Cost of Living: Food Waste Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Baroness Hayman of Ullock

Main Page: Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour - Life peer)

Cost of Living: Food Waste

Baroness Hayman of Ullock Excerpts
Thursday 21st September 2023

(1 year, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate
Lord Harlech Portrait Lord Harlech (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the noble Baroness is absolutely right, in that redistribution is a vital part of reducing food waste. Since 2015, overall levels of redistribution have increased threefold—worth in excess of £1.3 billion and more than 1 billion meals. I will take this back to the department to discuss what we can do with the catering service.

Baroness Hayman of Ullock Portrait Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, the Minister talked about the cost to business, but the Government’s impact assessment found that a very small reduction in food waste—just 0.25%—is enough to balance the cost of the mandatory reporting scheme and that a 1% reduction would save food businesses at least £24 million every year: significant cost savings that could help offset the substantial prices that consumers have faced over the past year and a half. Why do the Government continue to insist that this scheme, which is almost universally wanted, would introduce extra costs when those who would be subject to it say it would be good for business?

Lord Harlech Portrait Lord Harlech (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I think the noble Baroness stated the answer in her question. It makes good business sense for businesses to reduce their food waste and their costs, as that it is better for their bottom line, but we are not going to do something at the time of a cost of living crisis which could incur additional cost for consumers.