Points of Order Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Points of Order

Anneliese Dodds Excerpts
Wednesday 1st December 2021

(2 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate
Anneliese Dodds Portrait Anneliese Dodds (Oxford East) (Lab/Co-op)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. Yesterday the right hon. Member for West Suffolk (Matt Hancock) intervened on me to “set the record straight” on whether one of his constituents secured a contract from the Government related to the covid-19 pandemic. He said that claims of such a contract were

“a fabrication pushed by the Labour party—it is a load of rubbish.”—[Official Report, 30 November 2021; Vol. 704, c. 851.]

Yet today the Good Law Project published evidence indicating that a company called Alpha Laboratories won a contract worth more than £40 million from the Department of Health and Social Care in December 2020, and that this company appears to have subcontracted all the manufacturing of goods to another company, Hinpack Ltd, which appears to be run by his constituent.

Madam Deputy Speaker, I seek your guidance on whether the right hon. Gentleman should return to the House to set the record straight by withdrawing the comments he made yesterday.

Eleanor Laing Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Eleanor Laing)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the hon. Lady for giving me notice of her point of order, and she will recall that I was in the Chair during her exchange with the right hon. Member for West Suffolk (Matt Hancock). I must ascertain that she has mentioned to him that she intended to raise this matter today.

Anneliese Dodds Portrait Anneliese Dodds
- Hansard - -

indicated assent.

Eleanor Laing Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Thank you for that confirmation. The hon. Lady knows that what is said by one Member to another is not a matter for the Chair. If the facts that have been presented to the Chamber turn out to be wrong, it is incumbent on not only every Minister but every Member to come back to the Chamber at the earliest opportunity to set the record straight. I make no judgment about the facts, because that is not a matter for me. The facts are a matter for debate.

I understand why the hon. Lady wanted to raise the matter. She has done so, and she will know there are various ways in which she can hold Ministers to account for the veracity or otherwise of the facts she is disputing.