Information between 21st October 2025 - 10th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 313 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 381 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 390 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 317 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 307 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 389 Noes - 102 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 323 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 311 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 328 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 314 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - European Convention on Human Rights (Withdrawal) - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 63 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 96 Noes - 154 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 103 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 152 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 150 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 308 Noes - 153 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 310 Noes - 155 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 80 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 151 |
|
4 Nov 2025 - Supporting High Streets - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 321 |
|
4 Nov 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context Bill Esterson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 403 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Bill Esterson speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Bill Esterson contributed 1 speech (57 words) Tuesday 4th November 2025 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury |
|
Bill Esterson speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Bill Esterson contributed 1 speech (88 words) Wednesday 22nd October 2025 - Commons Chamber Scotland Office |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
22 Oct 2025, 12:18 p.m. - House of Commons "years. Bill Esterson, thank you very much, Mr Speaker. Mental ill health affects 1 in 4 of us. It costs this affects 1 in 4 of us. It costs this country up to £300 billion a year. " Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer MP, The Prime Minister (Holborn and St Pancras, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
22 Oct 2025, 12:18 p.m. - House of Commons "office than they did in 14 long years. Bill Esterson, thank you very " Rt Hon Sir Keir Starmer MP, The Prime Minister (Holborn and St Pancras, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025 9:30 a.m. National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence Subject: Espionage cases and the Official Secrets Acts At 9:45am: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Lord Hermer KC - Attorney General at Attorney General's Office Rt Hon Darren Jones MP - Chancellor at Duchy of Lancaster View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 27th October 2025 4 p.m. National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence Subject: Espionage cases and the Official Secrets Acts At 4:30pm: Oral evidence Stephen Parkinson - Director of Public Prosecutions at Crown Prosecution Service Tom Little KC (First Senior Treasury Counsel) At 5:30pm: Oral evidence Sir Chris Wormald - Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service at Civil Service Matthew Collins - Deputy National Security Adviser at National Security Secretariat View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Unlocking community energy at scale At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Councillor Emily O'Brien - Climate Change Cabinet member at Lewes District Council and UK100 Climate Leadership Academy Graduate Tanuja Pandit - CEO at Power Up North London Eleanor Radcliffe - Project Manager, Energy Commons Team at Carbon Co-op At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Robbie Calvert - Head of Policy and Public Affairs at Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) Dan Stone - Policy and Influencing Officer at Centre for Sustainable Energy Jenny Wigley, KC - Planning Barrister at Landmark Chambers View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 3rd November 2025 4 p.m. National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence Subject: The National Security Strategy At 4:30pm: Oral evidence Isabel Hilton OBE The Rt Hon. the Lord Patten of Barnes KG CH - Former Governor, Hong Kong Nigel Inkster CMG - Former Assistant Chief and Director of Operations and Intelligence at MI6 At 5:15pm: Oral evidence Jonathan Hall KC - Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation and Independent Reviewer of State Threats Legislation Lord Sumption OBE PC, FSA, FRHistS - Former Justice, Supreme Court of the United Kingdom View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 17th November 2025 4 p.m. National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) - Oral evidence Subject: The National Security Strategy At 4:30pm: Oral evidence Professor Sir Anthony Finkelstein CBE - Former Chief Scientific Adviser for National Security Deputy (2015-2021) and President at City St George’s, University of London Professor Sir Nigel Shadbolt - Executive Chair & Co-founder at Open Data Institute, and Principal of Jesus College and Professorial Research Fellow in Computer Science at University of Oxford At 5:15pm: Oral evidence Sophia Gaston - Visiting Fellow in the Department of War Studies, King’s College London, and Founder and Lead at AUKUS Industry Forum Air Commodore (retd) Blythe Crawford CBE - Former Commandant of the Air and Space Warfare Centre and Director GRAIL (Generative Real-Time Artificial Intelligence Lethality) at Tiberius Aerospace Lieutenant Colonel (retd) Haydn Gaukroger OBE - Head of Capability Development at Syos Aerospace View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
30 Oct 2025
