Hospitality Sector VAT: Local Economies, Employment and Growth Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury

Hospitality Sector VAT: Local Economies, Employment and Growth

Ben Lake Excerpts
Thursday 12th November 2026

(1 day, 21 hours ago)

Westminster Hall
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Westminster Hall is an alternative Chamber for MPs to hold debates, named after the adjoining Westminster Hall.

Each debate is chaired by an MP from the Panel of Chairs, rather than the Speaker or Deputy Speaker. A Government Minister will give the final speech, and no votes may be called on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Gareth Davies Portrait Gareth Davies
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have to be clear that any support or tax cut has to be fully funded and cannot drive borrowing and debt even higher, particularly now that our debt has reached more than £3 trillion. Some have suggested that a 10% cut to VAT would cost £10.5 billion. As has been mentioned today, that is not an insignificant figure. I have not heard anybody detail how we should pay for such a significant cut, but I am sure the Minister would welcome suggestions.

A VAT reduction is just one way in which we could support the hospitality industry. If hon. Members are serious about cutting taxes and being low-tax champions, let me suggest a few other policies to help hospitality survive and grow, which are fully funded as part of our £71 billion plan of savings.

One of the measures addresses business rates. As has been pointed out, quite rightly, business rates are a significant contributing factor to the cost base of hospitality businesses. We have set out a plan to abolish business rates for 250,000 retail, hospitality and leisure businesses, which would cost £4 billion. Under Labour, business rates have increased. Some pubs and clubs are seeing their business rates increase by as much as 95% over just a couple of years. The Government inherited 75% rates relief for the sector, and then they cut it to 40%. I urge all Members to support the Conservative plan to bring 250,000 hospitality businesses out of paying business rates altogether.

Perhaps more than any other sector, hospitality relies on workers. Working behind a bar or in a kitchen is where so many young people get their first taste of work, as was set out in many examples today. The £25 billion national insurance tax hike has made hiring young people far more costly—often too costly, when combined with Labour’s increase to business rates. Under this Government, the hardest thing to get right now is a job in the hospitality industry. That is not right and does not help young people.

To address that, we Conservatives have outlined how we would cut in half the national insurance paid by an employer hiring someone between the age of 21 and 24. Halving national insurance would mean more young people getting a good start in life, fewer people starting life on benefits and employment costs cut for hospitality. That would cost £2.3 billion, paid for in full by reinstating the two-child benefit cap at a saving of £3.1 billion.

Ben Lake Portrait Ben Lake (Ceredigion Preseli) (PC)
- Hansard - -

On the point about the cumulative impact and pressures on businesses, and underlining the urgency of the situation, I spoke to some hospitality business owners in my constituency last week who told me that I could offer them a newly refurbished town centre restaurant and they would throw the keys back at me, because it is not worth it any more.

Gareth Davies Portrait Gareth Davies
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am extremely sorry to hear that. The hon. Member represents a beautiful part of the country. People should visit it and give all the custom they can to the businesses that he represents. The reality is that the compound effect of multiple costs and tax rises is having a real-life impact. I hope the Minister is listening.

I have not yet mentioned the holiday tax, another measure forcing hospitality businesses to raise their prices for working families who just want to take a break away and have a holiday. Many Members have compared this particular tax with those of our European competitors. UKHospitality has been clear that the holiday tax will mean that holidays in England are charged double the tax of visiting Paris and 70% the tax of visiting Barcelona or Rome. Only this Government could look at a wet weekend at the British seaside and decide that the problem was that it was too cheap.

We have to take action. There has been so much anti-growth taxation and regulation, I could go on and on, but I will save Government Members their blushes. This Government now tax the pint, the pub, the person pulling the pint, and the bed upstairs—alcohol duty, energy costs, labour cost hikes, the Employment Rights Act or, as some have called it, the unemployment rights Act—all piling on pressure at the same time. This Government keep ordering rounds and leaving the landlord with the tab.

Prosperity begins small. It begins with the pub on the corner, the small B&B and the family-run café. Those are the employers and businesses that we should seek to support. I hope that the Minister will listen to the many concerns expressed across the Chamber. The Opposition share them, and that is why we have set out a number of costed ways in which to ease the pressure on the hospitality industry for all our constituents.