Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

Debate between Anneliese Dodds and Marie Tidball

Friday 16th May 2025 Commons Chamber

[Anneliese Dodds]

I will not give way at the moment.

That is why it is important that that exclusion is put very clearly on the face of the Bill.

[Dr Marie Tidball (Penistone and Stocksbridge) (Lab)]

Does my right hon. Friend agree that clause 2(3) makes it very clear that no one can qualify for assistance under the Bill by reason only of either disability or mental disorder unless they also have six months’ terminality and capacity?

[Anneliese Dodds]

I am aware of what my hon. Friend quite rightly refers to. Of course, any such condition would have to be coterminous with a terminal illness, but we know—the Committee thrashed this out for a long period—that depression is often present at the same time as a diagnosis of terminal illness. We also know that concepts such as “terminal anorexia” have started to be used in certain contexts. That unfortunately suggests that, despite the many protestations of those who understandably support the Bill, there is the possibility that those subject to eating disorders will be pulled within its scope. I am very pleased that amendment 14 would rule that out—it is important that it does so. It is critical that this Chamber sends that message too, given the potential confusion about scope.

I am very grateful for the opportunity to speak to new clause 16 and amendment 14. Above all, I hope we can continue this important discussion, which is critical for so many of our constituents.