Israel: United States Diplomatic Representation Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Israel: United States Diplomatic Representation

Baroness Uddin Excerpts
Thursday 7th December 2017

(6 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Uddin Portrait Baroness Uddin (Non-Afl)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I, too, ask the noble Baroness to clarify whether the Government consider east Jerusalem to be occupied territory. I welcome the Answer that she repeated as a Statement. I hope the implication is that there is no impact from the Trump decision, and I hope Britain will stand steadfast against any complicity in destabilising the region. I am almost hanging on to the thread when I say that Britain itself has not played an adequate role in creating a peaceful Middle East. In the light of the Prime Minister’s brazen support for the Prime Minister of Israel in celebrating Balfour’s naked declaration, does she believe the prospect of peace in the Middle East and a free Palestine has been lost for ever?

Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think I can really deal with only the last part of the noble Baroness’ question. The answer to it is no. We think the peace process is relevant and important and that there is international will and resolve to make it become a reality. We may disagree with the United States’ approach in this matter, and we made that disagreement clear, but that does not in any way detract from our willingness and our desire as a Government to do everything we can to support the continuance of the peace process, and to do that in a positive and optimistic manner.