To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
General Practitioners: Bedfordshire
Tuesday 3rd February 2026

Asked by: Blake Stephenson (Conservative - Mid Bedfordshire)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the press release entitled Patients in poorer areas to get better access to GPs, published on 9 October 2025, how funding will change in Bedfordshire.

Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

It is vital that funding for core primary medical services is distributed equitably between general practices (GPs) across the country so that resources are targeted where they are most needed. In October 2025 we launched a review of the GP funding formula (The Carr-Hill Formula), with the objective of better matching funding with higher need from poorer health.


Through our 10-Year Health Plan, it will be easier and faster to see a GP. We will end the 8:00am scramble for appointments, train more doctors, and guarantee consultations within 24 hours for those who need one. In October 2024, we invested £160 million into the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme to support the recruitment of 2,900 individual GPs into primary care networks across England, helping to increase appointment availability and improve care for thousands of patients. The new £102 million Primary Care Utilisation and Modernisation Fund will create additional clinical space within over 1,000 GPs across England. This investment will deliver more appointments and improve patient care. There are 13 approved schemes across the NHS Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes ICB being supported by the fund.


Written Question
Local Government Finance
Tuesday 3rd February 2026

Asked by: Blake Stephenson (Conservative - Mid Bedfordshire)

Question

To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what assessment she has made with the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government of the potential impact of the fair funding formula on levels of inequality of access to services.

Answered by Seema Malhotra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)

This government is delivering fairer funding for councils in England. By targeting money where it is needed most, these reforms will improve services for people in deprived places and have positive equalities impacts. Following extensive consultation and engagement, we consulted on allocations at the provisional Local Government Finance Settlement and will set out final allocations at the final Settlement in February.


Written Question
Hospices: Finance
Monday 2nd February 2026

Asked by: Blake Stephenson (Conservative - Mid Bedfordshire)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will make it his policy to ensure that hospices receive the funding required to raise staff pay in line with nationally agreed NHS pay rises.

Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Palliative care services are included in the list of services an integrated care board (ICB) must commission. To support ICBs in this duty, NHS England has published statutory guidance and service specifications.

Hospices, as independent organisations, are free to develop and adapt their own terms and conditions of employment and, therefore, it is for them to determine what is affordable within the financial model they operate, and how to recoup any additional costs they face, including what contractual arrangements are reached with their commissioners.

NHS England uprates national allocations in line with the pay rises for ICBs. It is down to the local contractual arrangements, whether this includes the increases for pay rises or not, as to what the hospice can afford. There is, therefore, no single model which is consistent across England.

The Government is developing a Palliative Care and End-of-Life Care Modern Service Framework (MSF) for England. The MSF will drive improvements in the services that patients and their families receive at the end-of-life and enable ICBs to address challenges in access, quality and sustainability through the delivery of high-quality, personalised care.

We will consider contracting and commissioning arrangements as part of our MSF. We recognise that there is currently a mix of contracting models in the hospice sector. By supporting ICBs to commission more strategically, we can move away from grant and block contract models. In the long term, this will aid sustainability and help hospices’ ability to plan ahead.

I refer the Hon. Member to the Written Ministerial Statement HCWS1087 I gave to the House on 24 November 2025.


Speech in Public Bill Committees - Thu 29 Jan 2026
Finance (No. 2) Bill (Third sitting)

"My hon. Friend talks about fairness in relation to amendment 41 on uprating in line with CPI. Is it also worth considering the importance of certainty, particularly for people on fixed incomes who will benefit from this measure? Uprating by CPI would give them certainty into the future that they …..."
Blake Stephenson - View Speech

View all Blake Stephenson (Con - Mid Bedfordshire) contributions to the debate on: Finance (No. 2) Bill (Third sitting)

Speech in Public Bill Committees - Thu 29 Jan 2026
Finance (No. 2) Bill (Third sitting)

"The Minister says that the measures that the Government are using are appropriate, but can he explain, in response to the question from my hon. Friend the Member for North West Norfolk, why adjusted income was not used and why it is not appropriate?..."
Blake Stephenson - View Speech

View all Blake Stephenson (Con - Mid Bedfordshire) contributions to the debate on: Finance (No. 2) Bill (Third sitting)

Division Vote (Commons)
29 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context
Blake Stephenson (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 9
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Third sitting) - View Vote Context
Blake Stephenson (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Third sitting) - View Vote Context
Blake Stephenson (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Third sitting) - View Vote Context
Blake Stephenson (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 2 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9
Division Vote (Commons)
29 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill (Fourth sitting) - View Vote Context
Blake Stephenson (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 3 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 9