Information between 10th April 2026 - 20th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 27th April 2026 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour - Life peer) Orders and regulations - Grand Committee Subject: Control of Trade in Endangered Species (Amendment and Revocation) Regulations 2026 Control of Trade in Endangered Species (Amendment and Revocation) Regulations 2026 View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 114 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 30 Noes - 130 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 114 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 46 Noes - 117 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 156 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 231 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 155 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 332 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 180 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 187 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 154 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 173 |
|
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 141 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 55 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 169 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 200 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 165 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 260 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 154 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 192 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 144 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 144 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 141 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 117 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 121 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 142 |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
15 Apr 2026, 3:51 p.m. - House of Lords "2026. Baroness Hayman of Ullock. >> My Lords, I beg leave to move the motion standing in my name on the Order Paper. " Business of the House - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 15th April 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Baroness Hayman for Defra on waste crime 23.03.2026 Environment and Climate Change Committee Found: Baroness Hayman of Ullock Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Seacole Building 2 Marsham Street |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Water Companies: Prosecutions
Asked by: Baroness Coffey (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 14th April 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 27 March (HL15802), whether they plan to close the national investigation into water and sewerage service companies launched in November 2021 after the consideration of the three pending charges for the second defendant water company. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The three pending charges all relate to Environment Act 1995 Section 110 charges for failing to provide records required within the national investigation into water and sewerage service companies launched in November 2021. They are not the main focus of the investigation which deals with discharges to the environment when not meeting flow to full treatment and insufficient rainfall.
There are no plans to close the investigation after the three charges pending against the second defendant have been settled. |
|
Agricultural Products: UK Trade with EU
Asked by: Lord Kamall (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 13th April 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 16 January (HL13474), whether they are considering impacts of the agreement beyond the agrifood sector, including on the vitamins, minerals and supplements industry. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) As part of the UK-EU SPS Agreement currently being negotiated, the Government is making a sovereign choice in the national interest to align in some areas where it makes sense to do so, as set out in the Government’s recently published announcement on legislation in scope. This includes Regulation 1925/2006 on the addition of vitamins and minerals and certain other substances to foods and Directive 2002/46/EC relating to Food supplements. While those negotiations are ongoing, we cannot comment further on the SPS agreement.
The Government is committed to working with industry, particularly those impacted on the above, on preparing for implementation, noting that the precise detail and timing of this process – including legislative arrangements are subject to discussions with the EU. |