Information between 17th November 2025 - 27th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 81 Noes - 132 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 223 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 220 |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
17 Nov 2025, 3:22 p.m. - House of Lords "Protection (Wet Wipes Containing Plastic) (England) Regulations 2025 Baroness Hayman of Ullock. Baroness Hayman of Ullock. " Baroness Smith of Malvern, Minister of State (Education) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Nov 2025, 6:45 p.m. - House of Lords "that the noble Lady Baroness Hayman of Ullock, whom we all respect, in answer to an oral question in this " Lord Blencathra (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Agriculture: Import Controls
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Wednesday 17th December 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 15 September (HL10370), what assessment they made following engagement with logistics businesses of the current system that is used to notify drivers of physical checks of their vehicle under the Border Target Operating Model without specifying which consignment is affected. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Defra continues to have regular engagement with border stakeholders including the logistics sector, to discuss operational aspects of the Border Target Operating Model implementation. Defra continues to use this engagement with stakeholders for review and improvement purposes |
|
Animal Welfare
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Wednesday 17th December 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 4 December (HL Deb col 1907), whether they will publish the animal welfare legislation and consultation recommendations that have not yet been commenced or acted on. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) As set out by the Prime Minister, we will publish our Animal Welfare Strategy this year which will set out our priorities for animal welfare. |
|
Waste: Crime
Asked by: Earl Russell (Liberal Democrat - Excepted Hereditary) Monday 8th December 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government whether the large-scale illegal waste dumping sites in (1) Sittingbourne in Kent, and (2) Camborne in Cornwall, which were listed as "active" in the letter from Baroness Hayman of Ullock to Lord Krebs on 5 November, are currently still receiving waste; and if so, why and what steps they are taking to close those sites. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Waste input ceased at the site in Sittingbourne in 2021. The site at Camborne experienced a period of cessation from June 2025 until the end of November 2025. At the end of November one further deposit of waste was discovered.
The original letter to Lord Krebs on 5 November gave descriptions of ‘active’ and ‘inactive’ sites. The description of an ‘active’ site said it continued to accept waste – this was incorrect. Defra apologises for this mistake and has issued a correction to Lord Krebs accordingly.
A site is considered ‘active’ in this context if the Environment Agency is taking action at the site. A site having ‘active’ status does not necessarily mean that the site is actively receiving waste |
|
Pets: Insecticides
Asked by: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party - Life peer) Thursday 27th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 8 July (HL9038), what actions they have taken to reduce the environmental impact of pet parasiticides, particularly fipronil and imidacloprid. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) We recognise increasing concerns about the environmental impact of spot-on parasiticide treatments for companion animals. Research funded by the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has improved understanding of how substances such as fipronil and imidacloprid enter the environment, but further evidence is needed to address gaps around contamination sources, behavioural influences, and effective monitoring. To strengthen this evidence base, the VMD has launched a national survey to gather data on pet owner behaviours. In parallel, exposure modelling is being explored to support potential future regulatory decisions. These initiatives aim to safeguard animal health while reducing environmental impacts.
On 14 August 2025, the cross-Government Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Group convened its first stakeholder workshop on the ‘Appropriate and Practical Use of Topical Pet Parasiticides’, engaging a wide range of stakeholders from the companion animal sector. The workshop focused on developing educational messaging for pet owners on the correct use and disposal of parasiticides, which is now being refined and is expected to launch in spring. Additional measures to promote responsible parasiticide use were also explored and will be taken forward by other stakeholder groups, with the VMD helping to facilitate collaboration where appropriate. |
|
Flood Control: Finance
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Monday 24th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 30 October (HL11477), whether they will keep the flooding spending formula under regular review as the evidence base for the effectiveness of natural flood management techniques grows. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Delivering on the Government’s Plan for Change, we are investing record levels in flood protection. Over the next Spending Review period (2026/27 to 2028/29), £4.2 billion will be allocated to build new flood schemes and maintain and repair existing defences across the country. This equates to an average of £1.4 billion per year, a 5% increase on the current average of £1.33 billion for 2024/25 and 2025/26. Further details will be published in due course, including the split between capital and revenue funding.
