Baroness Hayman of Ullock Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Hayman of Ullock

Information between 8th February 2026 - 18th February 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 169 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 258
10 Feb 2026 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayman of Ullock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 173 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 251


Speeches
Baroness Hayman of Ullock speeches from: Animal Welfare Strategy: Rural Communities
Baroness Hayman of Ullock contributed 10 speeches (768 words)
Thursday 12th February 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Baroness Hayman of Ullock speeches from: Changing Weather Patterns and Floods
Baroness Hayman of Ullock contributed 9 speeches (877 words)
Thursday 12th February 2026 - Lords Chamber
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs



Baroness Hayman of Ullock mentioned

Select Committee Documents
Thursday 12th February 2026
Correspondence - Letter from Andrew Muir MLA, Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA), 27 January 2026

Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee

Found: Ireland Scrutiny Committee’s recent consideration of this and relevant correspondence with Baroness Hayman of Ullock



Written Answers
Question Link
Asked by: Lord Birt (Crossbench - Life peer)
Thursday 12th February 2026

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 20 January 2026 (HL13504), why a farmer or landowner is required to bear the cost of the unlawful dumping of waste by an unidentified third party on their land.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

We recognise the financial burden that clearing fly-tipped waste places on landowners. However, central Government generally does not compensate victims of non-violent crime. It is important not to create a perverse incentive for some people to dump, or facilitate the dumping of, waste.

However, where there is sufficient evidence, fly-tippers can be prosecuted and, on conviction, a cost order can be made by the court so that a landowner’s costs can be recovered from the perpetrator.

We are working with a wide range of interested parties through the National Fly-Tipping Prevention Group, such as the National Farmers Union (NFU), to promote and disseminate good practice, including how to prevent fly-tipping on private land.