Information between 28th October 2024 - 7th November 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Blake Stephenson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 378 Noes - 116 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Blake Stephenson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 110 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 400 Noes - 122 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Blake Stephenson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 108 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 455 Noes - 125 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Blake Stephenson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 106 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 383 Noes - 184 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Blake Stephenson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 450 Noes - 120 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Blake Stephenson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 100 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 373 Noes - 110 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Blake Stephenson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 111 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 401 Noes - 120 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Blake Stephenson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 108 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 454 Noes - 124 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Blake Stephenson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 110 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 400 Noes - 120 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Blake Stephenson voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 111 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Blake Stephenson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 361 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Blake Stephenson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 101 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 124 Noes - 361 |
Speeches |
---|
Blake Stephenson speeches from: Income Tax (Charge)
Blake Stephenson contributed 2 speeches (593 words) Monday 4th November 2024 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
Blake Stephenson speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Blake Stephenson contributed 2 speeches (104 words) Tuesday 29th October 2024 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
Blake Stephenson speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Blake Stephenson contributed 1 speech (25 words) Monday 28th October 2024 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
Written Answers |
---|
Schools: Mid Bedfordshire
Asked by: Blake Stephenson (Conservative - Mid Bedfordshire) Monday 4th November 2024 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what plans her Department has to replace capital funding originally allocated to (a) Arnold Academy, (b) Parkfields Middle School, (c) Toddington St. George Church of England School, and (d) The Firs Lower School in Mid Bedfordshire constituency through the Condition Improvement Fund. Answered by Stephen Morgan - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The department has written to the responsible bodies to encourage them to reapply to the Condition Improvement Fund (CIF), which opened for applications for the 2025/26 round on 22 October 2024. The bodies should closely review the guidance and all the documents provided in support of their application to ensure their appropriateness as evidence of project need. In cases of an urgent building condition issue that cannot wait for funding in the current CIF round, schools can apply for Urgent Capital Support funding. More details on both funding routes are available on GOV.UK at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/condition-improvement-fund. |
Free Schools: Bedford
Asked by: Blake Stephenson (Conservative - Mid Bedfordshire) Monday 4th November 2024 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether the planned free school in Bedford Borough is under review by her Department. Answered by Stephen Morgan - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) The government wants to ensure children achieve and thrive in education, whatever type of school they are in, including free schools. School capacity varies from place to place, and demand for places varies from area to area and year to year, so the department will continue to ensure the opening of new schools only where they are needed.
Departmental officials are working with local authorities, academy trusts and other partners to take forward work on the review of mainstream free school projects over the autumn and have written to them, setting out the next steps in relation to individual projects. |
National Insurance Contributions
Asked by: Blake Stephenson (Conservative - Mid Bedfordshire) Monday 28th October 2024 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if she will make an assessment of the implications for her policies on National Insurance Contributions for employees of paragraph 4 of the report by the Office for Budget Responsibility entitled The economic effects of policy measures, published in October 2021. Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) In the October 2021 Economic and Fiscal Outlook the OBR set out “a central forecast to 2026-27 taking account of recent data and Government policies announced up to and including the October 2021 Budget and Spending Review”. The Government does not speculate on tax changes outside of fiscal events. |
Flood Control
Asked by: Blake Stephenson (Conservative - Mid Bedfordshire) Monday 28th October 2024 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of reforming the planning system to introduce new measures to help reduce flood risk. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government recognises the devastating impact which flooding can have on communities, and the role the planning system plays in directing development to areas of lowest possible flood risk. National planning policy is clear that inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding should be avoided. In the recent consultation on proposed reforms to the National Planning Policy Framework, we sought views on how the planning system can be more effective in managing flood risk. The consultation closed on the 24 September and officials in my department are currently analysing responses with a view to publishing a government response before the end of the year. |
Private Education: VAT
Asked by: Blake Stephenson (Conservative - Mid Bedfordshire) Wednesday 6th November 2024 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment her Department has made of the impact of imposing VAT on private school fees on the UK’s relations with European and international allies. Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) On 30th October, at Budget, the Government confirmed that, as of 1 January 2025, all education, boarding, and vocational training provided for a charge by a private school in the UK will be subject to VAT at the standard rate of 20 per cent.
International schools make an important contribution to the connections between the UK and its international partners, which the Government remains committed to strengthening and deepening further. While they can be subsidised by foreign governments, depending on their funding structure, many international schools still charge fees comparable to that of a lot of British private schools, many of which do not necessarily follow the UK curriculum, nor teach exclusively in English. It would therefore be unfair to carve international schools out of policy changes whilst comparable independent schools remain within scope.
|
Private Education: VAT
Asked by: Blake Stephenson (Conservative - Mid Bedfordshire) Wednesday 6th November 2024 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment her Department has made of the impact of imposing VAT on private school fees on the UK’s global reputation. Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) On 30th October, at Budget, the Government confirmed that, as of 1 January 2025, all education, boarding, and vocational training provided for a charge by a private school in the UK will be subject to VAT at the standard rate of 20 per cent.
International schools make an important contribution to the connections between the UK and its international partners, which the Government remains committed to strengthening and deepening further. While they can be subsidised by foreign governments, depending on their funding structure, many international schools still charge fees comparable to that of a lot of British private schools, many of which do not necessarily follow the UK curriculum, nor teach exclusively in English. It would therefore be unfair to carve international schools out of policy changes whilst comparable independent schools remain within scope.
|
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Oral Answers to Questions
176 speeches (9,867 words) Tuesday 29th October 2024 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
Business without Debate
0 speeches (None words) Monday 28th October 2024 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: None Buckley, Ellie Chowns, Barry Gardiner, Anna Gelderd, Sarah Gibson, Chris Hinchliff, Martin Rhodes, Blake - Link to Speech |
Calendar |
---|
Wednesday 13th November 2024 2 p.m. Environmental Audit Committee - Private Meeting View calendar |
Wednesday 20th November 2024 2 p.m. Environmental Audit Committee - Oral evidence Subject: National Planning Policy Framework reforms and the environment At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Alister Scott - Professor of Environmental Geography and Planning at Northumbria University Ant Breach - Associate Director at Centre for Cities Sophie O'Connell - Senior Policy Adviser at Green Alliance At 3:30pm: Oral evidence Richard Wright - Leader at North Kesteven District Council, and Planning spokesman at District Councils' Network Dr Hugh Ellis - Director of Policy at Town and Country Planning Association Sam Stafford - Planning Director at Home Builders Federation View calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
18 Nov 2024
Environmental sustainability and housing growth Environmental Audit Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 20 Dec 2024) The Environmental Audit Committee is seeking views on how the Government’s proposed reforms to national planning policy and housebuilding targets might affect environmental protections and current approaches to sustainable development.Read the terms of reference and find out how to submit written evidence through the Committee's evidence portal here. |
14 Nov 2024
National Planning Policy Framework reforms and the environment Environmental Audit Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions No description available |