Managing the future of UK oil and gas Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 7 Jan 2026) Following an initial evidence session in Parliament on the role of the UK’s refinery industry in the energy transition, the Committee is launching a new inquiry and call for evidence on the future of UK oil and gas. Data from the oil and gas industry shows that it directly supports around 26,000 jobs across the UK and indirectly supports 95,000 more – through offshore drilling, rigging, catering and scaffolding, and onshore fabrication yards, anchor manufacturing, vessel maintenance and more. There are an estimated, further 84,000 jobs for hospitality workers and taxi drivers that serve these industrial communities. The UK has of course experienced previous energy and industrial transitions with the closure of its coal mines in the 1980s, and more recently the closure of major steel manufacturing works. The harsh experience of deindustrialisation has raised concerns that large, skilled workforces may bear the brunt of moving away from fossil fuels. The successful redeployment of the workforce at the UK’s last coal power plant Ratcliffe may prove difficult to replicate for the sector-wide transition away from oil & gas. Yet a key element in delivering the energy transition will be to ensure that the benefits from existing fossil fuel extraction can be utilised in establishing the industry that will replace it. In the initial session in Parliament on October 29, witnesses from the industry highlighted the need to address the oil and gas industry’s fiscal environment. They reinforced the Scottish Affairs Committee’s conclusion that there needs to be a revision to the Energy Profits Levy where “a lack of clarity on the fiscal regime beyond 2030 has created uncertainty for industry in the North Sea. The Energy Profits Levy at its current rate of 38%, which brings the headline rate of tax to 78%, is seen by many in industry as no longer proportionate”. The Committee also heard a further call to ensure that refineries were included in the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, so they could compete on a level playing field with foreign based competitors in what is a global market. The Committee is now launching a full inquiry into the role of oil and gas in the energy transition, the management of the UK’s North Sea energy basin and how the transition away from gas in home heating might be achieved. It will aim to:
|
|
5 Nov 2025
International climate policy Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 7 Jan 2026) Ahead of COP 30, where host country Brazil’s Presidency has set a strategic goal to transition from “negotiation to implementation”, the Committee is launching a call for evidence in a major new inquiry on UK climate policy and finance. Climate change is a global problem that requires a global response. The world is now experiencing the increasingly severe impacts of a rapidly heating climate with intense wildfires, severe droughts, and heavy rainfall leading to destructive floods more frequently and over a wider range. The 2015 Paris Agreement represented a significant moment of international coordination to reduce emissions and to adapt to climate change. But the UN recently announced that global action has failed to limit global heating to the 1.5 degrees agreed there. In 2022, the IPCC warned that “any further delay in concerted global action will miss a brief and rapidly closing window to secure a liveable future”. The UK became the first country in the world to make a legally-binding national commitment to cut greenhouse gas emissions in The Climate Change Act 2008. In 2019 the UK was the first major economy to enshrine its commitment to Net Zero by 2050 in law. At COP 29 in Baku last year, the agreed target for climate finance flowing to developing countries was increased from $100 billion to at least $300 billion a year by 2035, with an aspiration for that to hit $1.3 trillion per year over the same period, in recognition of the scale of the challenge. And in 2022, the latest data available, developed countries delivered around $116 billion – over that target - to developing countries for climate action. But the global political consensus on climate change, the financial sector’s commitment to action on climate and climate diplomacy have all been impacted by tensions and transformations in the global order. The UK Government has stated “there is no global stability without climate stability”, that the UK “must play its part by resetting at home and reconnecting abroad”, and has placed an emphasis on re-establishing the UK “as a climate leader on the global stage”. It committed to meet the previous Government’s pledge of providing £11.6 billion in international climate finance between 2021 and 2026 - but beyond March 2026 the approach is unclear. Through this inquiry, the Committee intends to investigate how the Government can best demonstrate international leadership on climate policy. |
|
17 Jul 2025
Planning for nuclear energy generation Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The UK is embarking on an ambitious programme of investment in nuclear energy, seeking to reverse decades of declining capacity. The Government is counting on new nuclear to help deliver energy security and decarbonise electricity generation. Announcing funding for the Sizewell C nuclear power plant in June, the Energy Secretary said “we need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance.” But past promises of a golden age of nuclear energy have so far failed to materialise. A new reactor has not been connected to the grid for 30 years. Nuclear projects have historically faced unique barriers, including complex regulatory and planning processes. The Government now aims to deliver reforms to streamline planning approvals and give greater certainty to developers. Consultation and scrutiny of EN-7The National Policy Statement for Nuclear Energy Generation (EN-7) has been put forward to help guide planners as they seek to make decisions on siting new nuclear infrastructure. Under the Planning Act 2008, a National Policy Statement (NPS) like EN-7 must undergo public consultation and parliamentary scrutiny before it can be formally designated. EN-7 has undergone two rounds of consultation: the first focused on potential changes to the nuclear siting approach; the second introduced the full draft text. The Committee is now beginning the parliamentary scrutiny process, offering MPs the opportunity to hear from industry, experts, and the public to examine the implications of the framework set out in EN-7 in detail. What is EN-7?EN-7 is intended to become the principal guide for decisions on future nuclear power stations in England and Wales. Nuclear infrastructure proposals are currently limited to eight sites in England and Wales. EN-7 replaces this with a criteria-based approach. It is also intended to support development of a broader range of nuclear technologies like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs), as well as traditional gigawatt-scale plants. The aim is to create a future-proof planning framework that enables a pipeline of new nuclear projects to come forward. Call for EvidenceThe Energy Security and Net Zero Committee is now inviting written submissions to help assess whether EN-7 provides a coherent and effective framework for enabling the UK’s nuclear ambitions. |