Natural flood management (NFM) plays a vital role in reducing flood risk while delivering wider benefits for people, communities, and the environment. That is why we will be investing at least £300m in NFM over ten years – the highest figure to date for the floods programme. We have also removed barriers that previously held back these projects. Working closely with the Environment Agency, we will explore opportunities to enable more landscape-scale NFM through partnership working and strengthen the evidence base for these interventions.
To ensure the new funding policy delivers effective outcomes, including NFM, we will review its impact after three years. |
|
Flood Control: Finance
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Monday 24th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 30 October (HL11477), how much of the £4.2 billion spending review commitment for flood defences will be made up of capital spending. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Delivering on the Government’s Plan for Change, we are investing record levels in flood protection. Over the next Spending Review period (2026/27 to 2028/29), £4.2 billion will be allocated to build new flood schemes and maintain and repair existing defences across the country. This equates to an average of £1.4 billion per year, a 5% increase on the current average of £1.33 billion for 2024/25 and 2025/26. Further details will be published in due course, including the split between capital and revenue funding.
Natural flood management (NFM) plays a vital role in reducing flood risk while delivering wider benefits for people, communities, and the environment. That is why we will be investing at least £300m in NFM over ten years – the highest figure to date for the floods programme. We have also removed barriers that previously held back these projects. Working closely with the Environment Agency, we will explore opportunities to enable more landscape-scale NFM through partnership working and strengthen the evidence base for these interventions.
To ensure the new funding policy delivers effective outcomes, including NFM, we will review its impact after three years. |
| Parliamentary Research |
|---|
|
Debate on water scarcity - CDP-2025-0236
Dec. 05 2025 Found: Answering member: Baroness Hayman of Ullock | Party: Labour | Department: Department for Environment |
| Department Publications - Policy and Engagement |
|---|
|
Monday 22nd December 2025
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Source Page: Animal welfare strategy for England Document: (PDF) Found: The Rt Hon Emma Reynolds MP Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Baroness Hayman of Ullock |
| Department Publications - Transparency | |
|---|---|
|
Tuesday 16th December 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: November 2025 Document: (webpage) Found: -11-16 89UP Dinner No 20 Mary Creagh 2025-11-19 Food and Land Use Coalition Dinner No 40 Baroness Hayman of Ullock |
|
|
Tuesday 16th December 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: November 2025 Document: (webpage) Found: Nil Return Mary Creagh Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Baroness Hayman of Ullock |
|
|
Tuesday 16th December 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: November 2025 Document: View online (webpage) Found: class="govuk-table__row js-govuk-table__row"> | |
|
Tuesday 16th December 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: November 2025 Document: View online (webpage) Found: class="govuk-table__row js-govuk-table__row"> | |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: October 2025 Document: (webpage) Found: Nil Return Nil Return Mary Creagh Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Baroness Hayman of Ullock |
|
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: October 2025 Document: View online (webpage) Found: class="govuk-table__row js-govuk-table__row"> | |
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: October 2025 Document: (webpage) Found: Nil Return Mary Creagh Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Nil Return Baroness Hayman of Ullock |
|
|
Tuesday 2nd December 2025
Cabinet Office Source Page: Register of Ministers’ Gifts and Hospitality: October 2025 Document: View online (webpage) Found: class="govuk-table__row js-govuk-table__row"> |
| Deposited Papers |
|---|
|
Monday 8th December 2025
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Source Page: Letter dated 03/12/2025 from Baroness Hayman of Ullock to Lord Krebs regarding a question concerning six large-scale sites where illegal waste dumping occurred, as raised during a parliamentary question on the steps being taken by the government to tackle waste crime. 3p. Document: B_Hayman_to_L_Krebs_-_follow_up_correction.pdf (PDF) Found: Letter dated 03/12/2025 from Baroness Hayman of Ullock to Lord Krebs regarding a question concerning |