Information between 8th November 2025 - 28th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 169 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 195 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 175 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 81 Noes - 132 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244 |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
17 Nov 2025, 3:22 p.m. - House of Lords "Protection (Wet Wipes Containing Plastic) (England) Regulations 2025 Baroness Hayman of Ullock. Baroness Hayman of Ullock. " Baroness Smith of Malvern, Minister of State (Education) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
17 Nov 2025, 6:45 p.m. - House of Lords "that the noble Lady Baroness Hayman of Ullock, whom we all respect, in answer to an oral question in this " Lord Blencathra (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 26th November 2025
Correspondence - Letter from Lord Carlile of Berriew to Rt Hon Nick Thomas-Symonds MP re: Veterinary medicine supply in Northern Ireland, 26 November 2025 Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee Found: copying this letter to Rt Hon Hilary Benn MP, Secretary of State for Northern Ireland; Baroness Hayman of Ullock |
|
Tuesday 18th November 2025
Written Evidence - British Horse Council APH0220 - Animal and plant health Animal and plant health - Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Found: UK is currently working on a domestic co-design solution to these proposals supported by Baroness Hayman of Ullock |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Pets: Insecticides
Asked by: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party - Life peer) Thursday 27th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 8 July (HL9038), what actions they have taken to reduce the environmental impact of pet parasiticides, particularly fipronil and imidacloprid. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) We recognise increasing concerns about the environmental impact of spot-on parasiticide treatments for companion animals. Research funded by the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has improved understanding of how substances such as fipronil and imidacloprid enter the environment, but further evidence is needed to address gaps around contamination sources, behavioural influences, and effective monitoring. To strengthen this evidence base, the VMD has launched a national survey to gather data on pet owner behaviours. In parallel, exposure modelling is being explored to support potential future regulatory decisions. These initiatives aim to safeguard animal health while reducing environmental impacts.
On 14 August 2025, the cross-Government Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Group convened its first stakeholder workshop on the ‘Appropriate and Practical Use of Topical Pet Parasiticides’, engaging a wide range of stakeholders from the companion animal sector. The workshop focused on developing educational messaging for pet owners on the correct use and disposal of parasiticides, which is now being refined and is expected to launch in spring. Additional measures to promote responsible parasiticide use were also explored and will be taken forward by other stakeholder groups, with the VMD helping to facilitate collaboration where appropriate. |
|
Flood Control: Finance
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Monday 24th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 30 October (HL11477), whether they will keep the flooding spending formula under regular review as the evidence base for the effectiveness of natural flood management techniques grows. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Delivering on the Government’s Plan for Change, we are investing record levels in flood protection. Over the next Spending Review period (2026/27 to 2028/29), £4.2 billion will be allocated to build new flood schemes and maintain and repair existing defences across the country. This equates to an average of £1.4 billion per year, a 5% increase on the current average of £1.33 billion for 2024/25 and 2025/26. Further details will be published in due course, including the split between capital and revenue funding.
Natural flood management (NFM) plays a vital role in reducing flood risk while delivering wider benefits for people, communities, and the environment. That is why we will be investing at least £300m in NFM over ten years – the highest figure to date for the floods programme. We have also removed barriers that previously held back these projects. Working closely with the Environment Agency, we will explore opportunities to enable more landscape-scale NFM through partnership working and strengthen the evidence base for these interventions.
To ensure the new funding policy delivers effective outcomes, including NFM, we will review its impact after three years. |
|
Flood Control: Finance
Asked by: Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour - Life peer) Monday 24th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 30 October (HL11477), how much of the £4.2 billion spending review commitment for flood defences will be made up of capital spending. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Delivering on the Government’s Plan for Change, we are investing record levels in flood protection. Over the next Spending Review period (2026/27 to 2028/29), £4.2 billion will be allocated to build new flood schemes and maintain and repair existing defences across the country. This equates to an average of £1.4 billion per year, a 5% increase on the current average of £1.33 billion for 2024/25 and 2025/26. Further details will be published in due course, including the split between capital and revenue funding.
Natural flood management (NFM) plays a vital role in reducing flood risk while delivering wider benefits for people, communities, and the environment. That is why we will be investing at least £300m in NFM over ten years – the highest figure to date for the floods programme. We have also removed barriers that previously held back these projects. Working closely with the Environment Agency, we will explore opportunities to enable more landscape-scale NFM through partnership working and strengthen the evidence base for these interventions.
To ensure the new funding policy delivers effective outcomes, including NFM, we will review its impact after three years. |
|
Fly-tipping: Private Property
Asked by: Lord Cromwell (Crossbench - Excepted Hereditary) Wednesday 12th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 29 October (HL11074), whether they will make an assessment of the responsibilities of local authorities in relation to clearing up fly-tipping that takes place on a private land more than 10 metres from the highway. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) There is no plan to make an assessment of the responsibilities of local authorities in relation to clearing up fly-tipping that takes place on a private land more than 10 metres from the highway.
Landowners are responsible for clearing waste from land that they own. |
| Department Publications - Transparency |
|---|
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Source Page: Defra's annual report and accounts 2024 to 2025 Document: (PDF) Found: 2024) 2 1 Emma Hardy MP Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (from 9 July 2024) 2 1 Baroness Hayman of Ullock |
| Department Publications - Policy and Engagement |
|---|
|
Tuesday 11th November 2025
Department for Science, Innovation & Technology Source Page: Replacing animals in science strategy Document: (PDF) Found: animals in science 4 Rt Hon Lord Hanson of Flint Minister of State Home Office Baroness Hayman of Ullock |