Information between 28th October 2024 - 7th November 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 359 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 373 Noes - 110 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 356 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 77 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 371 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 401 Noes - 120 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 360 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 378 Noes - 116 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 356 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 383 Noes - 184 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 368 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 455 Noes - 125 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 368 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 400 Noes - 120 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 362 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 450 Noes - 120 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 364 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 454 Noes - 124 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 367 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 400 Noes - 122 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 111 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 345 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 361 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 124 Noes - 361 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Ben Goldsborough voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 346 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 96 Noes - 353 |
Speeches |
---|
Ben Goldsborough speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Ben Goldsborough contributed 1 speech (55 words) Tuesday 5th November 2024 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Justice |
Ben Goldsborough speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Ben Goldsborough contributed 1 speech (66 words) Wednesday 30th October 2024 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
Written Answers |
---|
Prisoners on Remand
Asked by: Ben Goldsborough (Labour - South Norfolk) Tuesday 5th November 2024 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps she is taking to address the increase in the remand population across the prison estate. Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury We are committed to working with partners across the criminal justice system to effectively manage the growth in the prison remand population, which currently sits at a record high. On 17 October 2024, we announced plans to allow magistrates’ courts to hand down custodial sentences of up to 12 months for a single triable either way offence – doubling their current powers. The change will help us bear down on the remand population by ensuring those on remand are tried and sentenced quicker. This change will help us to better manage the pressure on reception jails and maximise the space across the prison estate, created by SDS40. The Statutory Instrument to increase magistrates’ courts sentencing powers was laid on 28 October 2024 and these changes will come into force on 18 November 2024. |
Prosecutions
Asked by: Ben Goldsborough (Labour - South Norfolk) Wednesday 6th November 2024 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that people engaging in the Single Justice Procedure are aware of the HM Courts and Tribunal Service guidance which states that courts should not issue targets for the number of Single Justice cases that must be completed. Answered by Heidi Alexander - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) Courts have been reminded that no targets have been set for the number of cases to be completed in a session. Listing is a judicial responsibility and function. Local Judicial Business Groups decide how much work is assigned to court hearings, including Single Justice Procedure (SJP) sessions. If a magistrate does not complete the cases allocated to a SJP session, the cases can be picked up in a subsequent session. The Government has listened to the concerns raised on SJP and as a first step has asked HM Courts and Tribunals to redesign the SJP Notice. We will also be calling in SJP prosecutors to discuss ways in which we could ensure public interest is considered by them in advance of making prosecutions. The SJP is vital for the efficient running of the magistrates court. However, it must operate fairly and effectively. We will not tolerate poor practice, and we will not hesitate to fundamentally reform the system if that is required.
|
Prosecutions
Asked by: Ben Goldsborough (Labour - South Norfolk) Wednesday 6th November 2024 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether her Department has had discussions with the Magistrates Association on reports of the use of targets for the number of Single Justice Procedures completed. Answered by Heidi Alexander - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) Magistrates are free to take as long as they need when making decisions on any criminal case, including those dealt with under the Single Justice Procedure (SJP). There is no set target for the number of cases decided in an SJP session and courts have been reminded of this. We have not discussed this matter with the Magistrates’ Association. |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Great British Energy Bill
131 speeches (28,443 words) Report stage Tuesday 29th October 2024 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero Mentions: 1: Claire Coutinho (Con - East Surrey) Member for South Norfolk (Ben Goldsborough) said on Facebook:“everyone in the east of England will get - Link to Speech |
Business without Debate
0 speeches (None words) Monday 28th October 2024 - Commons Chamber |