s Data protection framework is technology-neutral. If domestic CCTV or other video recording devices capture someone else's property or communal space, then the UK’s data protection legislation applies as the images and voices of other people will be captured and this is classified as personal information. The UK’s Data protection legislation is monitored and enforced independently of Government. The Information Commissioner’s Office has issued guidance on domestic use of surveillance equipment, including CCTV. |
Flats: Repossession Orders
Asked by: Bobby Dean (Liberal Democrat - Carshalton and Wallington) Tuesday 16th September 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of an increase in the number of leasehold flat forfeitures due to leaseholders being unable to pay costs arising from building safety defects on the mortgage securitisation market; and if she will make a statement. Answered by Samantha Dixon - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to Question UIN 30259 on 19 February 2025.
Government remains committed to removing the disproportionate and draconian threat of forfeiture as a means of ensuring compliance with a lease agreement. Qualifying leaseholders are protected from costs of remedying specific historical safety defects under the Building Safety Act, while at the same time we ensure those who built defective buildings take responsibility for remedying them, and wider industry contributes to fixing the problem.
Looking specifically at mortgage securitisation, my officials speak to the mortgage lending sector who we would expect to raise if an issue. |
Calendar |
---|
Tuesday 14th October 2025 9:45 a.m. Treasury Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
Wednesday 15th October 2025 2 p.m. Treasury Committee - Oral evidence Subject: AI in financial services At 2:15pm: Oral evidence Jessica Rusu - Chief Data and Information and Intelligence Officer at Financial Conduct Authority Tom Mutton - Director of Central Bank Digital Currency at Bank of England Jonathan Hall - External Member, Financial Policy Committee at Bank of England View calendar - Add to calendar |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Wednesday 17th September 2025
Correspondence - Letters to AI providers, dated 17 September 2025 Treasury Committee |